Introducing a new and ambitious position in the field, Kit Fine’s Semantic Relationism is a major contribution to the philosophy of language. A major contribution to the philosophy of language, now available in paperback Written by one of today’s most respected philosophers Argues for a fundamentally new approach to the study of representation in language and thought Proposes that there may be representational relationships between expressions or elements of thought that are not grounded in the intrinsic representational features of the expressions or elements themselves Forms part of the prestigious new Blackwell/Brown Lectures in Philosophy series, based on an ongoing series of lectures by today’s leading philosophers
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
Fine的觀點太過極端，我現在也無法評價為瞭解決弗雷格之謎剋裏普剋之謎還有Mates之謎，是不是真的除瞭給每個詞語都配上(intrinsic)semantic value，還需要加上semantic relation，比如coordination
评分感受：這個方案最後有可能栽在這個問題上：現在我已經按照Relationism的路綫走瞭，可是，你告訴我，到底該“如何”識彆coordinated content & uncoordinated content呢？Old-fashioned Fregeans與Way-based semantics of aboutness似乎依舊可以在這個論題上殺迴來。(Incrementality vs. Interactiveness)
评分感受：這個方案最後有可能栽在這個問題上：現在我已經按照Relationism的路綫走瞭，可是，你告訴我，到底該“如何”識彆coordinated content & uncoordinated content呢？Old-fashioned Fregeans與Way-based semantics of aboutness似乎依舊可以在這個論題上殺迴來。(Incrementality vs. Interactiveness)
评分感受：這個方案最後有可能栽在這個問題上：現在我已經按照Relationism的路綫走瞭，可是，你告訴我，到底該“如何”識彆coordinated content & uncoordinated content呢？Old-fashioned Fregeans與Way-based semantics of aboutness似乎依舊可以在這個論題上殺迴來。(Incrementality vs. Interactiveness)
评分Fine的觀點太過極端，我現在也無法評價為瞭解決弗雷格之謎剋裏普剋之謎還有Mates之謎，是不是真的除瞭給每個詞語都配上(intrinsic)semantic value，還需要加上semantic relation，比如coordination
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有