具体描述
作者简介
目录信息
the development of Hare's moral philosophy, W.D.Hudson.
Part 2 Critics: act-utilitarianism and meta-ethics, R.B.Brandt;
Hare on the levels of moral thinking, William K.Frandena;
Hare's analysis of "Ought" and its implications, Allan Gibbard;
problems with act-utilitarianism and with malevolent preferences, John C.Harsanyi;
the foundations of impartiality, Thomas Nagel;
prescriptivism, constructivism and rights, David A.J.Richards;
levels of moral thinking, T.M.Scanlon;
reasoning towards utilitarianism, Peter Singer;
Hare on intuitive moral thinking, J.O.Urmson;
changing places?, Zeno Vendler;
the structure of Hare's theory, Bernard Williams.
· · · · · · (收起)
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
在认识和实践等方面的追问，（可能由于篇幅限制）紧致得体（感觉还能够再压缩），问题质量啊很好，不过大部分好似没有区分标准和方法（这个区分到00年代仿似就很广泛了），它或能在更深处搅乱大家的论证所隐含的“不能够推出不应当”。Hudson, Gibbard, Harsanyi尤其值得读，黑尔的回应清晰到页码行码，非常贴心。"It is a mistake to think that, because we could not have a word in our language without accepting some substantial principle, the principle itself holds analytically. "
评分在认识和实践等方面的追问，（可能由于篇幅限制）紧致得体（感觉还能够再压缩），问题质量啊很好，不过大部分好似没有区分标准和方法（这个区分到00年代仿似就很广泛了），它或能在更深处搅乱大家的论证所隐含的“不能够推出不应当”。Hudson, Gibbard, Harsanyi尤其值得读，黑尔的回应清晰到页码行码，非常贴心。"It is a mistake to think that, because we could not have a word in our language without accepting some substantial principle, the principle itself holds analytically. "
评分在认识和实践等方面的追问，（可能由于篇幅限制）紧致得体（感觉还能够再压缩），问题质量啊很好，不过大部分好似没有区分标准和方法（这个区分到00年代仿似就很广泛了），它或能在更深处搅乱大家的论证所隐含的“不能够推出不应当”。Hudson, Gibbard, Harsanyi尤其值得读，黑尔的回应清晰到页码行码，非常贴心。"It is a mistake to think that, because we could not have a word in our language without accepting some substantial principle, the principle itself holds analytically. "
评分在认识和实践等方面的追问，（可能由于篇幅限制）紧致得体（感觉还能够再压缩），问题质量啊很好，不过大部分好似没有区分标准和方法（这个区分到00年代仿似就很广泛了），它或能在更深处搅乱大家的论证所隐含的“不能够推出不应当”。Hudson, Gibbard, Harsanyi尤其值得读，黑尔的回应清晰到页码行码，非常贴心。"It is a mistake to think that, because we could not have a word in our language without accepting some substantial principle, the principle itself holds analytically. "
评分在认识和实践等方面的追问，（可能由于篇幅限制）紧致得体（感觉还能够再压缩），问题质量啊很好，不过大部分好似没有区分标准和方法（这个区分到00年代仿似就很广泛了），它或能在更深处搅乱大家的论证所隐含的“不能够推出不应当”。Hudson, Gibbard, Harsanyi尤其值得读，黑尔的回应清晰到页码行码，非常贴心。"It is a mistake to think that, because we could not have a word in our language without accepting some substantial principle, the principle itself holds analytically. "
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有