Harry G. Frankfurt is a professor of philosophy emeritus at Princeton University. His books include The Reasons of Love; Necessity, Volition, and Love; and The Importance of What We Care About. He lives in Princeton, New Jersey.
One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share. But we tend to take the situation for granted. Most people are rather confident of their ability to recognize bullshit and to avoid being taken in by it. So the phenomenon has not aroused much deliberate concern. We have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, why there is so much of it, or what functions it serves. And we lack a conscientiously developed appreciation of what it means to us. In other words, as Harry Frankfurt writes, "we have no theory."
Frankfurt, one of the world's most influential moral philosophers, attempts to build such a theory here. With his characteristic combination of philosophical acuity, psychological insight, and wry humor, Frankfurt proceeds by exploring how bullshit and the related concept of humbug are distinct from lying. He argues that bullshitters misrepresent themselves to their audience not as liars do, that is, by deliberately making false claims about what is true. In fact, bullshit need not be untrue at all.
Rather, bullshitters seek to convey a certain impression of themselves without being concerned about whether anything at all is true. They quietly change the rules governing their end of the conversation so that claims about truth and falsity are irrelevant. Frankfurt concludes that although bullshit can take many innocent forms, excessive indulgence in it can eventually undermine the practitioner's capacity to tell the truth in a way that lying does not. Liars at least acknowledge that it matters what is true. By virtue of this, Frankfurt writes, bullshit is a greater enemy of the truth than lies are.
人为什么要扯淡?当形势需要人们去讲他自己也不知所云的话时,当一个人有责任或机会,针对某个话题去发表超过了他对这个话题了解时,扯淡就开始了。 读《论扯淡》到这里,不禁拍案称奇:这说的不就是公司面试么?或者反过来说,面试不就(大多)是扯淡么?或者中肯地说,面试...
评分前陣子看了《論扯淡》,原著名為《On Bullshit》 裏面把扯淡這一動作幾乎批判到一無是處 基本的論調為: 撒謊者知道事實的真相是什麽,旨在試圖掩蓋真相 扯淡者根本不在乎事實是什麽,就在那邊高談闊論 所以在真理面前,比起撒謊,扯淡才是...
评分李敖在《中国性研究》里面讲过这样一个有趣的笑话: 兄弟二人,赴京赶考,兄中状元,弟弟落第。弟弟先返乡,弟媳不乐。入夜,弟弟语其妻曰:“别以为考上状元有什么好,考上后,那话儿就没有了!”弟媳信以为真,破涕为笑,反倒庆幸自己丈夫落第。第二天,偷偷告诉嫂嫂,说哥...
评分花了大约两个小时看完《论扯谈》。结论是:文章不错,书就算了吧! 这个时代缺少废话少的作者,能够如本书作者这样以简洁明了风格的人进行学术研究的人实在太少了。作者的结论也如此简洁明了: ”扯谈不是说谎,却是真理最大的敌人。因为说谎的人知道何者为真,却讲的是假话...
评分任何人,也不能阻止我去吃屎,我吃我的屎,这是我的个人权利。谁说屎不可以吃,你们曾吃过吗?休想把你们的观念强加于我,我是自由的,我想吃就可以去吃,不受任何人的干涉。谢谢。你不吃屎,你是不对的。草木吃了屎,茁壮生长,猪牛吃了草,才能变成猪肉和牛肉,给你做红烧肉...
i.e. When Soviet rocket scientists looked at the American design it must have been extremely hard not to laugh and roll around.
评分hahahahha,全书就是最鲜活的一个例子说明什么叫bullshit!!! 不过真是太黑色了,这书居然是畅销书!!!我还以为只有苦逼paper党才会care。
评分文辞练达优美。好喜欢这种论文长度和风格的口袋小书啊。
评分关于胡说八道的哲学分析。 如果更年轻的时候读这个,可能会觉得这本书本身就是在扯淡,但是现在读,的确是感受到了其中进行的哲学分析。还蛮有意思的一本小书
评分hahahahha,全书就是最鲜活的一个例子说明什么叫bullshit!!! 不过真是太黑色了,这书居然是畅销书!!!我还以为只有苦逼paper党才会care。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有