The Politics of Modern Japan

The Politics of Modern Japan pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

出版者:Routledge
作者:Hood, Christopher 编
出品人:
页数:1792
译者:
出版时间:2008-6-26
价格:GBP 1141.82
装帧:Hardcover
isbn号码:9780415439558
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 比较政治
  • 日本政治
  • 日本
  • 政治学
  • 参考书
  • 日本政治
  • 现代日本
  • 政治学
  • 日本历史
  • 亚洲政治
  • 政治制度
  • 公共政策
  • 社会科学
  • 日本研究
  • 政治文化
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

Owing to the changing nature of Japan and its role within the world, more needs to be known of the dynamics of Japanese politics. This timely set brings together key articles on the most crucial issues facing Japanese politics today, and the relationship between Japanese politics and the main institutions including big business, the bureaucracy and the media. This is an area that has been studied by leading academics for a number of decades, but whose work has yet to be given sufficient notice or credit. With more and more students enrolling at universities to study Japan, there is a demand for books which bring comprehensive and key articles under one umbrella. To date there have been few books which have dealt with Japanese politics. Most have been on issues which are covered in articles contained in this collection.

现代日本政治的复杂图景:一部深度解析 书名:《现代日本政治的复杂图景》(暂定) 作者:[此处留空,以增强真实感] 内容简介: 本书旨在为读者提供一幅关于战后乃至当代日本政治格局的全面、深入的图景。它并非对某一特定历史时期的简单回顾,而是对支撑日本现代政治体系运行的深层结构、意识形态冲突、关键制度演变以及社会动员模式进行细致入微的解剖。全书聚焦于理解日本政治的“韧性”与“变迁”,探讨其在持续的全球化压力、人口结构剧变以及地缘政治博弈中,如何维持其独特的民主形式与治理模式。 第一部分:战后秩序的基石与结构性约束 本书的开篇着重于确立理解现代日本政治的必要历史背景和制度框架。我们首先考察“昭和遗绪”——即战败后的政治重塑——如何塑造了今日的政治生态。这包括对1947年《日本国宪法》中和平主义条款(尤其是第九条)的持续争议及其对自卫队合法性、防务政策制定的深刻影响。 体制的“一党优势”与派阀政治: 我们将深入分析自1955年以来,自由民主党(LDP)如何建立并长期维持其对国会的绝对控制。这不仅仅是简单的多数党现象,而是建立在一系列复杂的政治生态之上的:包括自民党内部强大的派阀(Habatsu)运作机制、官僚体系(特别是大藏省和后来的财务省)的强大“有权”地位,以及与经济界(Keiretsu)和媒体之间形成的微妙的“铁三角”关系。本书将通过对历次党内总裁选举的案例分析,揭示派阀政治如何成为资源分配和权力平衡的核心手段,而非仅仅是意识形态的反映。 选举制度的变迁与影响: 简要回顾战后选举制度的几次重大改革(特别是1993年的改革),分析这些改革如何试图打破传统的小选区制下对自民党有利的局面。然而,我们将论证,尽管制度有所调整,但根深蒂固的地方利益网络(如“田中角荣模式”的继承者们)和对社会稳定的追求,使得政治竞争的烈度在某些方面并未发生根本性的改变。 