While our culture generally trusts experts and distrusts the wisdom of the masses, New Yorker business columnist Surowiecki argues that "under the right circumstances, groups are remarkably intelligent, and are often smarter than the smartest people in them." To support this almost counterintuitive proposition, Surowiecki explores problems involving cognition (we're all trying to identify a correct answer), coordination (we need to synchronize our individual activities with others) and cooperation (we have to act together despite our self-interest). His rubric, then, covers a range of problems, including driving in traffic, competing on TV game shows, maximizing stock market performance, voting for political candidates, navigating busy sidewalks, tracking SARS and designing Internet search engines like Google. If four basic conditions are met, a crowd's "collective intelligence" will produce better outcomes than a small group of experts, Surowiecki says, even if members of the crowd don't know all the facts or choose, individually, to act irrationally. "Wise crowds" need (1) diversity of opinion; (2) independence of members from one another; (3) decentralization; and (4) a good method for aggregating opinions. The diversity brings in different information; independence keeps people from being swayed by a single opinion leader; people's errors balance each other out; and including all opinions guarantees that the results are "smarter" than if a single expert had been in charge. Surowiecki's style is pleasantly informal, a tactical disguise for what might otherwise be rather dense material. He offers a great introduction to applied behavioral economics and game theory.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
詹姆斯•索罗维基(James Surowiecki)
《纽约客》杂志特约撰稿人。他的文章见诸很多出版物,包括《纽约时报》《华尔街日报》《艺术论坛报》《连线》杂志和《候选人名单》杂志。索罗维基最初在《纽约客》杂志的“金融专版”阐述了群体智慧的思想,回答了美国社会长期以来对群体智慧和团队决策能力的质疑。
2003年,在很多的国家和地区同时经历了SARS危机。这是一种很像流感的疾病,但实验显示它不是流感病毒,而是一种新型的病毒和疾病。还没有发现SARS病源之前,人们只能通过 “隔离”的方式对付这种流行病毒。同年的3月15日,世界卫生组织与遍布世界各国和地区的11个研究实验室取...
评分2005 / 03 / 23 在政治學的研究裡,當個體行為者面臨決策時,常會受到許多因素的干擾,這些因素又可歸結於三點:誤判──資訊太多可能掩蓋重要訊息,我們必須選擇性的接收外界資訊,而這些好不容易過濾的資訊,又有可能被自己誤判;情感偏見──我們可能因為個人信仰和理念、...
评分《The Wisdom of Crowds》是James Surowiecki于2004年写就的,彼时,Web2.0还是新生事物,他还得用猜公牛体重的逸闻趣事、猜豆子的实验来佐证群体智慧的主张。而今,群体智慧的应用则俯拾皆是,不胜枚举:譬如Google的PageRank,Wiki, Imdb的推荐影片和豆瓣的推荐阅读等等。 要...
评分本周看的这两本书的主题有一些关联,放在一起评论。 《群体的智慧》是美国的一本畅销书。全书主题就是讲某些情况下群体的智慧高于个体中的专家的智慧。比如估算一头牛的体重,估算一个瓶子里的糖果的数量,群体估算值的平均数一般来所优于大部分个体的估算。并由这个话题延伸...
评分听说《乌合之众》很久没有看过,先看到了这本书。前言中叙述是为乌合之众打擂台的书觉得很兴趣。借来一阅。要想知道梨子的味道,不仅要尝尝梨子也要吃吃苹果。不然你怎知道梨子是你喜欢的呢? 书中用了大量的范例试图说明群体在决策中智慧的体现,很有说服力。就如...
有种穿越时光看过去的人如何群情激昂的感觉。。。。
评分有种穿越时光看过去的人如何群情激昂的感觉。。。。
评分有种穿越时光看过去的人如何群情激昂的感觉。。。。
评分有种穿越时光看过去的人如何群情激昂的感觉。。。。
评分有种穿越时光看过去的人如何群情激昂的感觉。。。。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有