When Curt Flood, all-star center fielder for the St. Louis Cardinals, refused to be traded to the Philadelphia Phillies in 1968, he sent shock waves throughout professional baseball that ultimately reached the Supreme Court. Flood challenged the game's reserve clause system that bound players to teams as if they were property; and while others had previously spoken out against this arrangement, protected by Congress and the courts for a century, he was the first to pursue his grievance as doggedly or as far. Robert Goldman now offers a new look at Flood's efforts to shake the foundations of major league baseball. One Man Out takes readers back to the pre-steroid era when baseball was as much a passion as a pastime-- and when race was often still a factor--to focus on decisions made in the courtrooms rather than the dugouts. Flood claimed that the prevailing system was illegal because it violated the Sherman antitrust laws by allowing teams to monopolize the sport in a way that impeded players' freedom and financial gain--and was even unconstitutional because it, in effect, imposed a form of slavery. Baseball owners countered that players owed their success to the reserve system because it maintained competitive balance among teams and heightened interest in the game, which helped fund their high salaries. Although the Supreme Court ruled against Flood, it left the door open to legislation that would remove baseball's special exemption from antitrust regulation and to future collective bargaining. With its credibility enhanced, the players' union continued negotiations until it finally won a version of free agency very similar to Flood's, with his final vindication coming in the form ofthe Curt Flood Act of 1998. In replaying the confrontation between Flood and baseball commissioner Bowie Kuhn, Goldman demonstrates that even a lost lawsuit, with its game-like competition, can be a landmark. And by telling the inside story of the case, he highlights a key labor relations issue in America's most popular sport. Concise and balanced, and written in a fast-paced narrative style, One Man Out reminds students, general readers, and fans that Flood holds a unique and important place in both baseball and American law.
评分
评分
评分
评分
读完后,我有一种强烈的冲动想要立刻与人讨论其中的哲学思辨。这本书的叙事手法非常新颖,它似乎在挑战传统小说的边界,用一种近乎意识流的方式,将读者拉入一个错综复杂的情感迷宫。语言的张力十足,很多句子读起来朗朗上口,却又蕴含着哲学的重量。我特别喜欢作者构建的那个独特的微观世界,在那里,日常的琐碎被赋予了超乎寻常的象征意义。这使得阅读过程充满了智力上的乐趣,每解决一个叙事上的谜团,都带来巨大的满足感。然而,这种高度的文学性和思辨性也意味着它可能不适合所有读者,它要求读者投入百分之百的专注力。但对于那些愿意沉浸其中的人来说,回报是巨大的,它会真正地拓宽你的思维边界,让你对“叙事”本身产生新的理解。
评分说实话,这本书的开篇有些慢热,我差点以为自己要放弃了,但一旦情节真正铺展开来,那种强大的吸引力就让人无法抗拒。它成功地营造了一种独特的氛围,带着一丝挥之不去的忧郁和宿命感。角色的塑造极其立体,他们都不是非黑即白的类型,每个人都有自己的灰色地带和不可告人的秘密,这种真实感让人既同情又警惕。特别是配角群体,每一个都像是精心雕琢的艺术品,他们的出现不仅仅是为了推动主线,更是为了从不同的侧面映照出主角的挣扎。我为某些角色的命运感到深深的惋惜,作者毫不留情地展现了人性的脆弱与坚韧并存的矛盾状态。这本书在情绪的调动上非常高明,它让你笑,让你怒,最后留下的却是一种深沉的平静。
评分这本书的细节处理达到了令人发指的程度。我甚至怀疑作者是不是在写作之前,对故事发生的地域和历史背景做了极其详尽的田野调查。你会闻到空气中泥土和旧书本的味道,能感受到季节的更替对人物心情的影响。这种身临其境的感觉,是很多大制作的影视作品都难以达到的。虽然故事的主线是关于某某事件的探索,但真正吸引我的,是那些穿插在主线旁边的次要叙述,它们像精美的插花,丰富了整体的视觉和情感体验。它是一本需要反复阅读的书,因为每一次重读,你都会发现之前因专注于主线而忽略掉的那些隐藏在文字缝隙中的小彩蛋和微妙的伏笔。对于那些热爱“深度挖掘”的读者来说,这绝对是一场盛宴。
评分这本小说简直让人爱不释手,情节跌宕起伏,每个转折都出乎意料。作者的笔触极其细腻,对于人物心理的刻画入木三分,让你仿佛能感受到主角内心的挣扎与狂喜。我尤其欣赏它对社会现实的深刻反思,那种不加修饰的真实感,让人在阅读过程中不断追问自我存在的意义。故事的节奏把握得恰到好处,时而紧凑得让人喘不过气,时而又缓缓铺陈,让你有时间细细品味那些精妙的对话和环境描写。看完之后,那种意犹未尽的感觉久久不能散去,我甚至会时不时地回想起书中的某个场景,默默地揣摩其中更深层次的含义。这本书无疑是今年我读到的最有深度、最引人入胜的作品之一,强烈推荐给所有追求高质量阅读体验的读者。它不仅仅是一个故事,更像是一次对人性的深度探险,充满了智慧的光芒和对生活复杂性的深刻洞察。
评分我必须赞扬这本书的勇气。它毫不畏惧地触碰了一些社会上普遍回避的敏感话题,但处理方式却充满了克制与智慧,没有流于说教或煽情。作者似乎拥有一种罕见的能力,能将宏大的主题融入到极其私密和个人化的叙事之中,使得那些抽象的概念变得可触可感。整本书的结构设计非常巧妙,它采用了非线性的叙事方式,但逻辑链条却异常清晰,显示出作者高超的掌控力。读到最后,那种豁然开朗的感觉,并非是所有谜团都被简单地揭开,而是你明白了,有些事情,其复杂性本身就是答案的一部分。这是一部需要静下心来品味的作品,它教会我在混乱中寻找秩序,在沉默中倾听回响。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有