第二部分:意识形态的战场与身份认同的重塑 现代日本政治的核心张力,往往体现在对于“日本性”(Nihonjinron)的定义以及如何面对历史创伤的争论上。 历史修正主义与“道歉文化”的拉锯战: 本部分专门探讨围绕慰安妇问题、南京大屠杀历史叙事以及参拜靖国神社等议题的政治博弈。我们分析了保守派如何试图通过重写教科书和文化输出来重塑国家身份的努力,以及这在东亚地缘政治中所引发的强烈反应。这种对历史的持续争论,是理解当代日本外交政策和国内民族主义情绪的重要切入点。 “保守主义”的内在分歧: 日本的保守主义并非铁板一块。本书区分了以“经济自由主义”为导向的“鹰派”(如小泉纯一郎时期的改革尝试),以及以“传统价值维护”和“修宪”为核心的“国家主义”派别。分析这些不同派系在对待社会问题(如女性就业、同性婚姻、移民政策)上的立场差异,有助于理解自民党内部的意识形态光谱。 社会运动与公民社会的力量: 尽管日本的公民社会常被批评为组织松散,但本书仍关注近年来兴起的特定议题运动,例如反对安保法案的“Seiji Chieko”(政治素人)运动,以及针对核能政策和地方经济衰退的抗议活动。这些运动如何试图穿透传统的政治精英结构,是衡量日本民主活力的关键指标。 第三部分:治理的挑战:经济停滞与人口危机 现代日本政治面临的最严峻挑战,是如何管理一个长期陷入低增长泥潭、并快速走向超高龄化的社会。 “失落的三十年”的政治责任: 本章详细审视了泡沫经济破裂后,历届政府在财政刺激、结构性改革和货币政策上的反复尝试。我们分析了“安倍经济学”的“三支箭”战略,评估了其在刺激通胀和提高劳动参与率方面的成效与局限性,并探讨了对公共债务和代际公平的长期影响。政治决策者在应对结构性通缩时的犹豫不决,是理解日本经济政策“惯性”的关键。 人口结构逆转对政治的影响: 人口老龄化不再仅仅是社会问题,它已成为核心政治议题。本书探讨了养老金和医疗保健系统的财政压力,以及政治家如何在不引发选民强烈反弹的情况下推行改革。此外,我们还分析了农村地区的“消亡”对选举地理的影响,以及这如何进一步巩固了对传统农业利益的政治保护。 移民政策的矛盾性: 面对劳动力短缺,日本政府在逐步放宽技术移民政策,但其文化上的不情愿和法律上的模糊性,使得日本的移民融入问题成为一个高风险的政治敏感点。本书分析了政治精英如何在“需要劳动力”和“维护文化同质性”之间进行痛苦的平衡。 第四部分:日本的对外政策与安全战略 现代日本政治的运行,始终与它在大国博弈中的定位息息相关。 日美同盟的演变与“正常化”诉求: 本部分集中讨论日美安保条约在冷战后的持续重要性,以及对冲绳基地问题的处理如何成为日本国内政治的持续痛点。同时,我们追踪了自安倍晋三以来,日本在行使集体自卫权、深化安全合作方面的努力,分析了修宪派如何利用地区安全环境的变化来推进其“正常国家”的目标。 对华和对朝政策的战略困境: 审视日本如何在经济上依赖中国,同时在安全上与美国结盟的复杂地缘政治处境。本书分析了福岛核事故后对核能政策的重新评估,以及这如何影响其对地区核扩散的立场。面对朝鲜的导弹威胁,日本的预警系统、导弹防御体系(如“萨德”系统)的部署,均在国内引发了关于军事化程度的激烈辩论。 结论:民主的适应性与未来的不确定性 全书的结论将总结现代日本政治的突出特征——其对现状的强大维护能力(Status Quo Bias),以及在制度框架内进行渐进式调整的特点。我们强调,日本的政治体系虽然在应对速度上显得迟缓,但其基础的稳定性和法律的延续性确保了社会没有出现极端的政治撕裂。然而,本书也对新兴的挑战——从数字威权主义的外部渗透到国内青年政治参与度的下降——提出了警示,指出这些因素可能在未来几十年内,迫使这个被誉为“稳定样板”的民主国家进行更剧烈的结构性转变。

作者简介

Dr Christopher P. Hood is the Director of the Cardiff Japanese Studies Centre (Cardiff University) and an Associate Fellow at the Royal Institute of International Affairs (‘Chatham House’). His publications include Japanese Education Reform: Nakasone’s Legacy (Routledge, 2001), Doing Business with the Japanese (co-editor, Direct Image 2003) and Shinkansen - From Bullet Train to Symbol of Modern Japan (Routledge, 2006).

