Using a vast swath of data spanning the past six decades, "Unequal Democracy" debunks many myths about politics in contemporary America, using the widening gap between the rich and the poor to shed disturbing light on the workings of American democracy. Larry Bartels shows the gap between the rich and poor has increased greatly under Republican administrations and decreased slightly under Democrats, leaving America grossly unequal. This is not simply the result of economic forces, but the product of broad-reaching policy choices in a political system dominated by partisan ideologies and the interests of the wealthy. Bartels demonstrates that elected officials respond to the views of affluent constituents but ignore the views of poor people. He shows that Republican presidents in particular have consistently produced much less income growth for middle-class and working-poor families than for affluent families, greatly increasing inequality. He provides revealing case studies of key policy shifts contributing to inequality, including the massive Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 and the erosion of the minimum wage. Finally, he challenges conventional explanations for why many voters seem to vote against their own economic interests, contending that working-class voters have not been lured into the Republican camp by 'values issues' like abortion and gay marriage, as commonly believed, but that Republican presidents have been remarkably successful in timing income growth to cater to short-sighted voters. "Unequal Democracy" is social science at its very best. It provides a deep and searching analysis of the political causes and consequences of America's growing income gap, and a sobering assessment of the capacity of the American political system to live up to its democratic ideals.
“新镀金时代”(New Gilded Age)一词,最早可能出现在2000年出版的,关于“富裕文化”的同名《纽约客》文集。而后,这个词汇为众多论者借用,保罗·克鲁格曼是其中格外突出的一位。他早在2002年就用“新镀金时代”来形容当代美国的不平等状况,直到近期评论皮克提(Thomas Pi...
評分这是一本对美式民主提出质疑的著作,像大多数左派批评者一样,巴特尔斯也是以“平等”为武器,但他走得更远,他认为:美式民主进一步加剧了不平等的现实,使之成为社会痼疾,要改变这一点,必须走出党派政治思维,否则难有解药。 本书的丰富数据令人印象深刻,在金融危机的大...
評分“新镀金时代”(New Gilded Age)一词,最早可能出现在2000年出版的,关于“富裕文化”的同名《纽约客》文集。而后,这个词汇为众多论者借用,保罗·克鲁格曼是其中格外突出的一位。他早在2002年就用“新镀金时代”来形容当代美国的不平等状况,直到近期评论皮克提(Thomas Pi...
評分“新镀金时代”(New Gilded Age)一词,最早可能出现在2000年出版的,关于“富裕文化”的同名《纽约客》文集。而后,这个词汇为众多论者借用,保罗·克鲁格曼是其中格外突出的一位。他早在2002年就用“新镀金时代”来形容当代美国的不平等状况,直到近期评论皮克提(Thomas Pi...
評分这是一本对美式民主提出质疑的著作,像大多数左派批评者一样,巴特尔斯也是以“平等”为武器,但他走得更远,他认为:美式民主进一步加剧了不平等的现实,使之成为社会痼疾,要改变这一点,必须走出党派政治思维,否则难有解药。 本书的丰富数据令人印象深刻,在金融危机的大...
Stretch yourself —— I study it because I know little of it. I am not good at it at all. But I will learn something.
评分Stretch yourself —— I study it because I know little of it. I am not good at it at all. But I will learn something.
评分哎呀,說來說去窮人們的訴求還是得不到保證嘛
评分Stretch yourself —— I study it because I know little of it. I am not good at it at all. But I will learn something.
评分哎呀,說來說去窮人們的訴求還是得不到保證嘛
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有