查爾斯·埃利斯,他在自己創立的Greenwich Associate國際谘詢事務所中擔任瞭30年的董事閤夥人並且為世界上幾乎所有的一流金融服務機構提供過谘詢服務。他曾是耶魯大學投資委員會主席和受托人、羅伯特伍德約翰遜基金會受托人、領航投資的董事、懷特黑德生物化學研究院的主席,並為亞洲、歐洲和北美的主要機構提供投資谘詢服務。他著有14本著作,包括:在《失敗者遊戲中取勝》和《喬威爾遜傳記》。
The jury is still out on what the future of Goldman Sachs will look like, but no one can argue that the 139 year old firm has been (and, if Warren Buffett has his way, will be) the dominant investment banker and dealer on Wall Street. What does Buffett see that we on the outside do not? Its all about the people.
Charles D. Ellis has written a landmark book that couldnt come at a better time. The Partnership: The Making of Goldman Sachs is the colorful and fascinating story of Goldmans rise to power through many life-threatening changes in markets, competition, and regulation. It tells the personal history of the men and women who built the worlds leading financial powerhouse from a firm that was disgraced and nearly destroyed in 1929, limped along as a break-even operation through the Depression and WWII, and, with only one special service and one improbable banker, began the rise that, in half a century, took Goldman Sachs to global leadership.
A conversation with Charles Ellis:
* Is Goldman Sachs really a lot better than other firms at managing risk?
The big difference is in the cumulative power of many small details. The difference in the speed, accuracy, and extent of communication inside the firm; the difference in intensity, focus, and disciplined toughness of the men and women hand selected to work there and real difference in recruiting, training, and compensation. All add up to a decisive advantage in management. Leaders and co-leaders manage Goldmans many business units with rigor and drive; risk management is the envy of other banks; and coordination is powerful across business units and markets around the world.
As every Olympic athlete knows, such small differences make all the difference between gold, silver or bronze or no medal at all. In the current, very difficult test, Goldman Sachs has come in 1st again.
* Goldman Sachs is often described as the best managed Wall Street firm. Is that true?
Yes, it is true. Goldman Sachs is the best managed Wall Street firm and the best led. Management is why Goldman Sachs is consistently rated the best firm to work for and gets top ratings from clients all over the world. Superior management is why the firm earns more profit, develops more effective people, has made itself the market leader in the U.S., U.K, Germany, France, China, Japan, and in most major lines of banking business. No other firm comes close.
One of the things you will learn in The Partnership is just how Goldman succeeded in making themselves different from any other Wall Street firm. They learned early on that in order to survive, they had to not only make money, but create a culture that was universal, that demanded absolutely loyalty and, most importantly, act as one organism.
* Why does Goldman Sachs put so much weight on its culture?
Goldman Sachs culture works. In the complex, fast-changing, global, 24/7 securities business almost all the important decisions are made in highly specific and complex settings under great time pressure. These decisions cannot be made by headquarters and they cannot be deferred. They must be made locally by local market and business experts thousands of times every day.
Rules wont work. If rules were written for every type of decision in all those different businesses in all the worlds different markets in all the different cultures, the resulting Rule Book would be far too large and complex to read or use.
Culture its way of working is the universal stem cell that enables Goldman Sachs to operate so forcefully in so many different national markets and in so many different businesses.
* With all its different business activities all over the world, doesnt Goldman Sachs have problems with conflicts of interest?
Yes! The firm certainly has many, many conflicts of interest. While it could take a defensive approach and try to avoid or minimize those risks of conflicts, the firm believes the more realistic and effective approach is to recognize those risks, be candid about them with clients and counterparties, and actively manage the conflicts. The firm strives to deal with each of them in such thoughtful and effective ways that clients and customers will know Goldman Sachs can be trusted to manage conflicts better than any other firm.
This is, of course, an assumption of enormous responsibility particularly on the scale on which Goldman Sachs operates so it raises the obvious next question: Who will watch the watcher?
點擊鏈接進入中文版:
高盛帝國(上)
看的真压抑,不过,不是说它写的不好! 他说,冰是睡着的水,你们是水,我也是,不过,我是睡着的水! 他一下子失踪了,心里只有一个信念,对党绝对——忠诚!哪怕是发小,爱的人,绝对保密,只为,四个字,绝对忠诚! 她,选择了离开,飞去了离他遥远的地方,美国。因...
評分前些日在一位证券业前辈家里喝茶,席间听他提到这本书,于是我趁着实习的间隙找来读了一读。 全书上下两本儿加起来六七百页的篇幅,用来介绍像高盛这样一家企业绝对不能算多,然而全书从高盛的发展、各项业务的兴起壮大洋洋洒洒拉出一根线,对于读者的耐性却也多少是个考验。 ...
評分高盛长期以来视中国为重要市场,自二十世纪九十年代初开始就把中国作为全球业务发展的重点地区。高盛集团入股了中国石化、中粮集团、金龙鱼等多家大型企业,并占有中国移动的股份,发动金融危机,整垮中国,扶持他们最大的市场——美国崛起。高盛的可怕,不在于它的强势,而是...
評分忽然想到,一本书的好与不好很难说,完全在于我看这本书的目的,当我怀着一种目的买了一本书,却看了另一种结果,在我看来这不是一本好说。 也许很多东西都是因为泛滥了,写得太多,没有达到专业之人相得到的专业知识而变得没有意义。 亦或是因为我们太过于目的性看一本书,...
評分作为世界最顶尖的投行之一,高盛声名在外,百年间能人异士又多,故事自然精彩。本书中确实有不少翔实的信息以及有趣的人物和轶事。然而,总体来说这本书看下来依然很辛苦。可以说,是题材本身的可读性在支撑着全书,作者的很多缺点让本书失色不少。 最明显的一个问题是,作者...
作為一個基本沒有商業頭腦的人,我十分喜愛閱讀商戰書籍,介就叫傳說中的意淫。。 終於看完瞭,比《最後的大佬》好看太多瞭,雖然《最後的大佬》聽起來比較拉風,但不知道是翻譯問題還是作者本身文筆欠佳,讀下來覺得很是平淡。 高盛這本刻畫人物則相當成功,尤其是第一任CEO,經曆可真夠美國夢的,怎麼沒人拍個傳記電影呢?非常適閤好萊塢啊。 缺點是三個翻譯水準不等,所以明顯有的篇章酣暢淋灕,有的篇章晦澀難懂。
评分寫的很好,不晦澀,很容易就一口氣讀很多。主要優點是: 1. 從g.s.發展的過程,瞭解到瞭華爾街産品發展的簡單曆史; 2. 作者做瞭很多功課,內容很紮實,觀點很突齣; 主要的缺點是編輯的很糟,人名等等很亂,同一個人,有時用名,有時用姓;很不容易搞清楚此人負責什麼,做瞭哪些貢獻, etc.
评分有點象流水賬,看到一半看不下去瞭
评分有點象流水賬,看到一半看不下去瞭
评分2.5星,題材好,但寫的真是……
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有