目录信息

Volume I: Politics and Society
Christopher P. Hood, ‘Introduction: The Importance of Japanese Politics’.
1. Bradley Richardson and Dennis Patterson, ‘Political Traditions and Political Change: The Significance of Postwar Japanese Politics for Political Science, Annual Review of Political Science, 2001, 4, pp. 94–111.
2. Inoguchi Takashi ‘Social Capital in Japan’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2000, 1.1, pp. 73–112.
3. Patrick Köllner, ‘Factionalism in Japanese Political Parties Revisited or How do Factions in the LDP and DPJ Differ?’, Japan Forum, 2004, 16.1, pp. 87–109.
4. Sean Richey and Ikeda Ken’ichi, ‘The Influence of Political Discussion on Policy Preference: A Comparison of the United States and Japan’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2006, 7.3, pp. 272–88.
5. Ethan Scheiner, ‘Pipelines of Pork: Japanese Politics and a Model of Local Opposition Party Failure’, Comparative Political Studies, 2005, 38, pp. 799–823.
6. Aurelia George Mulgan, ‘Japan’s Interventionist State: Bringing Agriculture Back In’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.1, pp. 29–61.
7. Christopher P. Hood, ‘From Polling Station to Political Station? Politics and the Shinkansen’, Japan Forum, 2006, 18.1, pp. 45–63.
8. Ian Holliday and Shinoda Tomohito, ‘Governing from the Centre: Core Executive Capacity in Britain and Japan’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2002, 3.1, pp. 91–111.
9. Ito Shin’ichiro, ‘Shaping Policy Diffusion: Event History Analyses of Regional Laws in Japanese Prefectures’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2001, 2.2, pp. 211–35.
10. Michael Laver and Kenneth Benoit, ‘Estimating Party Policy Positions: Japan in Comparative Context’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.2, pp. 187–209.
11. Gary W. Cox, M. Masuyama, and M. D. McCubbins, ‘Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2000, 1.1, pp. 1–21.
12. Robert Huckfeldt, Ikeda Ken’ichi, and Franz Urban Pappi, ‘Political Expertise, Interdependent Citizens, and the Value Added Problem in Democratic Politics’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2000, 1.2, pp. 171–95.
13. J. A. A. Stockwin, ‘To Oppose or Appease? Parties Out of Power and the Need for Real Politics in Japan’, Japan Forum, 2006, 18.1, pp. 115–32.
14. Andrew Dewit and Sven Steinmo, ‘The Political Economy of Taxes and Redistribution in Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2002, 5.2, pp. 159–78.
15. James Babb, ‘Two Currents of Conservatism in Modern Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2002, 5.2, pp. 215–32.
16. Rikki Kersten, ‘Revisionism, Reaction and the "Symbol Emperor" in Post-war Japan’, Japan Forum, 2003, 15.1, pp. 15–31.
17. Robert Aspinall and Peter Cave, ‘Lowering the Flag: Democracy, Authority, and Rights at Tokorozawa High School’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2001, 4.1, pp. 77–93.
18. Curtis H. Martin, ‘The Sinking of the Ehime Maru: The Interaction of Culture, Security Interests and Domestic Politics in an Alliance Crisis’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2004, 5.2, pp. 287–310.
Volume II: The Prime Minister and Change
Christopher P. Hood, ‘Introduction: Responding to Change and Making Changes’.
19. Patrick Koellner, ‘The Liberal Democratic Party at 50: Sources of Dominance and Changes in the Koizumi Era’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2006, 9.2, pp. 243–57.
20. Takayasu Kensuke, ‘Prime-Ministerial Power in Japan: A Re-examination’, Japan Forum, 2005, 17.2, pp. 163–84.
21. Richard J. Samuels, ‘Leadership and Political Change in Japan: The Case of the Second Rincho’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 2003, 29.1, pp. 1–31.
22. Ellis S. Krauss and Benjamin Nyblade, ‘Presidentialization in Japan? The Prime Minister, Media and Elections in Japan’, British Journal of Political Science, 2005, 35, pp. 357–68.
23. Kabashima Ikuo and Gill Steel, ‘How Junichiro Koizumi Seized the Leadership of Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2007, 8.1, pp. 95–114.
