A Duty to Resist pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Candice Delmas is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy and Political Science at Northeastern University and the Associate Director of the Politics, Philosophy, and Economics Program. She previously served as a Dworkin-Balzan Fellow at New York University School of Law from 2016 to 2017. She works in moral, social, political, and legal philosophy.
- 英文
- 政治哲學
- 公民不服从
- politics
- disobey
- disobedience
- Politics
- 2018
What are our responsibilities in the face of injustice? How far should we go to fight it? Many would argue that as long as a state is nearly just, citizens have a moral duty to obey the law. Proponents of civil disobedience generally hold that, given this moral duty, a person needs a solid justification to break the law. But activists from Henry David Thoreau and Mohandas Gandhi to the Movement for Black Lives have long recognized that there are times when, rather than having a duty to obey the law, we have a duty to disobey it.
Taking seriously the history of this activism, A Duty to Resist wrestles with the problem of political obligation in real world societies that harbor injustice. Candice Delmas argues that the duty of justice, the principle of fairness, the Samaritan duty, and political association impose responsibility to resist under conditions of injustice. We must expand political obligation to include a duty to resist unjust laws and social conditions even in legitimate states.
For Delmas, this duty to resist demands principled disobedience, and such disobedience need not always be civil. At times, covert, violent, evasive, or offensive acts of lawbreaking can be justified, even required. Delmas defends the viability and necessity of illegal assistance to undocumented migrants, leaks of classified information, distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, sabotage, armed self-defense, guerrilla art, and other modes of resistance. There are limits: principle alone does not justify law breaking. But uncivil disobedience can sometimes be not only permissible but required in the effort to resist injustice.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
好看（举了很多历史实例）但启发性有限，虽然我是倾向于赞同作者的主要观点的。那么多文章讨论civil disobedience是不是一种moral right，这本书论述的则是civil 甚至uncivil disobedience是一种义务。
评分好看（举了很多历史实例）但启发性有限，虽然我是倾向于赞同作者的主要观点的。那么多文章讨论civil disobedience是不是一种moral right，这本书论述的则是civil 甚至uncivil disobedience是一种义务。
评分好看（举了很多历史实例）但启发性有限，虽然我是倾向于赞同作者的主要观点的。那么多文章讨论civil disobedience是不是一种moral right，这本书论述的则是civil 甚至uncivil disobedience是一种义务。
评分好看（举了很多历史实例）但启发性有限，虽然我是倾向于赞同作者的主要观点的。那么多文章讨论civil disobedience是不是一种moral right，这本书论述的则是civil 甚至uncivil disobedience是一种义务。
评分好看（举了很多历史实例）但启发性有限，虽然我是倾向于赞同作者的主要观点的。那么多文章讨论civil disobedience是不是一种moral right，这本书论述的则是civil 甚至uncivil disobedience是一种义务。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有