http://www.cambridge.org/cn/academic/subjects/archaeology/archaeology-asia-sub-saharan-africa-and-pacific/ancient-china-and-its-eurasian-neighbors-artefacts-and-cross-cultural-interactions-3000-700-bce?format=HB#vjJit9fv0Spej6Vl.97
This volume examines the role of objects in the region north of early dynastic state centers, at the intersection of Ancient China and Eurasia, a large area that stretches from Xinjiang to the China Sea, from c.3000 BCE to the mid-eighth century BCE. This area was a frontier, an ambiguous space that lay at the margins of direct political control by the metropolitan states, where local and colonial ideas and practices were reconstructed transculturally. These identities were often merged and displayed in material culture. Types of objects, styles, and iconography were often hybrids or new to the region, as were the tomb assemblages in which they were deposited and found. Patrons commissioned objects that marked a symbolic vision of place and person and that could mobilize support, legitimize rule, and bind people together. Through close examination of key artifacts, this book untangles the considerable changes in political structure and cultural makeup of ancient Chinese states and their northern neighbors.
In this book, Inner Asia is studied for its own sake, not as an adjunct of China, challenging the China-centered view of ancient Inner Asia
Allows a view of material culture in action - objects, whoever designed them, were chosen for a purpose which gives a fresh view to the study of objects and their agency, especially in mortuary settings
Uses a new way of describing human groupings, such as technoiscapes, regionscapes, lineagescapes, and individualscapes, which insists on a re-evaluation of archaeological cultures as a defining category of human grouping
Katheryn M. Linduff, University of Pittsburgh
Katheryn M. Linduff is a Professor in the Departments of Art History and Anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh. She has engaged in art historical research and collaborative archaeological fieldwork, focusing on the prehistory, and Bronze and Iron Ages of the Inner Asian Frontier for many years. She has published extensively on metallurgy, gender, China and Eurasia, the archaeology of the Inner Asian Frontier, and on artifacts. Recently, she has published an edited volume with Bryan Hanks for Cambridge (2009) that focuses on issues of social complexity in the Late Prehistoric Period of the Eurasian Steppe and several articles on the transmission of metallurgical knowledge and artifacts across the frontiers to the north and west of the early Chinese Empires.
Cao Wei, Shaanxi Normal University, China
Cao Wei is a historian, a field archaeologist, and a scholar specializing in the study of ancient Chinese bronzes. He was previously a senior research fellow and the deputy director of the Museum of the Terracotta Army of the Qin Emperor in Shaanxi, China. He currently holds a professorship at Shaanxi Normal University. He serves as a board member of the Association for the Study of the Yin/Shang Culture. His primary research and publications have focused on Zhou period bronzes and their uses in ritual practice.
Yan Sun, Gettysburg College, Pennsylvania
Yan Sun is a Professor of art history at the Gettysburg College in Pennsylvania. Her research and publications focus on the rise of regional bronze cultures in north China and the interplay between material culture, identities and power of Bronze Age China. Her recent publications include two bronze catalogues Shang date Bronzes from Hanzhong (2006) and Bronzes from Northern Shaanxi (2009) (both co-edited with Cao Wei), and studies on material culture and social identities in Western Zhou's frontier (2013) and gift giving and social network in Western Zhou regional state Yan (2017).
Yuanqing Liu, Shaanxi Normal University, China
Yuanqing Liu is a Ph.D. candidate at Shaanxi Normal University, completing a dissertation on the regional bronze cultures in Northwestern China of the second and first millennium BCE. She spent one year as a visiting graduate student at the University of Pittsburgh, where she helped to collect and analyze the vast amount of previously undigested literature and materials from the northwest of current day China in the period from ca. 1000–800 BCE.