24. Park Cheol Hee, ‘Political Dynamics of Regime Transformation in Japan in the 1990s’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2004, 5.2, pp. 311–22.
25. Stephen R. Reed, ‘Political Reform in Japan: Combining Scientific and Historical Analysis’, Social Science Japan Journal, 1999, 2.2, pp. 177–93.
26. S. Javed Maswood and SadahiroYukio, ‘A Tale of Two Japans: Reform in a Divided Polity’, Japan Forum, 2003, 15.1, pp. 33–53.
27. John Creighton Campbell, ‘Administrative Reform as Policy Change and Policy Non-Change’, Social Science Japan Journal, 1999, 2.2, pp. 157–76.
28. Takaaki Suzuki, ‘Administrative Reform and the Politics of Budgetary Retrenchment in Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 1999, 2.2, pp. 195–213.
29. Kawabata Eiji, ‘Dual Governance: The Contemporary Politics of Posts and Telecommunications in Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2004, 7.1, pp. 21–39.
30. Patricia L. MacLachlan, ‘Storming the Castle: The Battle for Postal Reform in Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2006, 9.1, pp. 1–18.
31. Frank Schwartz, ‘Civil Society in Japan Reconsidered’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2002, 3.2, pp. 195–215.
32. Patricia L. MacLachlan, ‘Japanese Civil Society in the Age of Deregulation: The Case of Consumers’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2002, 3.2, pp. 217–42.
33. Seung-Mi Han, ‘From the Communitarian Ideal to the Public Sphere: The Making of Foreigners’ Assemblies in Kawasaki City and Kanagawa Prefecture’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2004, 7.1, pp. 41–60.
34. Masaki Taniguchi, ‘Changing Media, Changing Politics in Japan’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2007, 8.1, pp. 147–66.
35. Iida Yumiko, ‘Media Politics and Reified Nation: Japanese Culture and Politics Under Information Capitalism’, Japanese Studies, 2003, 23.1, pp. 23–42.
36. Nanri Keizo, ‘The Conundrum of Japanese Editorials: Polarized, Diversified and Homogeneous’, Japanese Studies, 2005, 25.2, pp. 169–85.
37. David M. Potter and Douglas van Belle, ‘News Media Coverage Influence on Japan’s Foreign Aid Allocations’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2004, 5.1, pp. 113–35.
Volume III: Japanese Politics on the International Stage
Christopher P. Hood, ‘Introduction: Pragmatic and Cooperative, but Sometimes Alone’
38. Bert Edström, ‘The Yoshida Doctrine and the Unipolar World’, Japan Forum, 2004, 16.1, pp. 63–85.
39. Ishizuka Katsumi, ‘Japan and UN Peace Operations’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2004, 5.1, pp. 137–57.
40. Shinoda Tomohito, ‘Japan’s Top-Down Policy Process to Dispatch the SDF to Iraq’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2006, 7.1, pp. 71–91.
41. Linus Hagström, ‘Ubiquity of "Power" and the Advantage of Terminological Pluralism: Japan’s Foreign Policy Discourse’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.2, pp. 145–64.
42. Davis B. Bobrow and Mark A. Boyer, ‘Public Opinion and International Policy Choices: Global Commitments for Japan and Its Peers?’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2001, 2.1, pp. 67–95.
43. Rikki Kersten, ‘Neo-nationalism and the "Liberal School of History"’, Japan Forum, 1999, 11.2, pp. 191–203.
44. Caroline Rose, ‘"Patriotism is Not Taboo": Nationalism in China and Japan and Implications for Sino-Japanese Relations’, Japan Forum, 2000, 12.2, pp. 169–81.
45. Caroline Rose, ‘The Textbook Issue: Domestic Sources of Japan’s Foreign Policy’, Japan Forum, 1999, 11.2, pp. 205–16.
46. Sakaedani Akiko ‘2002 FIFA World Cup and its Effects on the Reconciliation Between Japan and the Republic of Korea’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.2, pp. 233–57.
47. Julie Gilson and Phillida Purvis, ‘Japan’s Pursuit of Human Security: Humanitarian Agenda or Political Pragmatism’, Japan Forum, 2003, 15.2, pp. 193–207.
