Martin King Whyte is Professor of Sociology at Harvard University.
Is popular anger about rising inequality propelling China toward a "social volcano" of protest activity and instability that could challenge Chinese Communist Party rule? Many inside and outside of China have speculated, without evidence, that the answer is yes. In 2004, Harvard sociologist Martin King Whyte has undertaken the first systematic, nationwide survey of ordinary Chinese citizens to ask them directly how they feel about inequalities that have resulted since China's market opening in 1978. His findings are the subject of this book.
个人观点,比毛时代的进步是显而易见的。但是当前不平等我以为依然是严重的,毛时代纯粹以权力为划分,当前则以扭曲的以“公地侵占”为核心的社会“成功”规则为划分。 现有规则下的成功多是以对公共资源(环境,商品质量,价格等)的侵占而达成因而隐蔽性更强。(比如工资水...
評分个人观点,比毛时代的进步是显而易见的。但是当前不平等我以为依然是严重的,毛时代纯粹以权力为划分,当前则以扭曲的以“公地侵占”为核心的社会“成功”规则为划分。 现有规则下的成功多是以对公共资源(环境,商品质量,价格等)的侵占而达成因而隐蔽性更强。(比如工资水...
評分个人观点,比毛时代的进步是显而易见的。但是当前不平等我以为依然是严重的,毛时代纯粹以权力为划分,当前则以扭曲的以“公地侵占”为核心的社会“成功”规则为划分。 现有规则下的成功多是以对公共资源(环境,商品质量,价格等)的侵占而达成因而隐蔽性更强。(比如工资水...
評分个人观点,比毛时代的进步是显而易见的。但是当前不平等我以为依然是严重的,毛时代纯粹以权力为划分,当前则以扭曲的以“公地侵占”为核心的社会“成功”规则为划分。 现有规则下的成功多是以对公共资源(环境,商品质量,价格等)的侵占而达成因而隐蔽性更强。(比如工资水...
評分个人观点,比毛时代的进步是显而易见的。但是当前不平等我以为依然是严重的,毛时代纯粹以权力为划分,当前则以扭曲的以“公地侵占”为核心的社会“成功”规则为划分。 现有规则下的成功多是以对公共资源(环境,商品质量,价格等)的侵占而达成因而隐蔽性更强。(比如工资水...
The first systematic social science exploration into how Chinese perceive social fairness in the post-Mao era. Survey is an unavoidable choice, but what I like about the book is the way he interprets those results - pretty inspiring and is indeed a breakthrough.
评分好無聊的定量分析。結果和我周圍的感受不同啊。王豐對類型化不平等的討論,再加上這本書認為的大眾認可不平等的分配,結閤起來真是一個很怪異的結論
评分做keynoye的時候總能爆發驚人的能量
评分做keynoye的時候總能爆發驚人的能量
评分也還可以吧
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有