Thanks to the pioneering tours of the Creole Band, jazz began to be heard nationwide on the vaudeville stages of America from 1914 to 1918. This seven-piece band toured the country, exporting for the first time the authentic jazz strains that had developed in New Orleans at the start of the 20th century. The band's vaudeville routines were deeply rooted in the minstrel shows and plantation cliches of American show business in the late 19th century, but its instrumental music was central to its performance and distinctive and entrancing to audiences and reviewers.
Pioneers of Jazz reveals at long last the link between New Orleans music and the jazz phenomenon that swept America in the 1920s. While they were the first important band from New Orleans to attain national exposure, The Creole Band has not heretofore been recognized for its unique importance. But in his monumental, careful research, jazz scholar Lawrence Gushee firmly establishes the group's central role in jazz history.
Gushee traces the troupe's activities and quotes the reaction of critics and audiences to their first encounters with this new musical phenomenon. While audiences often expected (and got) a kind of minstrel show, the group transcended expectations, taking pride in their music and facing down the theatrical establishment with courage. Although they played the West Coast and Canada, most of their touring centered in the heartland. Most towns of any size in Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana heard them, often repeatedly, and virtually all of their appearances were received with wild enthusiasm. After four years of nearly incessant traveling, members of the band founded or joined groups in Chicago's South Side cabaret scene, igniting the craze for hot New Orleans music for which the Windy City was renowned in the early 1920s. The best-known musicians in the group--cornetist Freddie Keppard, clarinetist Jimmy Noone and string bassist Bill Johnson--would play a significant role in jazz, becoming famous for recordings in the 1920s. Gushee effectively brings to life each member of the band and discusses their individual contributions, while analyzing the music with precision, skillful and exacting documentation. Including many never before published photos and interviews, the book also provides an invaluable and colorful look at show business, especially vaudeville, in the 1910s.
While some of the first jazz historians were aware of the band's importance, attempts to locate and interview surviving members (three died before 1935) were sporadic and did little or nothing to correct the mostly erroneous accounts of the band's career. The jazz world has long known about Gushee's original work on this previously neglected subject, and the book represents an important event in jazz scholarship. Pioneers of Jazz brilliantly places this group's unique importance into a broad cultural and historical context, and provides the crucial link between jazz's origins in New Orleans and the beginning of its dissemination across the country.
