Summer for the Gods

Summer for the Gods pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

出版者:Basic Books
作者:Edward J. Larson
出品人:
页数:336
译者:
出版时间:2006-10-2
价格:USD 16.95
装帧:Paperback
isbn号码:9780465075102
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 进化论 
  • 神创论 
  • 猴子审判 
  • 普利策奖 
  • 威廉·詹宁斯·布赖斯 
  • 克拉伦斯·丹诺 
  • 世界历史 
  • HistoryOfScience 
  •  
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

Reissued with a new preface: the Pulitzer Prize-winning book that is "quite simply the best book ever written on the Scopes Trial and its place in American history and myth." In the summer of 1925, the sleepy hamlet of Dayton, Tennessee, became the setting for one of the 20th century's most contentious dramas: the Scopes trial that pit William Jennings Bryan and the anti-Darwinists against a teacher named John Scopes into a famous debate over science, religion, and their place in public education. That trial marked the start of a battle that continues to this day--in Dover, Pennsylvania, Kansas, Cobb County, Georgia, and many other cities and states throughout the country. Edward Larson's classic, Summer for the Gods , received the Pulitzer Prize in History in 1998 and is the single most authoritative account of a pivotal event whose combatants remain at odds in school districts and courtrooms. For this edition, Larson has added a new preface that assesses the state of the battle between creationism and evolution, and points the way to how it might potentially be resolved.

具体描述

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

Scopes trial也是galileo的时间平移。和教会一样,基督教协会虽然其逻辑并无错误,100% valid,但是却并不apply to this case。正确的辩论应是两边分别证实,而并不是套用己方的框架和逻辑来证对方的伪。但虽然错误的方式已经进行了,最后scopes方用同样错误的逻辑赢得辩论:用对方的框架来证对方的伪。也是很喜

评分

Scopes trial也是galileo的时间平移。和教会一样,基督教协会虽然其逻辑并无错误,100% valid,但是却并不apply to this case。正确的辩论应是两边分别证实,而并不是套用己方的框架和逻辑来证对方的伪。但虽然错误的方式已经进行了,最后scopes方用同样错误的逻辑赢得辩论:用对方的框架来证对方的伪。也是很喜

评分

Scopes trial也是galileo的时间平移。和教会一样,基督教协会虽然其逻辑并无错误,100% valid,但是却并不apply to this case。正确的辩论应是两边分别证实,而并不是套用己方的框架和逻辑来证对方的伪。但虽然错误的方式已经进行了,最后scopes方用同样错误的逻辑赢得辩论:用对方的框架来证对方的伪。也是很喜

评分

Scopes trial也是galileo的时间平移。和教会一样,基督教协会虽然其逻辑并无错误,100% valid,但是却并不apply to this case。正确的辩论应是两边分别证实,而并不是套用己方的框架和逻辑来证对方的伪。但虽然错误的方式已经进行了,最后scopes方用同样错误的逻辑赢得辩论:用对方的框架来证对方的伪。也是很喜

评分

Scopes trial也是galileo的时间平移。和教会一样,基督教协会虽然其逻辑并无错误,100% valid,但是却并不apply to this case。正确的辩论应是两边分别证实,而并不是套用己方的框架和逻辑来证对方的伪。但虽然错误的方式已经进行了,最后scopes方用同样错误的逻辑赢得辩论:用对方的框架来证对方的伪。也是很喜

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有