The myth of the peace-loving "noble savage" is persistent and pernicious. Indeed, for the last fifty years, most popular and scholarly works have agreed that prehistoric warfare was rare, harmless, unimportant, and, like smallpox, a disease of civilized societies alone. Prehistoric warfare, according to this view, was little more than a ritualized game, where casualties were limited and the effects of aggression relatively mild. Lawrence Keeley's groundbreaking War Before Civilization offers a devastating rebuttal to such comfortable myths and debunks the notion that warfare was introduced to primitive societies through contact with civilization (an idea he denounces as "the pacification of the past"). Building on much fascinating archeological and historical research and offering an astute comparison of warfare in civilized and prehistoric societies, from modern European states to the Plains Indians of North America, War Before Civilization convincingly demonstrates that prehistoric warfare was in fact more deadly, more frequent, and more ruthless than modern war. To support this point, Keeley provides a wide-ranging look at warfare and brutality in the prehistoric world. He reveals, for instance, that prehistorical tactics favoring raids and ambushes, as opposed to formal battles, often yielded a high death-rate; that adult males falling into the hands of their enemies were almost universally killed; and that surprise raids seldom spared even women and children. Keeley cites evidence of ancient massacres in many areas of the world, including the discovery in South Dakota of a prehistoric mass grave containing the remains of over 500 scalped and mutilated men, women, and children (a slaughter that took place a century and a half before the arrival of Columbus). In addition, Keeley surveys the prevalence of looting, destruction, and trophy-taking in all kinds of warfare and again finds little moral distinction between ancient warriors and civilized armies. Finally, and perhaps most controversially, he examines the evidence of cannibalism among some preliterate peoples. Keeley is a seasoned writer and his book is packed with vivid, eye-opening details (for instance, that the homicide rate of prehistoric Illinois villagers may have exceeded that of the modern United States by some 70 times). But he also goes beyond grisly facts to address the larger moral and philosophical issues raised by his work. What are the causes of war? Are human beings inherently violent? How can we ensure peace in our own time? Challenging some of our most dearly held beliefs, Keeley's conclusions are bound to stir controversy.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书的语言风格极其凝练,充满了散文诗般的张力和一种近乎冷酷的学术精确性。它绝非那种易于消化的通俗读物,更像是一块需要反复咀嚼的矿石,每一次品味都能从中发现新的矿物结晶。作者在构建论点时,那种步步为营、层层递进的逻辑链条,简直是教科书级别的示范。他巧妙地将人类学、考古学以及早期社会心理学的发现熔铸在一起,形成了一个坚不可摧的论证框架。我尤其被书中对特定工具制造工艺和定居模式演变的细致描摹所吸引,这些细节看似微不足道,却构成了理解大规模社会动荡的基石。整本书读完后,脑海中留下的不是一堆孤立的事实,而是一幅连贯的、充满张力的早期人类生存图景,那种震撼是长久而深刻的。
评分这本书的叙事方式着实令人耳目一新,它没有采用那种宏大叙事或线性时间推进的传统史学写法,而是像一位老练的侦探,从那些被历史烟尘掩盖的角落里,小心翼翼地抽丝剥茧。作者仿佛拥有某种超凡的洞察力,能够穿透时间的迷雾,直抵那些人类冲突的原始内核。我特别欣赏它对“文明”定义的解构,它挑战了我们习以为常的进步史观,暗示了某种更为复杂、甚至可能带着悲剧色彩的起源故事。读起来,仿佛不是在阅读历史,而是在参与一场深刻的哲学思辨,关于我们如何定义自身,以及这种定义背后的脆弱性。那种对人类本性中暴力与协作之间微妙平衡的探讨,令人深思良久,尤其是在描述早期社会结构如何应对资源稀缺时的那种冷静而近乎无情的分析,展现了作者深厚的跨学科功底。
评分这本书的语气和态度,充满了对人类历史进程的某种近乎悲悯的冷静观察。它很少带有强烈的情感色彩或道德评判,而是像一台高精度的仪器,忠实地记录和分析着数据。作者在探讨社会凝聚力的形成与瓦解时,所引用的考古学证据之扎实,令人信服。特别是关于早期仪式行为在维护群体认同方面的作用的论述,提供了一个非常新鲜的视角。它没有粉饰早期人类的生存环境,也没有夸大“野蛮”的程度,只是极其客观地展示了生存的艰辛与智慧。这本书的阅读过程,与其说是学习知识,不如说是一种认知上的“脱敏”过程,它让你习惯于直面历史的复杂性,而不是期待一个简单的、英雄主义的叙事。
评分坦白说,这本书的阅读体验有些像在攀登一座陡峭的山峰,初读时可能会因为其密集的专业术语和不甚友好的行文节奏而感到气馁。然而,一旦你适应了作者设定的节奏,并开始理解其内在的韵律,那种成就感是无与伦比的。它迫使你走出舒适区,去审视那些我们习惯于视为“自然”或“理所当然”的人类行为模式,并对其进行根本性的质疑。书中对早期贸易路线和跨地域交流网络的构建分析,展现了一种宏大的世界观,揭示了在农业革命之前,人类社会就已经存在着复杂的相互依赖关系。那些关于权力早期形态的论述,非常具有颠覆性,它没有给我们一个简单的答案,反而将我们引向了更多亟待探索的迷宫。
评分这本书的结构设计堪称鬼斧神工,它不像传统著作那样按时间轴推进,而是采取了一种主题式、放射性的展开方式,每一次深入一个主题,都能看到它与其他主题之间错综复杂的联结。作者似乎对“悖论”情有独钟,不断地将看似矛盾的现象并置,然后用其独特的理论体系去调和或解释它们。例如,他对早期社群中出现的极端利他行为与同时期存在的系统性排斥现象的对比分析,就极其精彩。这本书的价值不在于提供一个终极的“为什么”,而在于提供了一套极其犀利的“如何观察”的工具。读完之后,我感觉自己对当今世界的许多冲突和不公,都有了一种更加溯源的、更具批判性的视角去审视。
评分有意与无意粉饰和平对于科学研究追求真理而言都是没有意义的
评分有意与无意粉饰和平对于科学研究追求真理而言都是没有意义的
评分有意与无意粉饰和平对于科学研究追求真理而言都是没有意义的
评分有意与无意粉饰和平对于科学研究追求真理而言都是没有意义的
评分有意与无意粉饰和平对于科学研究追求真理而言都是没有意义的
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有