This collection of essays shifts the focus of scholarly debate away from the themes that have traditionally dominated the study of Edmund Burke. In the past, largely ideology-based or highly textual studies have tended to paint Burke as a “prophet” or “precursor” of movements as diverse as conservatism, political pragmatism, and romanticism. In contrast, these essays address prominent issues in contemporary society—multiculturalism, the impact of postmodern and relativist methodologies, the boundaries of state-church relationships, and religious tolerance in modern societies—by emphasizing Burke’s earlier career and writings and focusing on his position on historiography, moral philosophy, jurisprudence, aesthetics, and philosophical skepticism.
The essays in this collection, written by some of today’s most renowned Burke scholars, will radically challenge our deeply rooted assumptions about Burke, his thought, and his place in the history of Western political philosophy.
Ian Crowe is a Senior Fellow of the Russell Kirk Center and director of the Edmund Burke Society of America. He is currently an associate professor of History at Brewton-Parker College, Mount Vernon, Georgia, and book review editor of the journal Studies in Burke and His Time.
Ian’s research interest is the career and writings of the eighteenth-century Irish politician and thinker Edmund Burke, regarded by many as the father of modern intellectual conservatism, and a figure whose thought was central to the writings of Russell Kirk. He also writes and lectures on the wider history of the development of British and American conservative thought since the French Revolution. His publications include An Imaginative Whig: Reassessing the Life and Thought of Edmund Burke (2005), The Enduring Edmund Burke (1997), Unwelcome Truths (1997), “The Hereditary Peerage: a Voice in and for Rural Britain” in Another Country, and a number of articles and reviews in Modern Age, The Civil War Book Review, The University Bookman, and Conference and Common Room.
Ian's monograph study of Edmund Burke’s “pre-political” writings, Patriotism and Public Spirit: Edmund Burke and the Role of the Critic in Mid-Eighteenth-Century Britain, is scheduled for publication by Stanford University Press in August 2012. See details at Amazon or the publisher. He is also compiling and editing an anthology of some of Burke’s less familiar works. Provisionally entitled “Edmund Burke and the Politics of Common Sense,” this project is designed to increase awareness of the breadth and diversity of Burke’s thought among students and the wider public.
