Book Description
Amartya Sen argues that "the standard of living" has been poorly understood and narrowly defined; it is not just a function of opulence, and cannot be seen as utility. It is, he suggests, the "capabilities" offered in states of affairs. In his comments, Bernard Williams considers the conceptual connections among Sen's capabilities, economic welfare, and the broader notion of "well-being", and asks whether the notion raises questions of justice. Ravi Kanbur considers the implications of the uncertainty in the choice that might be thought to be one desirable capability. John Muellbauer offers a specification of choice, and discusses the importance, for assessing capabilities, of the relation between preferences and constraints and between preferences themselves. Keith Hart explores the issue for those societies in which economic life is not fully "commoditized" and in which, therefore, it does not always make sense to reduce things to a price. Sen concludes with replies to these comments.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
Sen通过utility、opulence的剖析，最终用功能活动和可行能力来度量生活水准，精彩！Revin Kanbur的论文中引入不确定性是个好思路。最开始读的是中译本，换成原版是因为（1）好几处地方中文都难以理解，换成原文就清晰易懂（2）另一个更直接的原因是两个同学将封面上的书名看成了“性活水准”。
评分Sen通过utility、opulence的剖析，最终用功能活动和可行能力来度量生活水准，精彩！Revin Kanbur的论文中引入不确定性是个好思路。最开始读的是中译本，换成原版是因为（1）好几处地方中文都难以理解，换成原文就清晰易懂（2）另一个更直接的原因是两个同学将封面上的书名看成了“性活水准”。
评分Sen通过utility、opulence的剖析，最终用功能活动和可行能力来度量生活水准，精彩！Revin Kanbur的论文中引入不确定性是个好思路。最开始读的是中译本，换成原版是因为（1）好几处地方中文都难以理解，换成原文就清晰易懂（2）另一个更直接的原因是两个同学将封面上的书名看成了“性活水准”。
评分Sen通过utility、opulence的剖析，最终用功能活动和可行能力来度量生活水准，精彩！Revin Kanbur的论文中引入不确定性是个好思路。最开始读的是中译本，换成原版是因为（1）好几处地方中文都难以理解，换成原文就清晰易懂（2）另一个更直接的原因是两个同学将封面上的书名看成了“性活水准”。
评分Sen通过utility、opulence的剖析，最终用功能活动和可行能力来度量生活水准，精彩！Revin Kanbur的论文中引入不确定性是个好思路。最开始读的是中译本，换成原版是因为（1）好几处地方中文都难以理解，换成原文就清晰易懂（2）另一个更直接的原因是两个同学将封面上的书名看成了“性活水准”。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有