評分
評分
評分
評分
strip causality from form, boundary belongs to the phenomenon and not to the formal surface, the once privileged surface becomes incidental, move towards architecture of "the campfire". Banham之後講瞭這麼多年, 真正做到building scale可能隻有transsolar? 為什麼大傢對這個不感興趣呢? how is this not architecture????
评分strip causality from form, boundary belongs to the phenomenon and not to the formal surface, the once privileged surface becomes incidental, move towards architecture of "the campfire". Banham之後講瞭這麼多年, 真正做到building scale可能隻有transsolar? 為什麼大傢對這個不感興趣呢? how is this not architecture????
评分strip causality from form, boundary belongs to the phenomenon and not to the formal surface, the once privileged surface becomes incidental, move towards architecture of "the campfire". Banham之後講瞭這麼多年, 真正做到building scale可能隻有transsolar? 為什麼大傢對這個不感興趣呢? how is this not architecture????
评分strip causality from form, boundary belongs to the phenomenon and not to the formal surface, the once privileged surface becomes incidental, move towards architecture of "the campfire". Banham之後講瞭這麼多年, 真正做到building scale可能隻有transsolar? 為什麼大傢對這個不感興趣呢? how is this not architecture????
评分strip causality from form, boundary belongs to the phenomenon and not to the formal surface, the once privileged surface becomes incidental, move towards architecture of "the campfire". Banham之後講瞭這麼多年, 真正做到building scale可能隻有transsolar? 為什麼大傢對這個不感興趣呢? how is this not architecture????
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有