This exciting new text presents the first overview of Jean Jacques Rousseau's work from a political science perspective. Was Rousseau--the great theorist of the French Revolution--really a conservative? This original study argues that the he was a constitutionalist much closer to Madison, Montesquieu, and Locke than to revolutionaries. Outlining his profound opposition to Godless materialism and revolutionary change, this book finds parallels between Rousseau and Burke, as well as showing how Rousseau developed the first modern theory of nationalism. The book presents an integrated political analysis of Rousseau's educational, ethical, religious and political writings, and will be essential reading for students of politics, philosophy and the history of ideas.
評分
評分
評分
評分
處理的路徑算是比較有啓發性,但是談得太散瞭,論證力度也有限。
评分盧梭啥都好,不好的地方要麼是彆人misunderstand,要麼是"Rousseau was aware that his writings could be misinterpreted - there is a high price to be paid for eloquence."...啥都好啊啥都好
评分處理的路徑算是比較有啓發性,但是談得太散瞭,論證力度也有限。
评分盧梭啥都好,不好的地方要麼是彆人misunderstand,要麼是"Rousseau was aware that his writings could be misinterpreted - there is a high price to be paid for eloquence."...啥都好啊啥都好
评分盧梭啥都好,不好的地方要麼是彆人misunderstand,要麼是"Rousseau was aware that his writings could be misinterpreted - there is a high price to be paid for eloquence."...啥都好啊啥都好
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有