图书标签: 历史  科学史  十七世纪  世界史  socialist  STS  Robert_Merton   

喜欢 Science, Technology & Society in Seventeenth-Century England 的读者还喜欢

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

The Merton Thesis: the role of Puritanism and the "foci of interest"in the making of science.For now, I have no interest in the first part, which resembles Weber's Protestant ethics in the making of capitalism. I am more interested in elaborating social and economic conditions affecting scientific activities.

十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会》 　　 　　著者：[美] 罗伯特·金·默顿 　　译者：范岱年等 　　出版者：商务印书馆2002年4月第2版 　　 　　美国科学史家罗伯特·金·默顿著。记得去年12月我在工人体育场冬季书市凛冽的寒风中看到这本书的时候，正对近代航海技术和军事技...  

“什么是科学？”“什么是技术？”“科学在我们的社会中该摆在哪个位置？”······带着许许多多的疑问拿起了这本《十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会》。没能说看完之后立马对“科学”“技术”“社会”以及它们的关系有了很清晰的理解，但至少有了点入门的感觉。这，是我...  

“什么是科学？”“什么是技术？”“科学在我们的社会中该摆在哪个位置？”······带着许许多多的疑问拿起了这本《十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会》。没能说看完之后立马对“科学”“技术”“社会”以及它们的关系有了很清晰的理解，但至少有了点入门的感觉。这，是我...  

摘录一段书评： 全文在此： http://cfyang2005.blog.163.com/blog/static/491040632010614112834929/ 外史论的观点既给科技史的研究开辟了一条新的道路，但它也存在着自己的缺陷。如1959年，科学史家吉里斯皮(C.C.Gillispie)对因默顿等人工作而影响渐强的外史研究，表达了他...