Financial collapses--whether of the junk bond market, the Internet bubble, or the highly leveraged housing market--are often explained as the inevitable results of market cycles: What goes up must come down. In Liquidated, Karen Ho punctures the aura of the abstract, all-powerful market to show how financial markets, and particularly booms and busts, are constructed. Through an in-depth investigation into the everyday experiences and ideologies of Wall Street investment bankers, Ho describes how a financially dominant but highly unstable market system is understood, justified, and produced through the restructuring of corporations and the larger economy. Ho, who worked at an investment bank herself, argues that bankers' approaches to financial markets and corporate America are inseparable from the structures and strategies of their workplaces. Her ethnographic analysis of those workplaces is filled with the voices of stressed first-year associates, overworked and alienated analysts, undergraduates eager to be hired, and seasoned managing directors. Recruited from elite universities as "the best and the brightest," investment bankers are socialized into a world of high risk and high reward. They are paid handsomely, with the understanding that they may be let go at any time. Their workplace culture and networks of privilege create the perception that job insecurity builds character and employee liquidity results in smart, efficient business. Based on this culture of liquidity and compensation practices tied to profligate deal-making, Wall Street investment bankers reshape corporate America in their own image. Their mission is the creation of shareholder value, but Ho demonstrates that their practices and assumptions often produce crises instead. By connecting the values and actions of investment bankers to the construction of markets and the restructuring of U.S. corporations, Liquidated reveals the particular culture of Wall Street often obscured by triumphalist readings of capitalist globalization.
何柔宛(Karen Ho),普林斯顿大学人类学博士,明尼苏达大学人类学系教授,研究方向为华尔街制度文化、美国企业裁员现象和新自由主义。
我没有受过社会学的专业训练,不知道从社会学专业的角度如何评价这本书。作为一个普通读者,只能说这本书挺让人失望的。 这本书花了大量篇幅反复强调投行工作时间长、薪酬水平高、流动性大这些非常显而易见的事实。问题是这些简单的事实完全可以通过统计数字做出全局性的描述,...
评分第一章:其实就是说通过“名校”的隐秘光环,塑造一种大家都是聪明人的标准,这种单一的聪明标准、违反了多元化、种族平等的政治正确。 第二章还没看完:大致描述了投行的等级制度和如何压榨新人的时间。里头有一个段子说投行6点半给点外卖、8点给报销打车。让我想到了我大互联...
评分从哈佛毕业后,哈佛毕业生们就要去寻找最能符合哈佛毕业生身份的工作,离开了大学里哈佛,也要生活在各行各业里的哈佛。而唯一能符合哈佛身份的工作,就是华尔街。华尔街因为你的哈佛身份招聘了你,并不在乎你的专业技能,这也就导致了他们招聘来的是一个“哈佛人”的商标,而...
评分从哈佛毕业后,哈佛毕业生们就要去寻找最能符合哈佛毕业生身份的工作,离开了大学里哈佛,也要生活在各行各业里的哈佛。而唯一能符合哈佛身份的工作,就是华尔街。华尔街因为你的哈佛身份招聘了你,并不在乎你的专业技能,这也就导致了他们招聘来的是一个“哈佛人”的商标,而...
评分这是一个一堆之前大约除了去银行存钱之外从没了解过金融业的人,也能靠着几段舶来的对于CDS或是MBS的评论,指着金融衍生品摇头说,“坏极坏极”的时代。 大约从2008年9月以来(甚至更早),金融业便变得名声狼籍,几乎被扣上祸国殃民的帽子。在美国,“贪婪短视”的银行...
所以说我可以给。。某些人写作业不是吹牛的。
评分所以说我可以给。。某些人写作业不是吹牛的。
评分所以说我可以给。。某些人写作业不是吹牛的。
评分所以说我可以给。。某些人写作业不是吹牛的。
评分人类学家,人种学家,来研究华尔街,咋一看,跨界嘛,再一想,啊,华尔街的人和我们已经不是一个人种了!不过这样的混合,确实带来了新的视野和观点,好书!
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有