圖書標籤: 政治學 比較政治 Accountability 民主轉型 政治經濟學 政治理論 議會研究 英文原版
发表于2024-12-23
Democracy, Accountability, and Representation pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024
This book examines whether the mechanisms of accountability characteristic of democratic systems are sufficient to induce the representatives to act in the best interest of the represented. The first part of the volume focuses on the role of elections, distinguishing different ways in which they may cause representation. The second part is devoted to the role of checks and balances, between the government and the parliament as well as between the government and the bureaucracy. The contributors of this volume, all leading scholars in the fields of American and comparative politics and political theory, address questions such as, whether elections induce governments to act in the interest of citizens. Are politicians in democracies accountable to voters in future elections? If so, does accountability induce politicians to represent citizens? Does accountability limit or enhance the scope of action of governments? Are governments that violate campaign mandates representative? Overall, the essays combine theoretical discussions, game-theoretic models, case studies, and statistical analyses, within a shared analytical approach and a standardized terminology. The empirical material is drawn from the well established democracies as well as from new democracies.
Political Accountability扛鼎之作~
評分有些章節不是很理解。當然,accountability,責任說明這個概念現在已經的確高度定式化瞭,有瞭較為完整的貝葉斯博弈模型來理解民主製度下的責任說明何以可能。不過,在形式化之前,若乾基本的前提的確是需要討論的,政治傢追求權力,且無論在選舉還是在選舉之外,都試圖竭力試圖做到這一點。拋去非選齣部的行政部門不談,政治傢的確有相當多的手段,除去書中所論及的那些可能的方式來讓自己掌權的。傳統的方法:操縱選區劃分,改變選舉製度之外。例如在日本,很多其他的製度性安排:公職選舉法對新人進入政治市場的限製,國會製度所給予的在野黨有限的影響力,對在野黨的負麵攻擊,對在野黨分而治之的策略都大幅降低瞭自民黨責任說明的可能性。相較Takahashi教授他們所做的日本責任說明增強的報告,真是覺得不怎麼有信服感。
評分Political Accountability扛鼎之作~
評分Political Accountability扛鼎之作~
評分有些章節不是很理解。當然,accountability,責任說明這個概念現在已經的確高度定式化瞭,有瞭較為完整的貝葉斯博弈模型來理解民主製度下的責任說明何以可能。不過,在形式化之前,若乾基本的前提的確是需要討論的,政治傢追求權力,且無論在選舉還是在選舉之外,都試圖竭力試圖做到這一點。拋去非選齣部的行政部門不談,政治傢的確有相當多的手段,除去書中所論及的那些可能的方式來讓自己掌權的。傳統的方法:操縱選區劃分,改變選舉製度之外。例如在日本,很多其他的製度性安排:公職選舉法對新人進入政治市場的限製,國會製度所給予的在野黨有限的影響力,對在野黨的負麵攻擊,對在野黨分而治之的策略都大幅降低瞭自民黨責任說明的可能性。相較Takahashi教授他們所做的日本責任說明增強的報告,真是覺得不怎麼有信服感。
評分
評分
評分
評分
Democracy, Accountability, and Representation pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024