Seeing a cat rubbing against a person, Charles Darwin described her as i??in an affectionate frame of mindi??'; for Samuel Barnett, a behavioralist, the mental realm is beyond the grasp of scientists and behavior must be described technically, as a physical action only. What difference does this difference make? In Eileen Crist's analysis of the language used to portray animal behavior, the difference i??is that in the reader's mind the very image of the cat's 'body' is transfigured from an experiencing subject into a vacant objecti??'. i??Images of Animalsi?? examines the literature of behavioral science, revealing how works with the common aim of documenting animal lives, habits, and instincts describe i??realities that are world's aparti??'. Whether the writer affirms the Cartesian verdict of an unbridgeable chasm between animals and humans or the Darwinian panorama of evolutionary continuity, the question of animal mind is ever present and problematic in behavioral thought. Comparing the naturalist writings of Charles Darwin, Jean Henri Fabre, and George and Elizabeth Peckham to works of classical ethology by Konrad Lorenz and Nikolaas Tinbergen and of contemporary sociobiology, Crist demonstrates how words matter. She does not attempt to defend any of these constructions as a faithful representation of animal existence, but to show how each internally coherent view molds the reader's understanding of animals. Rejecting the notion that i??a neutral instrument in the depiction of animals and, in particular, it is never impartial with respect to the question of animal mindi??'. Author note: Eileen Crist is Assistant Professor at the Center for Interdisciplinary Studies at Virginia Polytechnic Institute.
評分
評分
評分
評分
福柯式係譜+廣義敘述學+語言現象學。關注語言在動物想象中發揮的作用以及悖論之處,描述瞭錶徵動物的話語營造和概念機器的學科曆史,藉用彼得溫施的兩種分類,劃齣達爾文通過普通語言搭建的anthropomorphism 和經典倫理學通過技術語言搭建的mechanomorphism,比較不同錶徵背後的認識論邏輯,得齣語言不是客觀中立的媒介,action與behavior不同。
评分福柯式係譜+廣義敘述學+語言現象學。關注語言在動物想象中發揮的作用以及悖論之處,描述瞭錶徵動物的話語營造和概念機器的學科曆史,藉用彼得溫施的兩種分類,劃齣達爾文通過普通語言搭建的anthropomorphism 和經典倫理學通過技術語言搭建的mechanomorphism,比較不同錶徵背後的認識論邏輯,得齣語言不是客觀中立的媒介,action與behavior不同。
评分福柯式係譜+廣義敘述學+語言現象學。關注語言在動物想象中發揮的作用以及悖論之處,描述瞭錶徵動物的話語營造和概念機器的學科曆史,藉用彼得溫施的兩種分類,劃齣達爾文通過普通語言搭建的anthropomorphism 和經典倫理學通過技術語言搭建的mechanomorphism,比較不同錶徵背後的認識論邏輯,得齣語言不是客觀中立的媒介,action與behavior不同。
评分福柯式係譜+廣義敘述學+語言現象學。關注語言在動物想象中發揮的作用以及悖論之處,描述瞭錶徵動物的話語營造和概念機器的學科曆史,藉用彼得溫施的兩種分類,劃齣達爾文通過普通語言搭建的anthropomorphism 和經典倫理學通過技術語言搭建的mechanomorphism,比較不同錶徵背後的認識論邏輯,得齣語言不是客觀中立的媒介,action與behavior不同。
评分福柯式係譜+廣義敘述學+語言現象學。關注語言在動物想象中發揮的作用以及悖論之處,描述瞭錶徵動物的話語營造和概念機器的學科曆史,藉用彼得溫施的兩種分類,劃齣達爾文通過普通語言搭建的anthropomorphism 和經典倫理學通過技術語言搭建的mechanomorphism,比較不同錶徵背後的認識論邏輯,得齣語言不是客觀中立的媒介,action與behavior不同。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有