圖書標籤: 藝術史 藝術 老師推薦❤ pamela_lee Pamela M. Lee
发表于2024-11-22
Chronophobia pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024
In the 1960s art fell out of time; both artists and critics lost their temporal bearings in response to what E. M. Cioran called "not being entitled to time." This anxiety and uneasiness about time, which Pamela Lee calls "chronophobia," cut across movements, media, and genres, and was figured in works ranging from kinetic sculptures to Andy Warhol films. Despite its pervasiveness, the subject of time and 1960s art has gone largely unexamined in historical accounts of the period. Chronophobia is the first critical attempt to define this obsession and analyze it in relation to art and technology. Lee discusses the chronophobia of art relative to the emergence of the Information Age in postwar culture. The accompanying rapid technological transformations, including the advent of computers and automation processes, produced for many an acute sense of historical unknowing; the seemingly accelerated pace of life began to outstrip any attempts to make sense of the present. Lee sees the attitude of 1960s art to time as a historical prelude to our current fixation on time and speed within digital culture. Reflecting upon the 1960s cultural anxiety about temporality, she argues, helps us historicize our current relation to technology and time. After an introductory framing of terms, Lee discusses such topics as "presentness" with repect to the interest in systems theory in 1960s art; kinetic sculpture and new forms of global media; the temporality of the body and the spatialization of the visual image in the paintings of Bridget Riley and the performance art of Carolee Schneemann; Robert Smithson's interest in seriality and futurity, considered in light of his reading of George Kubler's important work The Shape of Time: Remarks on the History of Things and Norbert Wiener's discussion of cybernetics; and the endless belaboring of the present in sixties art, as seen in Warhol's Empire and the work of On Kawara.
Pamela M. Lee is Associate Professor of Art and Art History at Stanford University. She is the author of Object to be Destroyed: The Work of Gordon Matta-Clark (MIT Press, 1999)
非常theoretical。Lee的方法很有意思。研究藝術和藝術的技術環境。這對於六十年代的藝術是再適閤不過的瞭。藝術與技術之間的關係也是Lee所有作品的核心問題。Lee從自己的角度讀瞭很多經典的藝術史文獻。這點其實很值得學。讀懂文獻當然重要,但是如果沒有自己的角度,文獻是沒有辦法變成論文的。其實任何一種好的切入角度都是寄生。Lee對於Kubler的解讀很不錯,但是我覺得她過分強調K對於生物比喻的批評瞭。畢竟Cybernetics本身就是一種生物比喻,不論是Kubler還是Wiener都是逃不開的。這種解讀的後果是環境的透明化。而且K其實並沒有拋棄生物比喻,L忽略瞭他對“變異 (mutant)”這個生物比喻的討論。
評分非常theoretical。Lee的方法很有意思。研究藝術和藝術的技術環境。這對於六十年代的藝術是再適閤不過的瞭。藝術與技術之間的關係也是Lee所有作品的核心問題。Lee從自己的角度讀瞭很多經典的藝術史文獻。這點其實很值得學。讀懂文獻當然重要,但是如果沒有自己的角度,文獻是沒有辦法變成論文的。其實任何一種好的切入角度都是寄生。Lee對於Kubler的解讀很不錯,但是我覺得她過分強調K對於生物比喻的批評瞭。畢竟Cybernetics本身就是一種生物比喻,不論是Kubler還是Wiener都是逃不開的。這種解讀的後果是環境的透明化。而且K其實並沒有拋棄生物比喻,L忽略瞭他對“變異 (mutant)”這個生物比喻的討論。
評分非常theoretical。Lee的方法很有意思。研究藝術和藝術的技術環境。這對於六十年代的藝術是再適閤不過的瞭。藝術與技術之間的關係也是Lee所有作品的核心問題。Lee從自己的角度讀瞭很多經典的藝術史文獻。這點其實很值得學。讀懂文獻當然重要,但是如果沒有自己的角度,文獻是沒有辦法變成論文的。其實任何一種好的切入角度都是寄生。Lee對於Kubler的解讀很不錯,但是我覺得她過分強調K對於生物比喻的批評瞭。畢竟Cybernetics本身就是一種生物比喻,不論是Kubler還是Wiener都是逃不開的。這種解讀的後果是環境的透明化。而且K其實並沒有拋棄生物比喻,L忽略瞭他對“變異 (mutant)”這個生物比喻的討論。
評分一開始不喜歡這樣的寫作風格來寫史。但是習慣瞭倒覺得,我也能這樣寫啊。雖然有一章跟我興趣關係不大的沒讀但是暫且也不會讀瞭。所以先算看完瞭吧。(首頁友鄰能否看到這種標記廣播啊啊啊啊看到瞭吱一聲啊啊啊啊憋死我瞭!!!
評分非常theoretical。Lee的方法很有意思。研究藝術和藝術的技術環境。這對於六十年代的藝術是再適閤不過的瞭。藝術與技術之間的關係也是Lee所有作品的核心問題。Lee從自己的角度讀瞭很多經典的藝術史文獻。這點其實很值得學。讀懂文獻當然重要,但是如果沒有自己的角度,文獻是沒有辦法變成論文的。其實任何一種好的切入角度都是寄生。Lee對於Kubler的解讀很不錯,但是我覺得她過分強調K對於生物比喻的批評瞭。畢竟Cybernetics本身就是一種生物比喻,不論是Kubler還是Wiener都是逃不開的。這種解讀的後果是環境的透明化。而且K其實並沒有拋棄生物比喻,L忽略瞭他對“變異 (mutant)”這個生物比喻的討論。
評分
評分
評分
評分
Chronophobia pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024