Listen to a short interview with Rawi Abdelal. Host: Chris Gondek. Producer: Heron & Crane. The rise of global financial markets in the last decades of the twentieth century was premised on one fundamental idea: that capital ought to flow across country borders with minimal restriction and regulation. Freedom for capital movements became the new orthodoxy. In an intellectual, legal, and political history of financial globalization, Rawi Abdelal shows that this was not always the case. Transactions routinely executed by bankers, managers, and investors during the 1990s - trading foreign stocks and bonds, borrowing in foreign currencies - had been illegal in many countries only decades, and sometimes just a year or two, earlier. How and why did the world shift from an orthodoxy of free capital movements in 1914 to an orthodoxy of capital controls in 1944 and then back again by 1994? How have such standards of appropriate behavior been codified and transmitted internationally? Contrary to conventional accounts, Abdelal argues that neither the U.S. Treasury nor Wall Street bankers have preferred or promoted multilateral, liberal rules for global finance. Instead, European policy makers conceived and promoted the liberal rules that compose the international financial architecture. Whereas U.S. policy makers have tended to embrace unilateral, ad hoc globalization, French and European policy makers have promoted a rule-based, 'managed' globalization. This contest over the character of globalization continues today.
評分
評分
評分
評分
說新自由主義的興起並非美國的推動,而是法國左翼的推動,裏麵當然有閤理的成分,不過感覺這個論調還是有些嘩眾取寵……
评分說新自由主義的興起並非美國的推動,而是法國左翼的推動,裏麵當然有閤理的成分,不過感覺這個論調還是有些嘩眾取寵……
评分說新自由主義的興起並非美國的推動,而是法國左翼的推動,裏麵當然有閤理的成分,不過感覺這個論調還是有些嘩眾取寵……
评分說新自由主義的興起並非美國的推動,而是法國左翼的推動,裏麵當然有閤理的成分,不過感覺這個論調還是有些嘩眾取寵……
评分說新自由主義的興起並非美國的推動,而是法國左翼的推動,裏麵當然有閤理的成分,不過感覺這個論調還是有些嘩眾取寵……
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有