Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free. This is an OCR edition with typos. Excerpt from book: changes; and even if the cause of the variation is of a psychological nature, we can hardly call it an effort, unless we give a very unusual extension to the meaning of the word. The truth is, it is necessary to dig beneath the effort Innk for a dpppfr cruise. This is especially necessary, we believe, if we wish to get at a cause of regular hereditary variations. We are not going to enter here into the controversies over the transmissibility of acquired characters; still less do we wish to take too definite a side on this question, which is not within our province. But we cannot remain completely indifferent to it. Nowhere is it clearer that philosophers can not to-day content themselves with vague generalities, but must follow the scientists in experimental detail and discuss the results with them. If Spencer had begun by putting to himself the question of the heredita- bility of acquired characters, his evolutionism would no doubt have taken an altogether different form. If (as seems probable to us) a habit contracted by the individual were transmitted to its descendants only in very exceptional cases, all the Spencerian psychology would need re-making, and a large part of Spencer's philosophy would fall to pieces. Let us say, then, how the problem seems to us to present itself, and in what direction an attempt might be made to solve it. After having been affirmed as a dogma, the transmissibility of acquired characters has been no less dogmatically denied, for reasons drawn o priori from the supposed nature of germinal cells. It is well known how Weismann was led, by his hypothesis of the continuity of the germ-plasm, to regard the germinal cells ? ova and spermatozoa ? as almost independent of the somatic cells. Starting from this, it has been claimed, and is still claime...
用生物学知识企图探索人类思维的发展源流,植物进化趋向静止,动物进化趋向运动。前者是本能的道路,后者是智能的道路。人类为了发展智能,而牺牲了本能,和物质结合,走向了创造和改造世界的道路。虽然作者序言称物理化学研究的是原子等死去之物,而人文学科才关注的是活着的...
评分看《时间之箭》,里面好像说过这样的观点,时间的单向流动性,是因为我们的大脑的工作方式所产生的感受——我们的大脑的思考与记忆的机制,也正好像算盘一样,通过算珠从有序到无序演化,来储存记忆运行思考,我们思考的方向,赋予一切外在事物的演化方向:从有序到无序,所以...
评分柏格森哲学的难懂在于他的暧昧不清,当初罗素和萨特不待见他的原因也是这样,因为无论在文体上还是在选词上都实在太暧昧了,一个词的使用范畴很容易滑进另一个领域,且他的哲学属于旧形而上学和新形而上学青黄不接那段,不好拿捏啊。 反对柏格森就是认同柏格森,谁叫他的创...
评分如果你是一位《星际迷航》迷,在连续追看了它现有的11部系列电影之后,一定会对剧中关键性人物Spock有非常深刻的印象。作为人类和瓦岗人的混血后裔,Spock一直在思考这样一个问题:选择做瓦岗人还是人类,选择理智还是感性?这个问题在《星际迷航6》中,给出了确切答案:Logic ...
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有