Post-continental Philosophy

Post-continental Philosophy pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025

出版者:Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
作者:John Mullarkey
出品人:
页数:256
译者:
出版时间:2007-2-8
价格:EUR 150.28
装帧:Hardcover
isbn号码:9780826464620
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 哲学 
  • 拉吕埃勒 
  • 德勒兹 
  • 巴迪欧 
  • 后大陆哲学 
  • continental_philosophy 
  •  
想要找书就要到 小美书屋
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

Post-Continental Philosophy outlines the shift in Continental thought over the last 20 years through the work of four central figures: Gilles Deleuze, Alain Badiou, Michel Henry, and Francois Laruelle. Though they follow seemingly different methodologies and agendas, each insists on the need for a return to the category of immanence if philosophy is to have any future at all. Rejecting both the German phenomenological tradition of transcendence (of the Ego, Being, Consciousness, Alterity, or Flesh), as well as the French Structuralist valorisation of Language, they instead take the immanent categories of biology (Deleuze), mathematics (Badiou), affectivity (Henry), and axiomatic science (Laruelle) as focal points for a renewal of thought. Consequently, Continental philosophy is taken in a new direction that engages science and nature with a refreshingly critical and non-reductive approach to life, set-theory, embodiment, and knowledge. However, each of these new philosophies of immanence still regards what the other is doing as transcendent representation, raising the question of what this return to immanence really means. John Mullarkey's analysis provides a startling answer. By teasing out their internal differences, he discovers that the only thing that can be said of immanence without falling back into transcendent representation seems not to be a saying at all but a 'showing', a depiction through lines. Because each of these philosophies also places a special value on the diagram, the common ground of immanence is that occupied by the philosophical diagram rather than the word. The heavily illustrated final chapter of the book literally outlines how a mode of philosophical discourse might proceed when using diagrams to think immanence.

具体描述

读后感

评分

评分

评分

评分

评分

用户评价

评分

前四章的梳理非常平滑,酣畅淋漓,最后一章对哲学图表的讨论稍显奇异。个人觉得Mullarkey对德勒兹的理解要比Galloway深,更期待他写的Laurelle了

评分

前四章的梳理非常平滑,酣畅淋漓,最后一章对哲学图表的讨论稍显奇异。个人觉得Mullarkey对德勒兹的理解要比Galloway深,更期待他写的Laurelle了

评分

前四章的梳理非常平滑,酣畅淋漓,最后一章对哲学图表的讨论稍显奇异。个人觉得Mullarkey对德勒兹的理解要比Galloway深,更期待他写的Laurelle了

评分

前四章的梳理非常平滑,酣畅淋漓,最后一章对哲学图表的讨论稍显奇异。个人觉得Mullarkey对德勒兹的理解要比Galloway深,更期待他写的Laurelle了

评分

前四章的梳理非常平滑,酣畅淋漓,最后一章对哲学图表的讨论稍显奇异。个人觉得Mullarkey对德勒兹的理解要比Galloway深,更期待他写的Laurelle了

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有