About the Author
Richard Sennett is professor of sociology at New York University and at The London School of Economics. Before becoming a sociologist, he studied music professionally. He has received many awards and honors, most recently the 2006 Hegel Prize for lifetime achievement in the humanities and social sciences. His previous books include The Corrosion of Character:The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism, The Fall of Public Man, Respect in a World of Inequality, and The Culture of New Capitalism, the last published by Yale University Press. He lives in New York and London.
Editorial Reviews
From The New Yorker
Sennett considers an array of artisans across different periods, from ancient Chinese chefs to contemporary mobile-phone designers, in this powerful meditation on the "skill of making things well." The template of craftsmanship, he finds, combines a "material consciousness" with a willingness to put in years of practice (a common estimate of the time required to master a craft is ten thousand hours) and a strategic acceptance of ambiguity, rather than an obsessive perfectionism. Sennett’s aim is to make us rethink the notion that society benefits most from a workforce trained to respond to the metamorphoses of a global economy. Ultimately, he writes, the difficulties and possibilities of craft can teach "techniques of experience" that help us relate to others, and lead to an "ethically satisfying" pride in one’s work.
Copyright © 2008 Click here to subscribe to The New Yorker
Review
"As Richard Sennett makes clear in this lucid and compelling book, craftsmanship once connected people to their work by conferring pride and meaning. The loss of craftsmanship-and of a society that values it-has impoverished us in ways we have long forgotten but Sennett helps us understand."-Robert B. Reich, Professor of Public Policy, University of California at Berkeley, and author of Supercapitalism: The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life (Robert B. Reich )
Product Description
Defining craftsmanship far more broadly than “skilled manual labor,” Richard Sennett maintains that the computer programmer, the doctor, the artist, and even the parent and citizen engage in a craftsman’s work. Craftsmanship names the basic human impulse to do a job well for its own sake, says the author, and good craftsmanship involves developing skills and focusing on the work rather than ourselves. In this thought-provoking book, one of our most distinguished public intellectuals explores the work of craftsmen past and present, identifies deep connections between material consciousness and ethical values, and challenges received ideas about what constitutes good work in today’s world.
The Craftsman engages the many dimensions of skill—from the technical demands to the obsessive energy required to do good work. Craftsmanship leads Sennett across time and space, from ancient Roman brickmakers to Renaissance goldsmiths to the printing presses of Enlightenment Paris and the factories of industrial London; in the modern world he explores what experiences of good work are shared by computer programmers, nurses and doctors, musicians, glassblowers, and cooks. Unique in the scope of his thinking, Sennett expands previous notions of crafts and craftsmen and apprises us of the surprising extent to which we can learn about ourselves through the labor of making physical things.
当人们在设定希腊诸神时,将潘多拉与赫菲斯托斯作为“匠人”的代表,前者美丽却邪恶危险,后者丑陋却善良勤劳,从某种意义上体现了西方文化对于匠人身份的认同矛盾。正如理查德•桑内特概括的那样:“无法将双手和大脑联系起来,无法承认和鼓励人们内心有从事匠艺活动的欲望...
评分当人们还在探讨和质疑我们这个时代文化之中缺乏“工匠精神”的时候,美国著名的社会学家、思想家理查德•桑内特则创作了一本《匠人》,以说明每个人都具备有匠人的精神和成为匠人的潜质。 作为当代的社会学家、思想家理查德•桑内特为我们找寻出了“匠人”...
评分《匠人》这本书信息超载,很难总结,让人浮想联翩。 在工作中学到一个词汇,叫“以终为始”,以结果倒推工作要求。这是一个听起来行之有效的管理方法。这种“不问过程的功利”,正是《匠人》想要探讨的,可能会对“大脑”造成伤害,同时想要反复证明——“不问结果的专注”之...
评分如今,在媒体和社会的大肆渲染下,“匠人精神”俨然已成为时兴的热词。可仔细想想,我们之所以提“匠人精神”,是出于对高质量产品的崇拜,而我们对匠人本身又有多少关注呢?在本书中,我们看到的不再是对“匠人精神”浅薄地讴歌,而是对匠人群体与他们的匠艺工作的分析与思考...
评分舊了壞了的東西,我們多數會棄掉。逛街的時候,我們多數會選購新款的產品,只要好樣價錢平就是。然後產品愈出愈新愈快,我們變相只為了消費而消費。再然後買回家的東西未舊未壞我們便想棄掉,因為每天的廣告都叫我們要勤力消費……這是現代人的生活寫照,這是資本主義社會的基...
文章写完,这书读了一半。“匠人的自觉”
评分Just thought-provoking and vision-expanding. A great heuristic!Three types of material consciousness; an argument against Arendt's negative/simplified notion of labor in her political theory; a loosely historical and sociological work situated in pragmatism with a contributing concept of "the craft of experience" within this school of thoughts.
评分好题目,好课题,在延续森奈特的一贯写法之外,算是写得比较潦草的一本。作为社会学家剖析手艺、匠作、艺人的历史条件,不乏洞见,却又不算深刻,说论证,又没有过程,说历史,又散得很。其中,有关“物质性意识”、“手的能力演化”、“匠作三种类型的突破方式”,都跟建筑有关联,其中谈到的van eyck的游戏场设计、盖里的毕尔巴鄂博物馆的表皮工业设计过程,以及把卢斯和维根斯坦对待建筑得态度所做的对比,倒是跟建筑直接有关。书中,特别批判了西方城市规划师多会设计中心,不会设计边缘,多会设计实在的隔离的墙,却不会设计穿越的界面
评分文章写完,这书读了一半。“匠人的自觉”
评分汉娜阿伦特的学生,开篇对汉娜阿伦特的“平庸之恶”作出很犀利的批判——指出这可能是个精英要向工匠学习的年代。包含许多实用主义化的tim ingold的概念,如resistance&ambiguity一章便对应了ingold的being alive的第一章。论述例子多为建筑相关。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有