评分
评分
评分
评分
当我看到《Ancient China and its Eurasian Neighbors》这本书名时,我的脑海里立刻闪过无数古代战争的画面。想想看,古代中国,特别是汉唐时期,其军事力量在欧亚大陆上可谓是响当当的存在。这本书,我预感它绝不仅仅是讲述那些经典的战役,比如汉武帝对匈奴的几次大规模征讨,或者唐朝对西突厥的作战。我更期待的是,它能深入分析这些军事行动背后的战略考量,以及对周边地区产生的长期地缘政治影响。比如,汉朝击败匈奴后,对西域的控制是如何形成的?这种控制又如何进一步促进了商贸和文化交流?唐朝的边疆政策又是怎样的?它如何平衡与各个游牧民族的关系,既有战争也有册封和羁縻?书名中的“Neighbors”也暗示着,这本书应该会从一个更加平等的视角来审视这些关系,而不是仅仅从“中国中心论”的角度出发。我希望看到对那些“邻居”们军事力量、战术策略的分析,他们是如何抵抗强大的中原王朝,或者是在何种情况下选择臣服?这本书,或许能为我们揭示古代欧亚大陆上,一场场规模宏大、影响深远的军事竞赛。
评分我最近偶然翻到一本关于古代中国与欧亚邻居的书,书名听起来就很有分量:《Ancient China and its Eurasian Neighbors》。光看名字,我就能想象到它一定是一部宏大的史诗,描绘了那个遥远时代,以中国为中心,周边那些形形色色的国家和民族是如何互动、碰撞、融合的。我脑海中浮现出连绵起伏的草原,漫漫黄沙的戈壁,以及穿梭其间的骆驼商队,它们承载着丝绸、瓷器、香料,也传递着文化、思想和技术。我期待在这本书里,能看到张骞出使西域的壮丽图景,能感受到汉朝强大的军事力量如何威慑周边,也能了解到匈奴、月氏等游牧民族是如何与中原王朝展开复杂的政治军事斗争。更重要的是,我希望能深入了解这些“邻居”们本身的历史文化,他们是怎样独立发展的,又是在怎样的机缘巧合下与中国产生了联系。比如,伊朗高原上的波斯帝国,地中海东岸的希腊化王国,甚至更远的罗马帝国,他们之间是否存在着某种隐秘的联系?在贸易、战争、文化交流的背后,是否存在着一条我们尚未完全理解的欧亚大陆的古代世界格局?这本书无疑提供了一个绝佳的窗口,让我能够窥探那个充满神秘与活力的古代世界。
评分这本书的名字《Ancient China and its Eurasian Neighbors》简直像是一张开启想象的大门。我一直对那种宏大叙事、跨越时空的长篇历史有着莫名的迷恋,特别是涉及到文明的碰撞与交流。试想一下,在那个信息传播缓慢的时代,远隔千山万水的人们是如何建立联系的?丝绸之路不仅仅是一条简单的贸易通道,它更是一条文化、宗教、技术和思想的动脉。我希望这本书能详细阐述这一点,不仅仅是列举出有哪些商品在交换,更希望能深入探讨这些交换背后带来的深远影响。例如,佛教是如何从印度传入中国,又在中国经历了怎样的本土化过程?中国的造纸术、火药等技术又是如何西传,对欧洲乃至整个世界产生了怎样的革命性影响?书名中的“Eurasian Neighbors”也让我非常好奇,除了我们熟知的匈奴、突厥、蒙古等,书中还会提及哪些被我们忽视的古代民族?他们的社会结构、政治制度、宗教信仰是怎样的?他们与中原王朝的交往,究竟是单纯的征服与被征服,还是存在着更多复杂的合作与博弈?我期待书中能够呈现出更加立体、多元的古代欧亚大陆图景,让我们看到一个更加互联互通的古代世界。
评分《Ancient China and its Eurasian Neighbors》这个书名,一下子就勾起了我对古代文明交流的强烈兴趣。我一直认为,人类文明的发展从来都不是孤立的,而是通过不断的互动、借鉴和融合才得以进步。这本书,我把它想象成是一幅描绘古代欧亚大陆文化交融的壮丽画卷。我期待它能细致地梳理出,除了我们熟知的丝绸之路,还有哪些其他的文化传播路径。比如,海上贸易在古代是否也扮演了重要的角色?中国的瓷器、漆器等工艺是如何影响到其他地区的?同时,我也对来自其他文明的元素在中国古代社会中的体现非常感兴趣。比如,西域的音乐、舞蹈、宗教,甚至是一些生活习俗,它们是如何被中国社会所接纳和改造的?书中是否会探讨不同文明在哲学、艺术、科技等领域相互启发的具体案例?我希望它能展现出一种更加丰富和动态的文明互动模式,让我们看到,古代中国和它的欧亚邻居们,并非是泾渭分明的独立体,而是在长期的交往中,相互塑造、共同演进的。
评分我最近被《Ancient China and its Eurasian Neighbors》这本书深深吸引。虽然我还没来得及细读,但光是书名就让我充满了期待。我脑海中浮现的是一张巨大的古代世界地图,上面标注着中国,以及向西延伸至地中海的广阔区域。我猜测这本书会详细介绍在那个遥远的时代,中国是如何与这些位于欧亚大陆上的不同民族和国家建立联系的。我想象中,它会细致地描述当时中国周边存在的政治格局,有哪些强大的帝国,有哪些游牧民族,又有哪些分散的小国。更重要的是,我期待它能深入探讨这些不同的文明体之间是如何进行交往的。除了贸易和战争,我还对文化、思想、宗教的传播充满了好奇。比如,中国的政治制度、哲学思想是否对周边国家产生了影响?同样,来自其他文明的思想和观念,又是如何被中国所吸收和融合的?这本书,我希望它能带领我穿越时空的迷雾,去感受那个时代欧亚大陆的脉搏,去理解中国在其中扮演的角色,以及它与那些“邻居”们之间错综复杂、充满魅力的互动关系。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有