In the space of barely fifteen years, the history of masculinity has become an important dimension of social and cultural history. John Tosh has been in the forefront of the field since the beginning, having written A Man,s Place: Masculinity and the Middle-Class Home in Victorian England (1999), and co-edited Manful Assertions: Masculinities in Britainsince 1800 (1991). Here he brings together nine key articles which he has written over the past ten years. These pieces document the aspirations of the first contributors to the field, and the development of an agenda of key historical issues which have become central to our conceptualising of gender in history. Later essays take up the issue of periodisation and the relationship of masculinity to other historical identities and structures, particularly in the context of the family. The last two essays, published for the first time, approach British imperial history in a fresh way. They argue that the empire needs to be seen as a specifically male enterprise, answering to masculine aspirations and insecurities. This leads to illuminating insights into the nature of colonial emigration and the popular investment in empire during the era the New Imperialism. Related Titles The Making of Modern Woman/Abrams/0582414105/2002 Gender and the Historian/Alberti/0582404630/2002 Family Matters/Peplar/0582418704/2002
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
“Furthermore, if feminists were serious about understanding the historical dynamic of women’s oppression, they must investigate the nature of men’s stake in that oppression: gender was a power structure which must be analyzed as a system embracing both sexes.”
评分“Furthermore, if feminists were serious about understanding the historical dynamic of women’s oppression, they must investigate the nature of men’s stake in that oppression: gender was a power structure which must be analyzed as a system embracing both sexes.”
评分“Furthermore, if feminists were serious about understanding the historical dynamic of women’s oppression, they must investigate the nature of men’s stake in that oppression: gender was a power structure which must be analyzed as a system embracing both sexes.”
评分“Furthermore, if feminists were serious about understanding the historical dynamic of women’s oppression, they must investigate the nature of men’s stake in that oppression: gender was a power structure which must be analyzed as a system embracing both sexes.”
评分“Furthermore, if feminists were serious about understanding the historical dynamic of women’s oppression, they must investigate the nature of men’s stake in that oppression: gender was a power structure which must be analyzed as a system embracing both sexes.”
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有