What fundamental account of the world is implicit in physical theory? Physics straightforwardly postulates quarks and electrons, but what of the more intangible elements, such as laws of nature, universals, causation and the direction of time? Do they have a place in the physical structure of the world? Tim Maudlin argues that the ontology derived from physics takes a form quite different from those most commonly defended by philosophers. Physics postulates irreducible fundamental laws, eschews universals, does not require a fundamental notion of causation, and makes room for the passage of time. In a series of linked essays The Metaphysics Within Physics outlines an approach to metaphysics opposed to the Humean reductionism that motivates much analytical metaphysics.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
論證方式和寫作風格都值得學習~~大白話寫得好的人不多...
评分論證方式和寫作風格都值得學習~~大白話寫得好的人不多...
评分"[T]he proper object of most metaphysics is the careful analysis of our best scientific theories (and especially of fundamental physical theories) with the goal of determining what they imply about the constitution of the physical world."
评分"[T]he proper object of most metaphysics is the careful analysis of our best scientific theories (and especially of fundamental physical theories) with the goal of determining what they imply about the constitution of the physical world."
评分三觀裏麵的（物理）世界觀沒問題，雖然我覺得除瞭老實學習接受現當代物理學之外，形而上學沒啥特彆的東西好說，因而沒有特彆的存在的價值，但是作為一種在人文學科內倡導物理世界觀的讀物來看的話，本書還是可以讀讀的。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有