Homesickness

Homesickness pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

Carlos Rojas is Associate Professor of Chinese Cultural Studies, Women’s Studies, and Arts of the Moving Image at Duke University.

出版者:Harvard University Press
作者:Carlos Rojas
出品人:
页数:352
译者:
出版时间:2015-4-6
价格:USD 45.00
装帧:Hardcover
isbn号码:9780674743946
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 罗鹏 
  • 美国 
  • 文学研究 
  • 中国 
  • history 
  • 英文书 
  • 美国移民史 
  • 海外汉学研究 
  •  
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

The collapse of China’s Qing dynasty coincided roughly with discoveries that helped revolutionize views of infectious disease. Together, these parallel developments generated a set of paradigm shifts in the understanding of society, the individual, as well as the cultural matrix that mediates between them. In Homesickness, Carlos Rojas examines an array of Chinese literary and cinematic tropes of illness, arguing that these works approach sickness not solely as a symptom of dysfunction but more importantly as a key to its potential solution.

Rojas focuses on a condition he calls “homesickness”—referring to a discomfort caused not by a longing for home but by an excessive proximity to it. The product of a dialectics of internal alienation and self-differentiation, this inverse homesickness marks a movement away from the “home,” conceived as spaces associated with the nation, the family, and the individual body. The result is a productive dynamism that gives rise to the possibility of long-term health. Without sickness, in other words, there could be no health.

Through a set of detailed analyses of works from China, Greater China, and the global Chinese diaspora—ranging from late-imperial figures such as Liu E and Zeng Pu to contemporary figures such as Yan Lianke and Tsai Ming-liang—Rojas asserts that the very possibility of health is predicated on this condition of homesickness.

具体描述

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

罗鹏对文本的解读,有很多独到的地方,印象最深的是对《老残游记》的分析。但这本书的问题太明显。一是时间跨度长,对各时段的选择和定义,经不起推敲。二是他选择的那些文本,根本支撑不起他对这些时段的判断,也不能代表现代中国的历史脉络,仿佛是凡是自己读过的中国小说和看过的中国电影,全都要揉进书里一样。三是对中国社会和历史缺乏体察,完全是一个局外人雾里看花而又攻击性太强,论述思路简单模式化,总是一根筋批判中国体制和文化。

评分

非常有洞见的medical humanities的书,但是整体框架有点零散~

评分

非常有洞见的medical humanities的书,但是整体框架有点零散~

评分

时间跨度有点夸张,脑洞也有点大。

评分

时间跨度有点夸张,脑洞也有点大。

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有