From Publishers Weekly Timed to coincide with the Reagan-Gorbachev summit meeting in November, here are the Henry L. Stimson Lectures delivered at Yale by the former chancellor of West Germany. Schmidt's subtitle sums up his view that the West desperately needs to repair its present disarray, which finds Europe politically leaderless and dominated by the "high-handed unilateral decisionmaking" of the U.S. He is frank about the perils posed by the "second Cold War" in which the superpowers seem engaged, and argues for a Western buildup of conventional forces with simultaneous negotiations for real nuclear-arms reductions with the U.S.S.R. Schmidt is statesmanlike and balanced in his proposals for a grand strategy, discussing economic and ecological issues as well as military-political perils. He views the U.S. budget deficit as a "time bomb," and Reagan's Star Wars plan as stemming from an obsession with a "worst case" scenario, to which Schmidt responds with his own 19-point "best case" proposal. November 20Copyright 1985 Reed Business Information, Inc. From Library Journal There are two very good reasons for reading this book. The first is the author, the second the ideas. Schmidt, Chancellor of West Germany from 1972 until 1984, is considered to be the most outstanding German leader since Adenauer. His central thesis here is that purely national strategies are incapable of achieving political, economic, or security goals given the interlocking and interdependent nature of the Western world. He examines the policies of the United States and Europe with respect to the USSR, the global economy, the Middle East, the Far East, and Central America. He finds fragmentation, inconsistency, and a lack of leadership and cohesion. He suggests that the political, economic, and security areas of policy are not separable and that harmonization of policy in each area is necessary to achieve the goals in all areas. Schmidt's insights into the politics of the Western alliance demand attention. Highly recommended. Richard B. Finnegan, Political Science Dept., Stonehill Coll., North Easton, Mass.Copyright 1985 Reed Business Information, Inc.
评分
评分
评分
评分
如果说大多数国际关系著作都在试图描绘“我们是谁”和“我们应该做什么”,那么这本书的价值在于,它更侧重于冷静地描绘“世界如何运转”的残酷现实。作者的笔调带着一种克制的悲观主义,没有廉价的乐观呼吁,也没有无用的道德谴责。他将焦点精准地对准了权力、利益和生存空间这三个永恒的主题。我发现自己一边阅读,一边在脑海中不断地与过去几十年里我所接受的国际政治教育进行对照和修正。特别是对联盟体系韧性的分析部分,那种对盟友间信任的腐蚀过程的细腻描摹,简直像是一部政治心理学的教科书。它不是提供简单的答案,而是提供了一套分析世界的工具箱,让你在面对下一次突发危机时,能够运用更精准的刻度去测量局势的真实重量。
评分这本书的行文风格,简直就是一场对逻辑严谨性的终极考验。每一个论点都像一块块打磨得光滑的基石,层层叠叠,直至构建起一个无懈可击的理论大厦。我尤其欣赏作者在处理复杂数据和历史案例时的那种旁征博引,但绝非堆砌,而是服务于核心论点的有力佐证。例如,关于全球化红利分配不均的论述,作者并未满足于泛泛而谈,而是深入到具体的贸易协定条款和国内产业结构调整的细枝末节中去挖掘其背后的政治动机。读到那些关于资源竞争和技术主导权的章节时,我常常需要停下来,反复咀嚼那些句子,生怕漏掉了其中微妙的含义转换。它不是那种能让你一口气读完的“爽文”,而更像是与一位极其博学、思维极其敏捷的导师进行长达数百页的辩论,需要你全程保持高度专注,并随时准备好挑战自己的既有认知。
评分从读者的角度来看,这本书最令人振奋的特质在于其坚定的、向前看的倾向。它不沉溺于对“黄金时代”的怀旧,也不被过去的失败所困扰,而是将所有的历史回溯都视为通往未来战略选择的铺垫。它强迫读者从一个宏观的、长期的战略视角来审视眼前的每一步棋。我尤其关注其中关于技术迭代如何重塑国家能力的部分,作者的预测性分析令人不寒而栗,它不再把科技进步视为一个中立的力量,而是将其彻底纳入了权力博弈的核心范畴。读完此书,我感受到一种被“赋能”的清醒,不再满足于被动接受新闻报道所呈现的世界碎片,而是有了一副可以去解码未来复杂局面的眼镜。这是一部真正具有“战略高度”的作品,其洞见足以指导未来十年的思考方向。
评分这部厚重的著作,初翻时便让人感受到一种扑面而来的历史厚度和对当代世界脉络的深刻洞察力。作者似乎拥有一种近乎全知全能的视角,将数个世纪的权力演变、经济波动与文化冲突编织成一张宏大而精密的网。读下去,你会发现它并非那种流于表面的时事评论集,而是深入到了地缘政治哲学的核心。它毫不留情地剖析了当前国际体系内在的结构性矛盾,那些看似偶然的事件,在作者的笔下都成了历史必然性的微小注脚。尤其令人印象深刻的是,它对“霸权”概念的重新界定,跳出了冷战思维的窠臼,用一种更具动态性和多维度的方式来审视力量的衰退与重组。那种冷静、抽离,仿佛在高空俯瞰棋局的叙事口吻,让人在阅读过程中既感到震撼,又生出一种历史的苍凉感。它迫使你重新审视那些被日常新闻噪音所掩盖的深层趋势,是对任何严肃思考国际关系的人士,一份不可或缺的、发人深省的指南。
评分这本书的语言运用达到了一个令人惊叹的平衡点:既有学术著作的深度和精确性,又兼具一流散文的流畅感和感染力。它避免了学究气的冗长,也摆脱了通俗读物的轻浮。作者对历史典故的运用,尤其精准,常常是一句古老的箴言,就能瞬间点亮一个当代的外交困境。我注意到,作者在探讨价值观与现实政治的冲突时,采用了对比强烈的排比句式,使得论点的张力被极大地放大了。这种文学性和思想深度的结合,使得阅读体验非常独特——你仿佛在聆听一位拥有丰富阅历的智者,用一种近乎诗意的语言,讲述着人类权力斗争永不休止的史诗。它真正做到了让复杂的理论变得可感、可触。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有