The Archaeology of the Soul is a testimony to the extraordinary scope of Seth Benardete’s thought. Some essays concern particular authors or texts; others range more broadly and are thematic. Some deal explicitly with philosophy; others deal with epic, lyric, and tragic poetry. Some of these authors are Greek, some Roman, and still others are contemporaries writing about antiquity. All of these essays, however, are informed by an underlying vision, which is a reflection of Benardete’s life-long engagement with one thinker in particular – Plato. The Platonic dialogue presented Benardete with the most vivid case of that periagoge, or turn-around, that he found to be the sign of all philosophic thinking and that is the signature as well of his own interpretations not only of Plato but also of other thinkers.
The core of The Archaeology of the Soul consists of a set of essays Benardete produced in his last years; the collection provides at the same time an entry into that world through some of Benardete’s earliest articles on Plato and on Greek poetry. Benardete’s earlier path of close textual analysis always reflected his intimate philosophic dialogue with the thinker in whose work he was immersed; later, he drew on resources of erudition acquired over a lifetime to present a broader picture, on a theme like the dialectics of eros or freedom and necessity.
In his late work Benardete was not only engaged in putting together in more general form material he had worked out earlier; he was still on the trail of new discoveries, above all, by extending his Platonic understanding of philosophy to pre- and post-Platonic thinkers. He had become increasingly aware that the discovery of philosophy through the “Socratic turn” was really the rediscovery of an understanding already present in some form in the Greek poets and that awareness guided his last years of study of the pre-Socratic philosophers. According to the standard view of the history of Greek philosophy, the Socratic turn, with its focus on “the human things,” marks a point of radical change in philosophy’s history. Benardete’s late studies led him to the conclusion that the kind of pivotal reorientation thought to be Socratic is in fact the mark of what it means to think philosophically, and Heraclitus or Parmenides is a genuine philosophic thinker precisely to the extent that a Socratic turn can be found in some form within his own thought.
At the same time that he was pursuing a track backward, from Plato to the poets and pre-Socratic philosophers, Benardete was also proceeding on a forward path, from Plato to the Latin writers, who adopt the Platonic way of thinking with full understanding of what it means to be “post-Platonic.” As the essays collected in this volume demonstrate, the Platonic notion of a “second sailing” gave Benardete a key to the relation between Greek and Latin thought – and with that to a comprehensive understanding of antiquity – as it did to the relation between poetry and philosophy as such.
The Late Seth Benardete was an outstanding teacher and scholar in classical literature and philosophy, who taught at New York University. He is the author of numerous works in the classics and philosophy, among them Achilles and Hector: The Homeric Hero, Sacred Transgressions: A Reading of Sophocles' Antigone, Herodotean Inquiries, and as co-translator with Michael Davis for Aristotle – On Poetics.
Ronna Burger teaches philosophy at Tulane University; she is the author of The Phaedo: A Platonic Labyrinth from St. Augustine’s Press and Aristotle’s Dialogue with Socrates: On the Nicomachean Ethics (University of Chicago Press).
Michael Davis teaches philosophy at Sarah Lawrence College; he authored Wonderlust: Ruminations on Liberal Education, The Poetry of Philosophy: On Aristotle’s Poetics and, with Seth Benardete, translated Aristotle – On Poetics, both from St. Augustine’s Press. Burger and Davis collaborated on editing Seth Benardete’s Achilles and Hector: The Homeric Hero (St. Augustine’s Press).
评分
评分
评分
评分
老实说,我是一个对“结构”要求极高的人,很多叙事复杂的作品最终都会因为逻辑上的小瑕疵而功亏一篑。但这部作品的架构之精妙,简直令人拍案叫绝。它采用了多重时间线和叙事视角的交织推进方式,非但没有造成混乱,反而如同复杂的音乐复调,所有旋律最终汇集成一个和谐而有力的主旋律。每一次看似不经意的伏笔,都在后续的章节中得到了精巧的回扣和升华。这种对整体结构的掌控力,体现出作者极高的自律性和周密的布局。它不像某些作品那样在结尾处草草收场,而是以一种水到渠成的、却又令人回味无穷的方式落幕,留给读者无尽的想象空间。
评分这本书的视觉冲击力是如此强烈,以至于我时常需要放下书本,仅仅是望着窗外发呆,试图整理思绪。它对环境和氛围的描绘达到了近乎催眠的程度,你仿佛能闻到那些古老房间里尘土的气味,感受到深夜中那种令人窒息的寂静。作者对光影和色彩的运用,简直可以媲美顶级的电影导演。每一次场景切换,都像是更换了一幅精心绘制的油画。这种极强的画面感,极大地增强了故事的代入感。特别是那些描写内心世界的段落,虽然是抽象的情感,但在作者的笔下,它们也仿佛拥有了实体和纹理,可以被触摸,被感知。这不仅仅是阅读,更像是一次全方位的感官盛宴。
评分从文学技巧的角度来看,这本书无疑是值得称赞的。它的大部分篇幅都建立在一种极为古典和严谨的散文结构之上,然而作者却巧妙地融入了现代主义的碎片化叙事手法,使得整体的阅读体验既有历史的厚重感,又不失现代的锋利。语言的运用达到了炉火纯青的地步,那些长句的铺陈,那些精准到令人拍案叫绝的比喻,都展现了作者深厚的文字功底。我注意到,作者似乎非常钟爱使用反讽和隐喻来揭示更深层次的社会现象,这使得文本的解读空间被极大地拓宽了。它要求读者保持高度的注意力,去解码那些藏在字里行间的深意,而不是被动地接受信息。这种挑战性,恰恰是吸引我一页接一页读下去的动力。
评分我必须承认,初读这本书时,我曾因为其概念的宏大和复杂性而感到一丝压力。它涉及的哲学思辨领域非常广阔,涉及的知识储备量令人咋舌。然而,正是这种“野心勃勃”的创作态度,最终成就了它的非凡之处。作者并没有将复杂的理论生硬地灌输给我们,而是通过一个引人入胜的故事线作为载体,将那些高深的思考自然地融入其中。这种“润物细无声”的教育方式,让我感到既被启发,又没有被说教。它促使我停下来,去思考那些我过去从未深究过的问题,关于时间、记忆、存在的意义等等。看完最后一页,那种被智力充分激发的满足感,是许多同类书籍无法比拟的。
评分这部作品的叙事节奏把握得极佳,如同一次精心策划的探险,引人入胜却又不失深邃。作者在构建世界观时,展现出了惊人的想象力和对细节的执着。我尤其欣赏它对于角色内心挣扎的描摹,那些微妙的情绪波动,那些不为人知的秘密,都被细腻地剥开,呈现在读者面前。读到某些转折点时,我甚至能感受到作者笔下人物命运的重量,仿佛自己也一同经历了他们所有的迷茫与抉择。整本书读下来,我感觉自己完成了一次精神上的漫游,那些描绘的场景,那些关于人性本质的探讨,都深深地烙印在了我的脑海中。它不是那种快餐式的娱乐读物,更像是一坛需要时间慢慢品味的陈酿,每一次重读都会有新的体悟。那种沉浸式的阅读体验,是近些年少有的佳作所能给予的。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有