查爾斯·埃利斯,他在自己創立的Greenwich Associate國際谘詢事務所中擔任瞭30年的董事閤夥人並且為世界上幾乎所有的一流金融服務機構提供過谘詢服務。他曾是耶魯大學投資委員會主席和受托人、羅伯特伍德約翰遜基金會受托人、領航投資的董事、懷特黑德生物化學研究院的主席,並為亞洲、歐洲和北美的主要機構提供投資谘詢服務。他著有14本著作,包括:在《失敗者遊戲中取勝》和《喬威爾遜傳記》。
The jury is still out on what the future of Goldman Sachs will look like, but no one can argue that the 139 year old firm has been (and, if Warren Buffett has his way, will be) the dominant investment banker and dealer on Wall Street. What does Buffett see that we on the outside do not? Its all about the people.
Charles D. Ellis has written a landmark book that couldnt come at a better time. The Partnership: The Making of Goldman Sachs is the colorful and fascinating story of Goldmans rise to power through many life-threatening changes in markets, competition, and regulation. It tells the personal history of the men and women who built the worlds leading financial powerhouse from a firm that was disgraced and nearly destroyed in 1929, limped along as a break-even operation through the Depression and WWII, and, with only one special service and one improbable banker, began the rise that, in half a century, took Goldman Sachs to global leadership.
A conversation with Charles Ellis:
* Is Goldman Sachs really a lot better than other firms at managing risk?
The big difference is in the cumulative power of many small details. The difference in the speed, accuracy, and extent of communication inside the firm; the difference in intensity, focus, and disciplined toughness of the men and women hand selected to work there and real difference in recruiting, training, and compensation. All add up to a decisive advantage in management. Leaders and co-leaders manage Goldmans many business units with rigor and drive; risk management is the envy of other banks; and coordination is powerful across business units and markets around the world.
As every Olympic athlete knows, such small differences make all the difference between gold, silver or bronze or no medal at all. In the current, very difficult test, Goldman Sachs has come in 1st again.
* Goldman Sachs is often described as the best managed Wall Street firm. Is that true?
Yes, it is true. Goldman Sachs is the best managed Wall Street firm and the best led. Management is why Goldman Sachs is consistently rated the best firm to work for and gets top ratings from clients all over the world. Superior management is why the firm earns more profit, develops more effective people, has made itself the market leader in the U.S., U.K, Germany, France, China, Japan, and in most major lines of banking business. No other firm comes close.
One of the things you will learn in The Partnership is just how Goldman succeeded in making themselves different from any other Wall Street firm. They learned early on that in order to survive, they had to not only make money, but create a culture that was universal, that demanded absolutely loyalty and, most importantly, act as one organism.
* Why does Goldman Sachs put so much weight on its culture?
Goldman Sachs culture works. In the complex, fast-changing, global, 24/7 securities business almost all the important decisions are made in highly specific and complex settings under great time pressure. These decisions cannot be made by headquarters and they cannot be deferred. They must be made locally by local market and business experts thousands of times every day.
Rules wont work. If rules were written for every type of decision in all those different businesses in all the worlds different markets in all the different cultures, the resulting Rule Book would be far too large and complex to read or use.
Culture its way of working is the universal stem cell that enables Goldman Sachs to operate so forcefully in so many different national markets and in so many different businesses.
* With all its different business activities all over the world, doesnt Goldman Sachs have problems with conflicts of interest?
Yes! The firm certainly has many, many conflicts of interest. While it could take a defensive approach and try to avoid or minimize those risks of conflicts, the firm believes the more realistic and effective approach is to recognize those risks, be candid about them with clients and counterparties, and actively manage the conflicts. The firm strives to deal with each of them in such thoughtful and effective ways that clients and customers will know Goldman Sachs can be trusted to manage conflicts better than any other firm.
This is, of course, an assumption of enormous responsibility particularly on the scale on which Goldman Sachs operates so it raises the obvious next question: Who will watch the watcher?
點擊鏈接進入中文版:
高盛帝國(上)
在华尔街这样巨鳄遍布的世界里,每年利润超过一亿美元,当然只还是小角色;每月利润超过一亿美元也遍地都是;而每周超过一亿美元利润的,或许才称得上是具有影响和竞争力的公司。 但是,在过去的零九年,有一家公司宣称,在它两百六十三个交易日中,有一百三十一天,它的日交易...
評分没有专业知识很难搞清楚他们到底在干什么,但是你可以清楚的看到他们确实很认真的在干!他们很多的原则和办事的想法程序都值得我们大多数人去学习跟进甚至超越!
評分忽然想到,一本书的好与不好很难说,完全在于我看这本书的目的,当我怀着一种目的买了一本书,却看了另一种结果,在我看来这不是一本好说。 也许很多东西都是因为泛滥了,写得太多,没有达到专业之人相得到的专业知识而变得没有意义。 亦或是因为我们太过于目的性看一本书,...
評分准确把握了市场经济的脉络,灵活、多变的市场营销策略,充分利用了大众的“羊群效应”心理,一个精明能干的CEO,一个富有战斗力的团队,这就是一个帝国崛起的根本。
評分该书已经入围2010第一财经信诚基金年度金融书籍(欢迎前来加入我们“年度金融书籍小组”http://www.douban.com/group/281617/)
2010.9.17 finished In five years, 5 ppl -> 1500 ppl.
评分哎,撫捲輕嘆啊。GS是一個王朝。
评分Sidney Weinberg, Gus Levy, John Whitehead, Bob Rubin, Steve Friedman, Jon Corzine, Hank Paulson, 這是GS從一個經營commercial paper小作坊擴展到投行,交易,資産管理業務最終締造多元盈利團隊決策的帝國該被銘記的名字。拋開事件後麵的偶然因素,結閤自己所經曆過的公司管理架構文化人事,能在數次市場衝擊下屹立不倒並能伺機而動調整方嚮的確需要從上而下無數人的眼界和執行力。現在的GS也到瞭一個轉摺口,除瞭IBD之外的主營業務都差強人意,在金融科技從2B到2C的布局能否讓公司重迴領軍地位?也許幾年後會有答案。BTW, 此書結構有點差,而且很多事件描述淺嘗輒止,讀的時候不能過分認真。
评分Sidney Weinberg, Gus Levy, John Whitehead, Bob Rubin, Steve Friedman, Jon Corzine, Hank Paulson, 這是GS從一個經營commercial paper小作坊擴展到投行,交易,資産管理業務最終締造多元盈利團隊決策的帝國該被銘記的名字。拋開事件後麵的偶然因素,結閤自己所經曆過的公司管理架構文化人事,能在數次市場衝擊下屹立不倒並能伺機而動調整方嚮的確需要從上而下無數人的眼界和執行力。現在的GS也到瞭一個轉摺口,除瞭IBD之外的主營業務都差強人意,在金融科技從2B到2C的布局能否讓公司重迴領軍地位?也許幾年後會有答案。BTW, 此書結構有點差,而且很多事件描述淺嘗輒止,讀的時候不能過分認真。
评分講不完的故事
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有