48. Bert Edström, ‘Japan’s Foreign Policy and Human Security’, Japan Forum, 2003, 15.2, pp. 209–25.
49. Lydia N. Yu-Jose, ‘Global Environmental Issues: Responses from Japan’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2004, 5.1, pp. 23–50.
50. Hirata Keiko, ‘Beached Whales: Examining Japan’s Rejection of an International Norm’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2004, 7.2, pp. 177–97.
51. Ian Holliday, ‘Japan and the Myanmar Stalemate: Regional Power and Resolution of a Regional Problem’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.3, pp. 393–410.
52. Ji You, ‘East Asian Community: A New Platform for Sino-Japanese Cooperation and Contention’, Japanese Studies, 2006, 26.1, pp. 19–28.
53. Terada Takashi, ‘Forming an East Asian Community: A Site for Japan-China Power Struggles’, Japanese Studies, 2006, 26.1, pp. 5–17.
54. Shinoda Tomohito, ‘Ozawa Ichiro as an Actor in Foreign Policy-Making’, Japan Forum, 2004, 16.1, pp. 37–61.
Volume IV: Elections and Changes in Japanese Society
Christopher P. Hood, ‘Introduction: Elections: Reflecting Japan or the Politicians?’
55. Ellis S. Krauss and Robert Pekkanen, ‘Explaining Party Adaptation to Electoral Reform: The Discreet Charm of the LDP?’, Journal of Japanese Studies, 2004, 30.1, pp. 1–34.
56. Margarita Estévez-Abe, ‘Japan’s Shift Toward a Westminster System: A Structural Analysis of the 2005 Lower House Election and its Aftermath’, Asian Survey, 2006, 46.4, pp. 632–51.
57. Patrick Fournier and Kohno Masaru, ‘Japan’s Multimember SNTV System and Strategic Voting: The "M + 1 Rule" and Beyond’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2000, 1.2, pp. 275–93.
58. Jonathan Lewis and Brian J. Masshardt, ‘Election Posters in Japan’, Japan Forum, 2002, 14.3, pp. 373–404.
59. Hizen Yoichi, ‘The Effect of Dual Candidacy on Voting Decisions’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2006, 7.3, pp. 289–306.
60. Karen E. Cox and Leonard J. Schoppa, ‘Interaction Effects in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Theory and Evidence from Germany, Japan, and Italy’, Comparative Political Studies, 2002, 35, pp. 1027–53.
61. Patrick Köllner, ‘Upper House Elections in Japan and the Power of the "Organized Vote"’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2002, 3.1, pp. 113–37.
62. George Ehrhardt, ‘Factional Influence on the 2001 LDP Primaries: A Quantitative Analysis’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2006, 7.1, pp. 59–69.
63. Kawato Sadafumi, ‘Strategic Contexts of the Vote on Political Reform Bills’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2000, 1.1, pp. 23–51.
64. Steven R. Reed and Ethan Scheiner, ‘Electoral Incentives and Policy Preferences: Mixed Motives Behind Party Defections in Japan’, British Journal of Political Science, 2003, 33.3, pp. 469–90.
65. Kabashima Ikuo and Steven R. Reed, ‘Voter Reactions to "Strange Bedfellows": The Japanese Voter Faces a Kaleidoscope of Changing Coalitions’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2000, 1.2, pp. 229–48.
66. Chieko Numata, ‘Checking the Center: Popular Referenda in Japan’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2006, 9.1, pp. 19–31.
67. Sherry L. Martin, ‘Alienated, Independent and Female: Lessons from the Japanese Electorate’, Social Science Japan Journal, 2004, 7.1, pp. 1–19.
68. Catherine Bochel and Hugh Bochel, ‘Exploring the Low Levels of Women’s Representation in Japanese Local Government’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.3, pp. 375–92.
69. Maeda Yukio, ‘External Constraints on Female Political Participation’, Japanese Journal of Political Science, 2005, 6.3, pp. 345–73.
70. Takeda Hiroko, ‘Gendering the Japanese Political System: The Gender-Specific Pattern of Political Activity and Women’s Political Participation’, Japanese Studies, 2006, 26.2, pp. 185–98.
71. Tsunematsu Naomi, ‘Gender Power Under Female Leadership: A Local Women’s Association in Japan’, Japanese Studies, 2004, 24.1, pp. 97–114.
· · · · · · (收起)

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有