Richard Tuck traces the history of the distinction between sovereignty and government and its relevance to the development of democratic thought. Tuck shows that this was a central issue in the political debates of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and provides a new interpretation of the political thought of Bodin, Hobbes and Rousseau. Integrating legal theory and the history of political thought, he also provides one of the first modern histories of the constitutional referendum, and shows the importance of the United States in the history of the referendum. The book derives from the John Robert Seeley Lectures delivered by Richard Tuck at the University of Cambridge in 2012, and will appeal to students and scholars of the history of ideas, political theory and political philosophy.
评分
评分
评分
评分
Bodin的部分很精彩,为啥有种Tuck离剑桥学派越来越远的即视感。
评分Tuck发现的现象很重要,对霍布斯的分析也凸显了《论公民》到《利维坦》的巨大思想推进。但是对于每个思想家的解释都太历史化,反倒错失了关键
评分太狭隘了吧
评分Bodin的部分很精彩,为啥有种Tuck离剑桥学派越来越远的即视感。
评分Tuck发现的现象很重要,对霍布斯的分析也凸显了《论公民》到《利维坦》的巨大思想推进。但是对于每个思想家的解释都太历史化,反倒错失了关键
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有