Ian is concerned to make Burke’s historical and intellectual influence on conservative thought in Europe and the United States recognizable to young scholars, and it was this interest that first brought him to the Russell Kirk Center. His efforts to move Burke studies on from the ideologically driven debates of the Cold War period are also a tribute to the spirit of scholarship in which Russell Kirk, Peter Stanlis, and Francis Canavan invigorated Burke studies and ensured that Burke’s thought would remain vital and accessible to future generations.
Ian studied Modern History at the University of Oxford and earned his Ph.D. in History from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Before moving to Chapel Hill, he and his wife were resident in Mecosta, where he served as program director for the Kirk Center from 2000 to 2002.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这是一次充满意想不到的转折和令人不安的美感的旅程。我首先被它迷人的开篇所吸引——那种带着浓厚地方色彩和强烈个人情感色彩的描述,如同老电影胶片上微微泛黄的色彩,带着一种怀旧的质感,但很快,这种感官上的舒适感就被作者精心设置的智力陷阱所取代。书中对“记忆的不可靠性”这一母题的探讨,达到了一个令人惊叹的深度。它不是简单地陈述记忆是主观的,而是通过一系列错综复杂的人物互动和历史碎片,去展示记忆是如何被建构、被篡改、甚至被用作武器的。我感觉自己就像一个在地下档案室里摸索的侦探,手里拿着的每一份文件都可能是伪造的,而真相则藏在那些被刻意遗忘的角落里。更令人称道的是,作者在处理这些沉重议题时,始终保持着一种优雅的克制,没有落入滥情的陷阱,使得最终的情感爆发更具冲击力和合理性。它成功地让我们相信,理解过去,远比想象中要复杂和危险得多。
评分这部作品,坦率地说,是一次关于人类精神边界的深入探险,它以一种近乎神经质的精确度描绘了那些潜藏在日常表象之下的复杂驱动力。作者似乎拥有一种近乎病态的敏锐,能够捕捉到宏大叙事中的微小裂缝,并从中引申出关于自由意志与宿命论之间永恒拉锯的深刻见解。阅读过程中,我时常感到一种智力上的眩晕,仿佛被卷入了一场由精妙的逻辑迷宫构建的追逐战。它绝非一本可以轻松消遣的读物;相反,它要求读者全身心的投入,去解构那些看似无关紧要的符号和隐喻,最终在作者构建的严密框架中,体验到一种近乎启示录式的顿悟。叙事结构本身就是一种挑战,它拒绝遵循线性的时间逻辑,而是以一种环形或螺旋上升的方式推进,这迫使我们重新审视过去、现在和未来之间的脆弱联系。它成功地将哲学思辨的重量与文学叙事的轻盈完美融合,形成了一种既具有学术深度又不失阅读乐趣的独特文本。我尤其欣赏其中对“瞬间”的捕捉能力,那些短暂的、决定性的时刻,如何像蝴蝶扇动翅膀般,最终引发了不可逆转的巨变。
评分这本书散发着一种古老而又极其现代的气息,仿佛是十八世纪的沙龙辩论与二十一世纪的数字焦虑的奇异混合体。文字的密度极高,每一句话都仿佛经过了无数次的锤炼和打磨,去除了所有不必要的修饰,只留下最核心的、具有穿透力的观点。作者的笔触冷峻而富有洞察力,尤其擅长描绘那些身处权力边缘、却又掌握着微妙杠杆的人物的内心世界。我发现自己不断地停下来,重读某些段落,不仅仅是因为它们的美感,更是因为其中蕴含的社会学观察的锐利性。它迫使我重新审视我们习以为常的社会契约——那些我们从未质疑过的规则和惯例——并以一种近乎异化的视角去看待它们。这种“疏离感”的营造是高明的,它不是为了制造隔阂,而是为了激发批判性思维的火花。全书的节奏感把握得极好,在沉重的思辨之间,总有那么一两处精妙的场景转换或人物对白,如同冰冷钢板上的一道闪光,让人精神为之一振,准备好迎接下一轮的思想冲击。
评分如果说文学作品是思想的容器,那么这部作品简直就是一个结构精巧、内含多层嵌套系统的哲学容器。它的语言风格非常独特,混合了精确的、近乎科学的术语和充满激情、近乎抒情的描绘,这种二元对立非但没有造成冲突,反而形成了一种奇特的张力,使读者在被严谨的论证所吸引的同时,也被其背后的艺术感染力所打动。特别是其中对“时间流逝的感知”的剖析,简直是神来之笔。作者通过一个看似微不足道的日常事件的反复审视,将时间从一个线性的度量工具,转化成了一个具有弹性和多维度的存在。读完后,我感到自己对日常的流逝有了一种全新的敬畏感,仿佛每一个被忽略的下午都蕴含着尚未被发掘的宏大意义。这部书需要耐心,它不迎合快节奏的阅读习惯,它奖励那些愿意放慢脚步,细细品味其中微妙韵律和深层暗示的读者。它无疑是留给那些勇于直面复杂性、并欣赏思想与美学完美结合的读者的宝藏。
评分这部作品的精妙之处在于其对“界限”的不断试探和模糊处理。它在现实与非现实之间架设了一座摇摇晃晃的桥梁,而读者,就是那个必须决定是否冒险穿越的旅行者。作者对人类社会中那些隐秘的等级制度和非正式权力结构的刻画,犀利得令人不寒而栗,他仿佛拥有X光般的视力,能看穿那些精心编织的礼仪和客套话,直达背后的利益交换和权力博弈。我尤其欣赏它在处理“信息不对称”这一现代困境时的手法——它不是生硬地灌输观点,而是通过角色们相互误解、信息被扭曲传递的过程,让读者亲身体验到信息是如何失真并最终塑造行动的。叙事节奏的控制堪称教科书级别,紧张感如同一个逐渐收紧的绞索,但作者总能适时地释放压力,给予短暂的喘息机会,从而使得下一次高潮来临时,效果更加显著。总而言之,这是一部要求读者动用全部智力和情感储备去参与阅读的重量级作品,它提供的不仅仅是一个故事,更是一套审视世界的全新工具。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有