圖書標籤: 曆史  科學史  十七世紀  世界史  socialist  STS  Robert_Merton   

喜歡 Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England 的讀者還喜歡

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

记得以前看过一篇文章，里面写的是大文豪列夫·托尔斯泰的读书方式 ，每当他拿起一本文学书，总是先认真的看看书名，然后默默的想如果是自己拿到这个题目的话，该如何写作，假如该书的构架、内容之类的和自己的一样，那么他就不用再看这本书了，只有当这本书里面的内容和自...  

看起来那叫一个没味道啊，不过公选课作业要求看它才硬着头皮去看。书内容不多，附注倒是很多，但是这不多的内容看起来还是很慢看完了都不知道在说什么，总体感觉就是用整本书去论证一个观点，清教主义对科学很重要。。。  

看起来那叫一个没味道啊，不过公选课作业要求看它才硬着头皮去看。书内容不多，附注倒是很多，但是这不多的内容看起来还是很慢看完了都不知道在说什么，总体感觉就是用整本书去论证一个观点，清教主义对科学很重要。。。  

默顿被尊为科学社会学之父，其学识和功力从这本书可见一斑。然而， 基督徒们对该书的误解、曲解、谣传简直罄竹难书。 1、默顿在1970年写的再版前言中反复声明，很多人曲解了该书。其实该书并非要证明基督教信仰是促进英国现代科学发展的“最”重要原因！ 2、该书的观点：促进...