While our culture generally trusts experts and distrusts the wisdom of the masses, New Yorker business columnist Surowiecki argues that "under the right circumstances, groups are remarkably intelligent, and are often smarter than the smartest people in them." To support this almost counterintuitive proposition, Surowiecki explores problems involving cognition (we're all trying to identify a correct answer), coordination (we need to synchronize our individual activities with others) and cooperation (we have to act together despite our self-interest). His rubric, then, covers a range of problems, including driving in traffic, competing on TV game shows, maximizing stock market performance, voting for political candidates, navigating busy sidewalks, tracking SARS and designing Internet search engines like Google. If four basic conditions are met, a crowd's "collective intelligence" will produce better outcomes than a small group of experts, Surowiecki says, even if members of the crowd don't know all the facts or choose, individually, to act irrationally. "Wise crowds" need (1) diversity of opinion; (2) independence of members from one another; (3) decentralization; and (4) a good method for aggregating opinions. The diversity brings in different information; independence keeps people from being swayed by a single opinion leader; people's errors balance each other out; and including all opinions guarantees that the results are "smarter" than if a single expert had been in charge. Surowiecki's style is pleasantly informal, a tactical disguise for what might otherwise be rather dense material. He offers a great introduction to applied behavioral economics and game theory.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
詹姆斯•索罗维基(James Surowiecki)
《纽约客》杂志特约撰稿人。他的文章见诸很多出版物,包括《纽约时报》《华尔街日报》《艺术论坛报》《连线》杂志和《候选人名单》杂志。索罗维基最初在《纽约客》杂志的“金融专版”阐述了群体智慧的思想,回答了美国社会长期以来对群体智慧和团队决策能力的质疑。
以下个人观感,主要是对个人独立性的关注,以及脑洞。 倘若按照一定的规则将群体组织起来,获得有效的结果,并以某种方式分析,那么,在存在确定答案的情况下,群体所得出的结论将是可能状况的最优解。 以上是我对此书的总结,书中对每个关键词都佐以了理论阐释和实验及观测...
评分春秋时,齐国曾几乎被燕国灭掉,在逃难中,田单把车轴外面的木头锯掉,得以脱身,而其他人则因这段木头太长,相互搅在一起,只好集体束手就擒。 改装一下车辆,这不需要很高明的思考,可为什么只有田单做到了呢?难道他比别人都聪明? 在生活中,我们经常可以看到这样的现象...
评分这本书的标准译名应该是《群体智慧(The Wisdom of Crowds)》,而不是出版商为了吸引眼球而设计的什么《百万大决定》。作者通过不胜枚举的诸多心理学、社会学实验,试图证明群体智慧在人类世界中的许多关键作用,以及所蕴含的巨大潜力。 蚂蚁是低等生物,但蚁群却每每展现出...
评分开始觉得是对勒庞思想的颠覆,但是读后觉得是相辅相成。因为两者对群体的定义不同,勒庞对群体的定义是无意识结构做主导时则形成群体,此时的群体做的决定是愚蠢,极端的。但索罗维基强调做出聪明决策的群体最主要一条就是要独立判断,要保持有意识结构,不被他人所影...
评分作者举了很多例子证明了,在适当的条件下,群体的智慧是出色的(猜糖豆、电子市场),也举了很多反例,论述了在一些环境中,群体又是非常愚蠢,甚至疯狂的(泡沫、暴民)。在讨论群体的智慧时,本书把问题对象分为三类:认知问题、协调问题与合作问题。 在解决认知问题时,...
有种穿越时光看过去的人如何群情激昂的感觉。。。。
评分有种穿越时光看过去的人如何群情激昂的感觉。。。。
评分有种穿越时光看过去的人如何群情激昂的感觉。。。。
评分有种穿越时光看过去的人如何群情激昂的感觉。。。。
评分有种穿越时光看过去的人如何群情激昂的感觉。。。。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有