Cities of Jiangnan in Late Imperial China pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Linda Cooke Johnson is Associate Professor in the Department of History at Michigan State University. She is the author of The Great Scheme for Commercial Intercourse: The Chinese, the British, and the Opening of Shanghai, and The Creation of a Pre-Colonial Port City: Shanghai 1730-1850.

出版者:State University of New York Press

作者:Linda Cooke Johnson (Editor)

出品人:

頁數:310

译者:

出版時間:1993-7-1

價格:USD 33.95

裝幀:Paperback

isbn號碼:9780791414248

叢書系列:

圖書標籤:

城市
曆史
城市史
海外中國研究
urban
studies
research
跳讀

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到小美書屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

This book examines cities of the Jiangnan region of south-central China between the twelfth and nineteenth centuries, an area considered to be the model of a successfully developing regional economy. The six studies focus on the urban centers of Suzhou, Hangzhou, Yangzhou, and Shanghai.

Emphasizing the regional focus, the authors explore the interconnections and sequential relationships between these major cities and analyze common themes such as the development of handicraft industry, transport and commerce, class structure, ethnic diversity and internal immigration, and the social and political pressures generated by developments in manufacturing, taxes, and government politics. The book provides a valuable resource on commercial development and internal economic and social development in pre-modern China, particularly on specific regional development and the historical role of traditional Chinese cities.

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

没有学者能准确的判断出，中国的城市史研究到底和西方学者的差距有多大。施坚雅（G.William Skinner）的《中华帝国晚期的城市》（The City in Late Imperial China）出版二十年之后，中国学者才看到这部书。而这部书，被中国学界广泛认为，对中国城市史研究起了巨...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

中国城市的成因，学者给与了不同的解释。给予不同的政治原因，城市形成和发展也不一样。本书所记载的五个城市各有特色。用霍恩伯格的说法，欧洲中世纪属于网格城市。其实帝国晚期的中国江南城市也属于网格城市的发展脉络。从本书来看，五所城市的成因各有不同，虽然苏州和杭州...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

这本书是和其英文版对照着读的。译者显然下过功夫，在footnote里考证引文出处这一点就很难得。可惜译者对某些中国研究专家的英文名不熟，比如Ray Huang，Phillip Huang，至于把John K. Fairbank[费正清]翻译成约翰•费尔班克斯就有些过分。不过总体而言还是不错，至少没有出...

評分☆☆☆☆☆