具體描述
著者簡介
圖書目錄
the development of Hare's moral philosophy, W.D.Hudson.
Part 2 Critics: act-utilitarianism and meta-ethics, R.B.Brandt;
Hare on the levels of moral thinking, William K.Frandena;
Hare's analysis of "Ought" and its implications, Allan Gibbard;
problems with act-utilitarianism and with malevolent preferences, John C.Harsanyi;
the foundations of impartiality, Thomas Nagel;
prescriptivism, constructivism and rights, David A.J.Richards;
levels of moral thinking, T.M.Scanlon;
reasoning towards utilitarianism, Peter Singer;
Hare on intuitive moral thinking, J.O.Urmson;
changing places?, Zeno Vendler;
the structure of Hare's theory, Bernard Williams.
· · · · · · (收起)
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
在認識和實踐等方麵的追問，（可能由於篇幅限製）緊緻得體（感覺還能夠再壓縮），問題質量啊很好，不過大部分好似沒有區分標準和方法（這個區分到00年代仿似就很廣泛瞭），它或能在更深處攪亂大傢的論證所隱含的“不能夠推齣不應當”。Hudson, Gibbard, Harsanyi尤其值得讀，黑爾的迴應清晰到頁碼行碼，非常貼心。"It is a mistake to think that, because we could not have a word in our language without accepting some substantial principle, the principle itself holds analytically. "
评分在認識和實踐等方麵的追問，（可能由於篇幅限製）緊緻得體（感覺還能夠再壓縮），問題質量啊很好，不過大部分好似沒有區分標準和方法（這個區分到00年代仿似就很廣泛瞭），它或能在更深處攪亂大傢的論證所隱含的“不能夠推齣不應當”。Hudson, Gibbard, Harsanyi尤其值得讀，黑爾的迴應清晰到頁碼行碼，非常貼心。"It is a mistake to think that, because we could not have a word in our language without accepting some substantial principle, the principle itself holds analytically. "
评分在認識和實踐等方麵的追問，（可能由於篇幅限製）緊緻得體（感覺還能夠再壓縮），問題質量啊很好，不過大部分好似沒有區分標準和方法（這個區分到00年代仿似就很廣泛瞭），它或能在更深處攪亂大傢的論證所隱含的“不能夠推齣不應當”。Hudson, Gibbard, Harsanyi尤其值得讀，黑爾的迴應清晰到頁碼行碼，非常貼心。"It is a mistake to think that, because we could not have a word in our language without accepting some substantial principle, the principle itself holds analytically. "
评分在認識和實踐等方麵的追問，（可能由於篇幅限製）緊緻得體（感覺還能夠再壓縮），問題質量啊很好，不過大部分好似沒有區分標準和方法（這個區分到00年代仿似就很廣泛瞭），它或能在更深處攪亂大傢的論證所隱含的“不能夠推齣不應當”。Hudson, Gibbard, Harsanyi尤其值得讀，黑爾的迴應清晰到頁碼行碼，非常貼心。"It is a mistake to think that, because we could not have a word in our language without accepting some substantial principle, the principle itself holds analytically. "
评分在認識和實踐等方麵的追問，（可能由於篇幅限製）緊緻得體（感覺還能夠再壓縮），問題質量啊很好，不過大部分好似沒有區分標準和方法（這個區分到00年代仿似就很廣泛瞭），它或能在更深處攪亂大傢的論證所隱含的“不能夠推齣不應當”。Hudson, Gibbard, Harsanyi尤其值得讀，黑爾的迴應清晰到頁碼行碼，非常貼心。"It is a mistake to think that, because we could not have a word in our language without accepting some substantial principle, the principle itself holds analytically. "
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有