圖書標籤: 比較政治 曆史社會學 政治經濟學 民主轉型 政治學 Democracy 資本主義 威權主義
发表于2024-12-22
Capitalist Development and Democracy pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024
Product Description
It is a commonplace claim of Western political discourse that capitalist development and democracy go hand in hand. Cross-national statistical research on political democracy supports this claim. By contrast, comparative historical studies carried out within a political economy approach argue that economic development was and is compatible with multiple political forms.
The authors offer a fresh and persuasive resolution to the controversy arising out of these contrasting traditions. Focusing on advanced industrial countries, Latin America, and the Caribbean, they find that the rise and persistence of democracy cannot be explained either by an overall structural correspondence between capitalism and democracy or by the role of the bourgeoisie as the agent of democratic reform. Rather, capitalist development is associated with democracy because it transforms the class structure, enlarging the working and middle classes, facilitating their self-organization, and thus making it more difficult for elites to exclude them. Simultaneously, development weakens the landed upper class, democracy's most consistent opponent.
The relationship of capitalist development to democracy, however, is not mechanical. As the authors show, it depends on a complex interplay of three clusters of power: the balance of power among social classes, power relations between the state and society, and transnational structures of economic and political power. Looking to the future, the book concludes with some reflections on current prospects for the development of stable democracy in Latin America and Eastern Europe.
Dietrich Rueschemeyer is a Brown professor of sociology emeritus and Charles C. Tillinghast Jr. '32 Professor of International Studies emeritus. He currently works on state formation and historical antecedents of socioeconomic development.He was one of the founders of Brown's Center for the Comparative Study of Development, which merged into the Watson Institute. From 1997 to 2002, Professor Rueschemeyer led the Institute's Political Economy and Development Program.
Evelyne Huber & John D. Stephens: http://www.unc.edu/~jdsteph/
比較曆史研究法代錶作之一,內容龐雜。往往被以往學者忽略的國際政治和權力秩序也引入為變量之一,但在拉美等後發民主地區顯得更重要。理論上是社民派和階級分析,認為核心為政治參與擴大的民主製度,最重要推進者是資本主義發展下受壓迫、要求政治權利和經濟福利的工人階級,其政治組織是公民社會的重要組成部分;中産階級推進議會民主和分權製度後未必熱心支持甚至反對工人階級選舉權。拉美案例值得關注,似乎引齣比核心理論更深厚的論述。依附體係下如進口替代戰略如引起農業快速商品化、削弱地主階級,本國工業發展生成工業資産和工人階級,反而是誘緻民主的有利條件;但獨立前未解決的邊境和國傢閤法性問題易引起戰爭和軍事強人當權,導緻官僚威權主義,實是資産階級實現工業現代化的強硬方式。多國即在特殊條件下經曆民主和威權反復更迭崩潰
評分這本書是個綜述,寫得非常繁雜,在兼顧所有比較對象的同時要涵蓋國際經濟秩序、國傢與公民社會的關係,以及公民社會本身的發展情況。但起碼寫得很詳細。兩個觀點值得關注:1、真正推進民主化進程的是工人階級而非中産階級,後者在實現議會民主之後一般都是反對繼續擴大參與麵的。這個論點由三位作者的社會民主取嚮所決定;2、實現穩定的民主轉型的關鍵在於保護精英階層的利益。如果民主化的實現是以絕對剝奪精英階層既得利益為前提的話,往往最終導緻另一種暴政。要注意作用力與反作用力的問題。
評分good summary
評分比較曆史研究法代錶作之一,內容龐雜。往往被以往學者忽略的國際政治和權力秩序也引入為變量之一,但在拉美等後發民主地區顯得更重要。理論上是社民派和階級分析,認為核心為政治參與擴大的民主製度,最重要推進者是資本主義發展下受壓迫、要求政治權利和經濟福利的工人階級,其政治組織是公民社會的重要組成部分;中産階級推進議會民主和分權製度後未必熱心支持甚至反對工人階級選舉權。拉美案例值得關注,似乎引齣比核心理論更深厚的論述。依附體係下如進口替代戰略如引起農業快速商品化、削弱地主階級,本國工業發展生成工業資産和工人階級,反而是誘緻民主的有利條件;但獨立前未解決的邊境和國傢閤法性問題易引起戰爭和軍事強人當權,導緻官僚威權主義,實是資産階級實現工業現代化的強硬方式。多國即在特殊條件下經曆民主和威權反復更迭崩潰
評分the authors try to reconcile the methodological tension between comparative historical studies and quantitative cross-national studies by building up a "new" framework to analyze democratization and using historical studies method to test large-number cases.
評分
評分
評分
評分
Capitalist Development and Democracy pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2024