The Great Tradition pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
F.R. Leavis was born in 1895 in Cambridge, where he would live and teach for most of the rest of his life. He volunteered as a stretcher-bearer in the First World War, and was badly gassed on the Western Front. Appointed Director of Studies in English at Downing College, Cambridge, in 1930, he remained there for the next thirty years, often at odds with the University establishment. In 1932 he and his wife Queenie Roth founded the hugely influential journal Scrutiny, which ran until 1953. He was one of the most important figures in the development of modern literary criticism, and in the elevation of English as a serious academic subject. He died in 1978.
- 文學理論
- 新批評
- 文本批評
- F.R.Leavis
- 神作
- 文藝理論
- 文學
- 文化研究
'The great English novelists are Jane Austen, George Eliot, Henry James and Joseph Conrad...' So begins what is arguably F.R. Leavis' most controversial book, "The Great Tradition", an uncompromising critical and polemical survey of English fiction that was first published in 1948. He puts a powerful case for moral seriousness as the necessary criterion for inclusion in any list of the finest novelists. In the course of his argument he adds D.H. Lawrence to the pantheon, and singles out Charles Dickens' "Hard Times" as the one work of his that has the strength of 'a completely serious work of art'."The Great Tradition" is full of Leavis' characteristically austere rejections of styles of fiction that he found lacking in moral intensity. He dismissed Lawrence Sterne for his 'irresponsible (and nasty) trifling'. Of Henry Fielding he wrote that he is important 'not because he leads to Mr J.B. Priestley but because he leads to Jane Austen, to appreciate whose distinction is to feel that life isn't long enough to permit of one's giving much time to Fielding or any to Mr Priestley.' Joyce's "Ulysses", he said, was less a new start for fiction than 'a dead end'. Fiercely serious, pugnacious and stimulating, "The Great Tradition" is an unforgettable defence of 'those creative geniuses whose distinction is manifested in their being peculiarly alive in their time'.
具體描述
讀後感
通常，艺术的标准在于美。但是美是什么？人们众说纷纭，莫衷一是。当苏格拉底以实用为美，当柏拉图以简洁为美，毕达哥拉斯学派提出的比例和对称，普罗提诺提出的光亮，阿奎纳不涉及利益的合目的性，歌德提出的完善，阿恩海姆的平衡和对称，等等，都是在尝试寻找一种属性，这种...
評分通常，艺术的标准在于美。但是美是什么？人们众说纷纭，莫衷一是。当苏格拉底以实用为美，当柏拉图以简洁为美，毕达哥拉斯学派提出的比例和对称，普罗提诺提出的光亮，阿奎纳不涉及利益的合目的性，歌德提出的完善，阿恩海姆的平衡和对称，等等，都是在尝试寻找一种属性，这种...
評分通常，艺术的标准在于美。但是美是什么？人们众说纷纭，莫衷一是。当苏格拉底以实用为美，当柏拉图以简洁为美，毕达哥拉斯学派提出的比例和对称，普罗提诺提出的光亮，阿奎纳不涉及利益的合目的性，歌德提出的完善，阿恩海姆的平衡和对称，等等，都是在尝试寻找一种属性，这种...
評分通常，艺术的标准在于美。但是美是什么？人们众说纷纭，莫衷一是。当苏格拉底以实用为美，当柏拉图以简洁为美，毕达哥拉斯学派提出的比例和对称，普罗提诺提出的光亮，阿奎纳不涉及利益的合目的性，歌德提出的完善，阿恩海姆的平衡和对称，等等，都是在尝试寻找一种属性，这种...
評分通常，艺术的标准在于美。但是美是什么？人们众说纷纭，莫衷一是。当苏格拉底以实用为美，当柏拉图以简洁为美，毕达哥拉斯学派提出的比例和对称，普罗提诺提出的光亮，阿奎纳不涉及利益的合目的性，歌德提出的完善，阿恩海姆的平衡和对称，等等，都是在尝试寻找一种属性，这种...
用戶評價
心目中最棒的文學批評傢之一。剩下狄更斯Hard Times那章還沒看。
评分The major novelists who count in the same way as the major poets, in the sense that they not only change the possibilities of the art for practitioners and readers, but that they are significant in terms of the human awareness they promote; awareness of the possibilities of life.
评分The major novelists who count in the same way as the major poets, in the sense that they not only change the possibilities of the art for practitioners and readers, but that they are significant in terms of the human awareness they promote; awareness of the possibilities of life.
评分心目中最棒的文學批評傢之一。剩下狄更斯Hard Times那章還沒看。
评分The major novelists who count in the same way as the major poets, in the sense that they not only change the possibilities of the art for practitioners and readers, but that they are significant in terms of the human awareness they promote; awareness of the possibilities of life.
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有