In a provocative book-length essay, Patricia Lynne argues that most programmatic assessment of student writing in U.S. public and higher education is conceived in the terms of mid-20th century positivism. Since composition as a field had found its most compatible home in constructivism, she asks, why do compositionists import a conceptual frame for assessment that is incompatible with composition theory? By casting this as a clash of paradigms, Lynne is able to highlight the ways in which each theory can and cannot influence the shape of assessment within composition. She laments, as do many in composition, that the objectively oriented paradigm of educational assessment theory subjugates and discounts the very social constructionist principles that empower composition pedagogy. Further, Lynne criticizes recent practice for accommodating the big business of educational testingespecially for capitulating to the discourse of positivism embedded in terms like 'validity' and 'reliability.' These terms and concepts, she argues, have little theoretical significance within composition studies, and their technical and philosophical import are downplayed by composition assessment scholars. There is a need, Lynne says, for terms of assessment that are native to composition. To open this needed discussion within the field, she analyzes cutting-edge assessment efforts, including the work of Broad and Haswell, and she advances a set of alternate terms for evaluating assessment practices, a set of terms grounded in constructivism and composition. Coming to Terms is ambitious and principled, and it takes a controversial stand on important issues. This strong new volume in assessment theory will be of serious interest to assessment specialists and their students, to composition theorists, and to those now mounting assessments in their own programs.
评分
评分
评分
评分
老实讲,阅读这本书的过程,更像是一场智力上的探险。我发现自己不断地停下来,尝试去预测下一步的发展,但作者总能在我自以为洞悉一切的时候,抛出一个全新的维度。这本书的结构精巧得像一个复杂的机械装置,每一个齿轮的咬合都严丝合缝。它不仅在讲述一个引人入胜的故事,更像是在探讨某种哲学命题,那些关于选择、代价和命运的探讨,虽然没有直接给出答案,却能激起读者强烈的反思欲望。我特别喜欢作者处理冲突的方式,不是简单地爆发,而是像冰层下的暗涌,持续地施加压力,直到临界点爆发,那种情绪的释放非常有力且真实。这本书绝对属于那种值得收藏、时不时翻阅,每次都会有新体会的佳作。
评分坦白说,我原本对这种题材的书不太抱有太大期望,总觉得情节会有些老套,但这次我彻底错了。这本书的叙事角度非常新颖,采用了多线叙事的结构,看似分散,实则暗流涌动,将所有线索巧妙地汇聚在一起,那种豁然开朗的感觉,简直是阅读的至高享受。作者的语言风格有一种魔力,时而古典含蓄,时而现代犀利,切换自如,却总能精准地抓住读者的心。我尤其欣赏作者在描写环境时的功力,那些场景描写仿佛带着气味和温度,让我身临其境。这本书的节奏感把握得极好,快的时候紧张得我手心冒汗,慢下来的时候又让人有足够的时间去感受那种潜藏的张力。看完之后,我立刻向身边的朋友们大力推荐,因为它带来的那种阅读的“冲击感”是久违了的,值得反复品味。
评分这本书真是让人欲罢不能,沉浸其中,仿佛自己也成了故事里的人物。作者的笔触细腻入微,对人物心理的刻画极其到位,那些复杂的情感纠葛,那些细微的挣扎,都被描绘得淋漓尽致。我常常在阅读时停下来,细细回味某一句精妙的对话,或者某个场景的意境。它不仅仅是在讲述一个故事,更像是在探讨人性的深度,揭示了我们在面对困境时最真实的样子。情节的推进张弛有度,高潮迭起却又不失铺垫,每一次转折都出乎意料又在情理之中。更让我赞叹的是,作者构建的世界观宏大而又严谨,每一个细节都经得起推敲,读完后久久不能忘怀,感觉自己的认知边界似乎都被拓宽了许多。这本书的价值,远不止于消遣娱乐,它更像是一面镜子,映照出我们自身,引人深思。
评分这本书给我的感觉是,它成功地避开了所有陈词滥调,带来了一股清新的空气。它不追求宏大的史诗叙事,而是专注于个体在特定环境下的挣扎与成长,这种“微观”的视角反而更具穿透力。角色的塑造尤其出色,没有绝对的好人或坏人,每个人都有其不可推解的动机和灰色地带,这使得整个故事充满了现实的质感。我花了很长时间才从故事的氛围中抽离出来,因为作者营造的那种情绪的粘稠感太强了。从排版到用词,都能感受到编辑和作者对这本书的用心,每一个标点符号似乎都安置在了最恰当的位置。对于那些追求深度和内涵,厌倦了快餐式阅读的读者来说,这绝对是一剂良药,它需要你投入时间,但回报是巨大的精神满足感。
评分我很少用“震撼”这个词来形容阅读体验,但这本书确实做到了。它以一种近乎残酷的坦诚,剖析了人性在极端条件下的扭曲与坚韧。故事的氛围营造非常成功,那种压抑感和希望并存的张力,让人心头一紧。作者的文字功底深厚,遣词造句精准到位,尤其是一些意象的运用,极具画面感和象征意义,常常一句话就能勾勒出复杂的内心世界。这本书的叙事节奏处理得非常高明,它让你感到时间仿佛被拉长或压缩,完全服从于故事的内在逻辑。对于那些追求文学性和思想深度的读者来说,这绝对是一次不容错过的阅读盛宴,它不仅娱乐了我的闲暇时光,更在相当长的一段时间内占据了我的思想空间,让我不断回味其中的细节和隐喻。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有