图书标签: 财经  经营管理  理财  投资  国际关系  商业经营  人文  for   

喜欢 The Next 100 Years 的读者还喜欢

The book started off strong, but then the ideas just become ridiculously stupid. The author should have stayed within his area of competency, ie, geopolitics, rather than trying to predict in every single regard- that just makes him look like a fool.

美国有很多问题，美国有很多假想敌，中国俄罗斯日本还能理解，还有波兰土尔其墨西哥？作者的解释是common sense always betrays us?但是和美国比它们都弱爆了。这是怎样的阅读过程呐。(¬_¬)

The book started off strong, but then the ideas just become ridiculously stupid. The author should have stayed within his area of competency, ie, geopolitics, rather than trying to predict in every single regard- that just makes him look like a fool.

The book started off strong, but then the ideas just become ridiculously stupid. The author should have stayed within his area of competency, ie, geopolitics, rather than trying to predict in every single regard- that just makes him look like a fool.

The book started off strong, but then the ideas just become ridiculously stupid. The author should have stayed within his area of competency, ie, geopolitics, rather than trying to predict in every single regard- that just makes him look like a fool.

2010-02-03 14:41 现代社会里没几个人是耐得住的寂寞的吧？内心的得瑟也是酒香独怕巷子深的吧？所以大家都是怎么夸张之极致怎么来吧？阅读《未来100年 大预言》的感觉就是一个词儿：嚣张！不...  

百年之后见真伪 评《未来100年大预言》 未来100年，世界的发展会是什么样？世界格局又会发生什么样的变动？这本《未来100年大预言》的预言是：未来的100年依旧是美国的100年，美国继续作为超级大国统治世界，现有可能对美国霸权产生威胁的俄罗斯、中国和伊斯兰国家在2020年...  

假设我对我预测未来的能力跟作者对他自身能力一样有自信，那我会说他说的东西百分之五都难成真。 我读过他书以后，首先觉得他的历史知识还远远不够他来通过经验对未来进行数据拟合似地预测。可是，作者又过于倾向以历史曾经有过的发展模式来预测未来。 在作者眼...

虽然在国内一片差评，但是我认为地缘政治确实是一种新的思考方法，里面还介绍了很多上个世纪大事件的细节，感觉比较新颖，所谓预测本来就是一种很大胆前卫的做法，预测一百年就更需要勇气。勇气可嘉。要验证这本书是好是坏，现在下定论还为时过早，等一百年后再说作者的理论有...