具体描述
C. Fred Alford interviewed working people, prisoners, and college students in order to discover how people experience evil -- in themselves, in others, and in the world. What people meant by evil, he found, was a profound, inchoate feeling of dread so overwhelming that they tried to inflict it on others to be rid of it themselves. A leather-jacketed emergency medical technician, for example, one of the many young people for whom vampires are oddly seductive icons of evil, said he would "give anything to be a vampire".Drawing on psychoanalytic theory, Alford argues that the primary experience of evil is not moral but existential. The problems of evil are complicated by the terror it evokes, a threat to the self so profound it tends to be isolated deep in the mind. Alford suggests an alternative to this bleak vision. The exercise of imagination -- in particular, imagination that takes the form of a shared narrative -- offers an active and practical alternative to the contemporary experience of evil. Our society suffers from a paucity of shared narratives and the creative imagination they inspire.
作者简介
目录信息
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
这本书的文字节奏感把握得极其到位，仿佛每一个句子都有其独特的韵律和呼吸。我发现作者在描述场景和氛围的营造上，有着一种近乎于诗意的天赋。当故事发生在一个宏大的历史背景下时，那种史诗般的厚重感扑面而来，让人仿佛能听到历史的回响；而当笔锋转向到个体的情感纠葛时，文字又变得极其轻柔和富有穿透力，直击人心最柔软的部分。我不得不说，这本书的叙事结构非常巧妙，它不像某些作品那样线性地铺陈故事，而是采用了多线并进的方式，信息碎片化的呈现，反而激发了读者的好奇心和探索欲，让人迫不及待地想将这些散落的线索拼凑起来，还原出完整的图景。这种叙事上的“留白”处理，使得读者成为了故事的共同构建者，而不是被动的接受者，这无疑极大地提升了阅读的参与感和趣味性。每次合上书本，脑海中都会自动浮现出几个令人难忘的画面，它们如同定格的电影镜头，久久不散。
评分我个人对作者在构建世界观上的用心程度感到由衷的敬佩。这个故事发生在一个逻辑自洽且细节丰富的架空体系内，从社会阶层、权力结构到独特的文化习俗，都经过了严密的考量和铺陈。初读时，可能会因为信息的密集而略感吃力，但一旦跨过最初的门槛，那种被彻底接纳进一个全新现实的震撼感是无与伦比的。作者没有急于解释一切，而是通过人物的日常行为和对话自然而然地透露信息，这种“浸入式教学法”非常高明。更值得称道的是，尽管背景宏大，但作者始终没有忘记回归到人性的探讨上。那些复杂的制度和规则，最终都是为了映衬出个体在面对困境时所展现出的复杂人性，这使得这本书既有学术的严谨感，又不失文学的温度和感染力。我甚至会忍不住停下来，去查阅一些相关领域的知识，以更好地理解作者的深层用意。
评分这本书的封面设计简直是一场视觉的盛宴，那种深邃的蓝与隐约浮现的古老符文，立刻抓住了我的眼球。我拿到手的时候，那种沉甸甸的质感，以及散发出的淡淡的墨香，都让人忍不住想要立刻沉浸其中。作者在叙事上的功力着实令人惊叹，仿佛每一个章节的转折都像是精心编排的舞台剧，高潮迭起，让人屏息凝神。我尤其欣赏他对人物心理描摹的细腻之处，那种游走在理性与冲动边缘的挣扎，被刻画得入木三分，让人在阅读的过程中，不时地会产生强烈的代入感，甚至会反思自己过往的某些选择。整体的阅读体验，就像是跟随一位技艺高超的向导，穿越了一条蜿蜒曲折、时而幽暗时而豁然开朗的隧道，虽然过程充满未知和挑战，但最终带给读者的回味和思考，是无可替代的。这本书的排版也很人性化，字号和行间距拿捏得恰到好处，即便是长时间阅读也不会感到疲劳，这对于我这种沉迷书本的人来说，无疑是一个巨大的加分项。
评分从纯粹的审美角度来看，这本书的语言本身就是一种享受。作者的词汇量极其丰富，对不同情境下情绪的捕捉，能够精准地找到最贴切的那个词语，充满了力量感和画面感。阅读过程中，我经常会因为某个句子过于精妙而停下来，默默地在心里赞叹一番。它不像某些作品那样追求华丽的辞藻堆砌，而是讲究“精准的恰到好处”，每一个形容词、每一个动词的选择，都仿佛是经过千锤百炼的匠心之作。这种对语言的敬畏之心，体现在每一个细节中，使得整本书的质感极高。更让我印象深刻的是，作者成功地让叙事声音保持了一种独特的平衡——既有旁观者的客观冷静，又不失对人物命运的深切关怀，使得情感的表达既克制又饱满，富有层次感，让人读后留有余味，久久不能忘怀。
评分这本书给我带来的最强烈的感受是其无可匹敌的“智力挑战性”。它绝非那种可以囫囵吞枣、走马观花地读完的作品。作者似乎非常热衷于在文字中埋藏伏笔和隐喻，每一个看似不经意的对话，都可能指向故事未来的某个关键转折点，或者揭示了某个角色的隐藏动机。我发现自己必须反复阅读某些段落，才能真正领悟其中蕴含的多重含义。这迫使我放慢了阅读速度，真正地去“咀嚼”文字背上的信息量。这种需要高度集中注意力和分析能力的阅读过程，对于那些渴望从书中获得思维锻炼的读者来说，简直是莫大的享受。我甚至买了便利贴，以便标记那些我认为需要深度思考的篇章，这已经超越了一般的休闲阅读范畴，更像是一场与作者智力上的深度对弈。这种层层剥开的惊喜感，是很多畅销书中难以寻觅的。
评分Sadly, I felt a little bit shocked, disappointed and pitiful that philosophy (presumably, as Kord called it) had to borrow methodologies from social science. But it distorted in part the practicability with a philosophical explanation. This approach made the project (at least methodologically) neither fish nor fowl
评分Sadly, I felt a little bit shocked, disappointed and pitiful that philosophy (presumably, as Kord called it) had to borrow methodologies from social science. But it distorted in part the practicability with a philosophical explanation. This approach made the project (at least methodologically) neither fish nor fowl
评分Sadly, I felt a little bit shocked, disappointed and pitiful that philosophy (presumably, as Kord called it) had to borrow methodologies from social science. But it distorted in part the practicability with a philosophical explanation. This approach made the project (at least methodologically) neither fish nor fowl
评分Sadly, I felt a little bit shocked, disappointed and pitiful that philosophy (presumably, as Kord called it) had to borrow methodologies from social science. But it distorted in part the practicability with a philosophical explanation. This approach made the project (at least methodologically) neither fish nor fowl
评分Sadly, I felt a little bit shocked, disappointed and pitiful that philosophy (presumably, as Kord called it) had to borrow methodologies from social science. But it distorted in part the practicability with a philosophical explanation. This approach made the project (at least methodologically) neither fish nor fowl
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有