评分
评分
评分
评分
我必须承认,这本书的语言本身是华丽的,充满了各种比喻和富有画面感的词汇,这可能是它最大的卖点之一。作者擅长用诗意的语言来描绘音乐的“感觉”。然而,对于一个追求知识精确性的读者而言,这种过度依赖“感觉”的描述最终会让人感到空洞。比如,描述一位小号手的即兴段落,书中写道:“他的音符如同挣脱了地心引力的彗星,划破了夜晚的穹顶,带着无尽的渴望与对自由的狂热呐喊。”这听起来很美,但问题是,这个“彗星”的轨迹是什么?它是在五度圈上旋转,还是在小调音阶上进行三度跳跃?书中完全没有提供任何可以作为“坐标”的音乐术语来锚定这种美感。这种“知其然而不知其所以然”的写作方式,让我感到自己像一个被蒙住眼睛的听众,只能被动地接受作者灌输的赞美,却无法真正掌握音乐的“语法”。我原以为这是一本能教会我如何“听懂”爵士乐发展脉络的工具书,结果它更像是一本精装的赞美诗集,赞美那些开创了历史的人,却不愿或不能揭示他们是如何用音符写下历史的。最终的感受是,我记住了许多名字和酒馆的地址,但对爵士乐作为一门复杂艺术形式的理解,并没有得到实质性的提升。
评分我本来期待这本书能像一本精心策划的“音乐考古”报告,把那些失传的、被遗忘的早期录音片段的背景故事挖掘出来,让那些被主流历史淹没的边缘人物重见天日。这本书确实提到了几位名字很陌生的乐手,这方面做得尚可,为我打开了几扇新世界的大门。然而,一旦进入他们各自的章节,叙事立刻又回到了老生常谈的叙事轨道上。作者似乎对“被遗忘者”的挖掘热情仅限于发现他们存在过,而非深入探究他们究竟贡献了什么独特的声音。我特别关注到书中对于新奥尔良“军乐队”向“小型合奏团”转变那一时期的描述,这被认为是爵士乐走向成熟的关键一步。书中只是轻描淡写地提到乐器配置的变化,比如“大号让位给了低音提琴”,但这背后的声学和节奏动力学上的根本性转变,却完全被忽略了。我需要了解的是,当低音提琴进入时,它如何改变了低音线的支撑方式,以及这如何解放了其他声部的即兴空间。这种对“如何发生”的避而不谈,使得整本书的论述停留在现象描述层面,无法上升到对音乐史的深刻洞察。说实话,阅读体验下来,感觉像是看了一部制作精良的纪录片,但每一处关键的理论阐释都被跳过了,只留下了光鲜亮丽的镜头。
评分坦白说,这本书的行文风格简直像是一篇被拉长了的学术研讨会记录,充满了冗余的、自我重复的论断。每当作者试图提出一个关于“爵士乐早期如何打破白人音乐体系的桎梏”的核心观点时,他总会用三到四种不同的方式来阐述同一个意思,仿佛担心读者会遗漏哪怕是最细微的语意差别。这种写作手法极大地损害了阅读的流畅性,我不得不频繁地停下来,试图分辨哪里是新的论据,哪里只是对前一段话的换个说法。更令人沮丧的是,书中对关键技术术语的使用显得非常含糊。例如,当讨论到早期的“布鲁斯和声”向“摇摆乐”过渡时,书中只是泛泛而谈“节奏变得更自由”、“和弦色彩更丰富了”,却没有给出任何可以量化的、可以被音乐家验证的例子。我简直想拿起笔在页边空白处写下:“具体是哪个和弦替换了哪个?摇摆乐的切分音是如何精确地嵌入到4/4拍中的?”书中没有附带任何乐谱示例或音频参考,这对于任何想要深入了解音乐内部机制的读者来说,都是致命的缺陷。我感觉作者似乎更偏爱文学性的描摹,而非严谨的音乐学分析。读完后我唯一的收获是,我知道了早期许多爵士音乐家都非常贫穷,但这对我理解“先锋”的音乐实践价值,几乎没有提供任何实质性的帮助。这本书读起来就像是隔着一层厚厚的毛玻璃在看一场精彩的演出,能看到光影,却看不清演员的每一个细微的动作和表情。
评分这本书的排版和装帧设计,与其说是献给严肃的爵士乐爱好者,不如说是为咖啡馆里的休闲读者准备的读物。字体选择偏大,行距宽松,大量的留白让整本书看起来很“轻松”,但这种“轻松”是以内容的密度为代价的。我几乎是用两倍的时间才读完它,不是因为内容晦涩,而是因为作者似乎在刻意地拉长篇幅来填充页数。比如,关于某位钢琴家对“切分节奏”的早期探索,书中用了整整两页的篇幅去描述他在一个炎热夏夜如何艰难地找到了一个可以练习的阁楼,以及他的手被汗水浸湿后粘在琴键上的感受。这种感官描述的堆砌,对于提升我对“切分节奏”理解的帮助几乎为零。我渴望的是对这种节奏突破的内化和分析,是体会它如何挑战了听众对规律的预期。此外,本书对美国社会背景的融入处理得非常生硬。当需要提及种族隔离或禁酒令的影响时,作者会突然插入一小段与主题关联不大的社会历史背景,然后又迅速跳回对某个乐手日常的流水账描述,缺乏将音乐的先锋性与社会结构性矛盾紧密结合的深度分析。这使得这本书更像是一部松散的“早期音乐家群像集”,而不是一部聚焦于“先锋精神”的批判性著作。
评分这本书的封面设计着实抓人眼球,那种复古的油画质感,仿佛能透过纸张闻到旧时代乐器散发出的木质香气。我一开始抱着极大的期望翻开它,希望能沉浸在一场跨越世纪的爵士乐盛宴中。然而,读完前三分之一,我开始感到一丝困惑。作者似乎花费了过多的笔墨去描绘早期音乐家们的生活琐事,比如他们在哪条街的哪个角落买的第一个萨克斯风,或者某次演出后在小酒馆里喝了什么牌子的威士忌。这些细节固然提供了生活的肌理感,但对于一个渴望了解“先锋”精神如何具体体现在音乐创新上的读者来说,显得有些失焦。我期待的是对和声结构演变、即兴手法的革命性突破的深入剖析,是关于那些定义了“爵士乐起源”的里程碑式作品的详尽乐理解析。比如,当提到路易斯·阿姆斯特朗的“Satchmo时代”,我更想知道他的小号是如何打破了传统独奏的框架,如何运用滑音和颤音创造出前所未有的音色张力,而不是过多地描述他当时穿着的西装颜色或者与哪位女歌手的绯闻。整本书的叙事节奏略显拖沓,像一条在沼泽地里缓慢移动的河流,虽然水面平静,但底下的暗流和磅礴的力量感却被轻描淡写地带过了。这让我不禁怀疑,作者的重点究竟是在记录历史人物的传记花边,还是在严肃地梳理一种音乐流派的演进脉络。我希望接下来的章节能有所转变,否则这本书更像是一本精致的历史八卦集,而非我所期望的音乐史诗。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有