A former professor of European History at Princeton University, Robert Darnton is Carl H. Pforzheimer University Professor and director of the Harvard University Library. The founder of the Gutenberg-e program, he is the author of many books. He lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
The invention of writing was one of the most important technological, cultural, and sociological breakthroughs in human history. With the printed book, information and ideas could disseminate more widely and effectively than ever before—and in some cases, affect and redirect the sway of history. Today, nearly one million books are published each year. But is the era of the book as we know it—a codex of bound pages—coming to an end? And if it is, should we celebrate its demise and the creation of a democratic digital future, or mourn an irreplaceable loss? The digital age is revolutionizing the information landscape. Already, more books have been scanned and digitized than were housed in the great library in Alexandria, making available millions of texts for a curious reader at the click of a button, and electronic book sales are growing exponentially. Will this revolution in the delivery of information and entertainment make for more transparent and far-reaching dissemination or create a monopolistic stranglehold?
In The Case for Books, Robert Darnton, an intellectual pioneer in the field of the history of the book and director of Harvard University's Library, offers an in-depth examination of the book from its earliest beginnings to its shifting role today in popular culture, commerce, and the academy. As an author, editorial advisor, and publishing entrepreneur, Darnton is a unique authority on the life and role of the book in society. This book is a wise work of scholarship—one that requires readers to carefully consider how the digital revolution will broadly affect the marketplace of ideas.
一种媒介不会取代另一种媒介,就像我在的博客hjbrave.blog.163.com发表的文章《信息竞争论》一样。信息在互相竞争,有很多传统的信息虽然没有被取代,但是人们已经不在上面花费时间,投入精力了。现在的信息就像古代皇帝的后宫,妃嫔无数各个等着被主人宠幸。没有竞争力的虽然...
評分我觉得《阅读的未来》这本书正确的名字应该叫《阅读的过去》比较好。因为在哈佛图书馆的前馆长之中,达恩顿正是经历了谷歌图书搜索计划的那一任。这个计划,始于将五所大学研究性图书馆的馆藏书籍数字化,哈佛正是五所大学之一。一辈子热爱古籍珍本的达恩顿对此计划是持负...
評分听过这样一句话:人们喜欢回忆过去的美好,只是在缅怀过去自己的年轻力壮,青春美好。在技术大潮来临之际,Google试图把所有书籍都搬上网络时,“缅怀过去”的罗伯特·达恩顿(Robert darnton)在《阅读的未来》一书中描述了这样一种体验: “不过,对旧式图书的偏爱也许模糊...
評分相信阅读有美好的未来《阅读的未来》 在刚刚出炉的2011各种好书排行榜中,看到了这本书,虽然不是太起眼,但是因为关注读书,关心阅读,所以还是先买来看看。其实关于阅读的书有很多很多,但是多数对你真正的阅读都没有什么帮助。不过要是不看也会感觉到一点遗憾。 作...
評分一种媒介不会取代另一种媒介,就像我在的博客hjbrave.blog.163.com发表的文章《信息竞争论》一样。信息在互相竞争,有很多传统的信息虽然没有被取代,但是人们已经不在上面花费时间,投入精力了。现在的信息就像古代皇帝的后宫,妃嫔无数各个等着被主人宠幸。没有竞争力的虽然...
書名和章節標題都很好,但是嚴重文不對題。我覺得作者根本沒有討論閱讀未來的意願,隻是掛著幌子懷舊罷瞭。
评分書名和章節標題都很好,但是嚴重文不對題。我覺得作者根本沒有討論閱讀未來的意願,隻是掛著幌子懷舊罷瞭。
评分書名和章節標題都很好,但是嚴重文不對題。我覺得作者根本沒有討論閱讀未來的意願,隻是掛著幌子懷舊罷瞭。
评分書名和章節標題都很好,但是嚴重文不對題。我覺得作者根本沒有討論閱讀未來的意願,隻是掛著幌子懷舊罷瞭。
评分書名和章節標題都很好,但是嚴重文不對題。我覺得作者根本沒有討論閱讀未來的意願,隻是掛著幌子懷舊罷瞭。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有