圖書標籤:  

喜歡 Sitte, Hegemann and the Metropolis 的讀者還喜歡

it really surprised me it could be so many varied(sometimes conflicting) interpretations on Sitte's theory, even after 100 years' appearance and even by such leading contemporary critics and theorists. But what is clear is by now i can completely understand "civic art" is totally different from, what we only have, "urban planning".

it really surprised me it could be so many varied(sometimes conflicting) interpretations on Sitte's theory, even after 100 years' appearance and even by such leading contemporary critics and theorists. But what is clear is by now i can completely understand "civic art" is totally different from, what we only have, "urban planning".

it really surprised me it could be so many varied(sometimes conflicting) interpretations on Sitte's theory, even after 100 years' appearance and even by such leading contemporary critics and theorists. But what is clear is by now i can completely understand "civic art" is totally different from, what we only have, "urban planning".

it really surprised me it could be so many varied(sometimes conflicting) interpretations on Sitte's theory, even after 100 years' appearance and even by such leading contemporary critics and theorists. But what is clear is by now i can completely understand "civic art" is totally different from, what we only have, "urban planning".

it really surprised me it could be so many varied(sometimes conflicting) interpretations on Sitte's theory, even after 100 years' appearance and even by such leading contemporary critics and theorists. But what is clear is by now i can completely understand "civic art" is totally different from, what we only have, "urban planning".