What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said

What Brown v. Board of Education Should Have Said pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

出版者:NYU Press
作者:Balkin, Jack M. 编
出品人:
页数:257
译者:
出版时间:2002-9-1
价格:USD 26.00
装帧:Paperback
isbn号码:9780814798904
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 美国宪法与最高法院 
  • 美国宪政 
  • 种族歧视 
  • 杂七杂八 
  • 布朗案 
  •  
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court's landmark 1954 decision ordering the desegregation of America's public schools, is perhaps the most famous case in American constitutional law. Criticized and even openly defied when first handed down, in half a century Brown has become a venerated symbol of equality and civil rights. Its meaning, however, remains as contested as the case is celebrated. In the decades since the original decision, constitutional interpreters of all stripes have found within it different meanings. Both supporters and opponents of affirmative action have claimed the mantle of "Brown", criticizing the other side for betraying its spirit. Meanwhile, the opinion itself has often been criticized as bland and uninspiring, carefully written to avoid controversy and maintain unanimity among the Justices. As the 50th anniversary of "Brown" approaches, America's schools are increasingly divided by race and class. Liberals and conservatives alike harbor profound regrets about the development of race relations since Brown, while disagreeing heatedly about the proper role of the courts in promoting civil equality and civil rights. In this volume, nine of America's top constitutional and civil rights experts have been challenged to rewrite the "Brown" decision as they would like it to have been written, incorporating what they now know about the subsequent history of the United States but making use of only those sources available at the time of the original decision. In addition, Jack Balkin gives a detailed introduction to the case, chronicling the history of the litigation in "Brown", and explaining the current debates over its legacy. Contributors include: Bruce Ackerman, Jack M Balkin, Derrick A. Bell, Drew S. Days, John Hart Ely, Catharine A. MacKinnon, Michael W. McConnell, Frank I Michelman, and Cass R. Sunstein.

具体描述

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

似乎没有roe v. wade那本好看,可能也是隔离本身不再是个有争议性的问题了,仍然有问题的是affirmative action和equal opportunity to education,所以很多讨论是围绕这个展开的。balkin的导言和判决写得特别清楚,后面很多反而没什么耐心看……

评分

似乎没有roe v. wade那本好看,可能也是隔离本身不再是个有争议性的问题了,仍然有问题的是affirmative action和equal opportunity to education,所以很多讨论是围绕这个展开的。balkin的导言和判决写得特别清楚,后面很多反而没什么耐心看……

评分

Balkin前面三篇文章写得都很好,后面九个人的意见里,Derrick Bell有些看头。我挺喜欢这种形式的。

评分

布朗案判决可能是美国宪政史上最不像法律判决的一份判决书。马歇尔时代确立的,靠严密扎实法律推理实现政治捭阖的传统,走在这里开始剥下逻辑的外衣,只剩博弈转圜了。把沃伦所有高调花哨的论证拆开来看,细节之处充满了立场的矛盾与论据的双标。贝尔教授的异议大概道出了令人失望的事实:和民权运动史上的许多事件一样,布朗案也许不配成为人们心目中那个划时代的判决,抽丝剥茧,它只是政治斗争顺风车的又一个产物。

评分

布朗案判决可能是美国宪政史上最不像法律判决的一份判决书。马歇尔时代确立的,靠严密扎实法律推理实现政治捭阖的传统,走在这里开始剥下逻辑的外衣,只剩博弈转圜了。把沃伦所有高调花哨的论证拆开来看,细节之处充满了立场的矛盾与论据的双标。贝尔教授的异议大概道出了令人失望的事实:和民权运动史上的许多事件一样,布朗案也许不配成为人们心目中那个划时代的判决,抽丝剥茧,它只是政治斗争顺风车的又一个产物。

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有