Chalmers was elected a fellow of the Academy of Humanities in 1997. His primary research interest is the philosophy of science and he is author of the best-selling textbook What Is This Thing Called Science? which has been translated into many languages.
He has been a visiting scholar at the Flinders University Philosophy Department since 1999. For the 2007 fall semester he was a visiting professor at the University of Pittsburgh.
Chalmers is an associate professor at the History and Philosophy of Science department of the University of Sydney.
Books:
Science and Its Fabrication, Open University Press and University of Minnesota Press, 1990, pp. 142+xii. (Translated into French, German, Dutch, Spanish, Korean, Portuguese and Chinese.)
What Is This Thing Called Science?, 3rd revised edition, University of Queensland Press, Hackett, 1999. (Originally published 1976; second edition: 1982.)
The Scientist's Atom and the Philosopher's Stone – How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms, Springer, 2009, pp. 288+xii.
查尔莫斯的这本《科学究竟是什么》是研究生阶段课程主要参考书,本来是带着对科学本质的认知去看这本书的,本来设想学罢应该对科学的概念更加明晰,但结果只能说“始于迷茫,走向更大的迷茫”。 从最后一次课,大家的讨论就可看出,全班对查尔莫斯的科学...
评分比较简单的科学哲学书籍,读的深入的话还是有所收获的,前几章非常清晰,后面批判归纳之后有些不如之前简明,可能因为问题也更加复杂了,或许由于出版时间关系本书只说道费耶阿本德,对于劳丹,邦格等没有叙述。
评分比较简单的科学哲学书籍,读的深入的话还是有所收获的,前几章非常清晰,后面批判归纳之后有些不如之前简明,可能因为问题也更加复杂了,或许由于出版时间关系本书只说道费耶阿本德,对于劳丹,邦格等没有叙述。
评分否定实证主义(归纳逻辑)及否证主义的论证很精彩。库恩和拉卡托斯的理论,在我看来就像是以太,毫无用处,完全可以用奥卡姆剃刀给他刮的干干净净(什么都想说明,而又什么也讲不清)。无政府主义我很喜欢,但是作者有过度演绎无政府主义,甚至有些扭曲该理论的嫌疑(有太多矛...
评分写在前面: 这篇文章并非专为这本书所写,但确实是很大程度上受到这本书的影响才写的。是一组在写的文章之一。另一篇是:《“方差”漫谈之一:从人和猴子说起》(http://www.douban.com/note/256625376/)希望有兴趣的朋友能来交流指正~ 正文: 凭借一...
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有