Breakthroughs in genetics present us with a promise and a predicament. The promise is that we will soon be able to treat and prevent a host of debilitating diseases. The predicament is that our newfound genetic knowledge may enable us to manipulate our nature--to enhance our genetic traits and those of our children. Although most people find at least some forms of genetic engineering disquieting, it is not easy to articulate why. What is wrong with re-engineering our nature?
The Case against Perfection explores these and other moral quandaries connected with the quest to perfect ourselves and our children. Michael Sandel argues that the pursuit of perfection is flawed for reasons that go beyond safety and fairness. The drive to enhance human nature through genetic technologies is objectionable because it represents a bid for mastery and dominion that fails to appreciate the gifted character of human powers and achievements. Carrying us beyond familiar terms of political discourse, this book contends that the genetic revolution will change the way philosophers discuss ethics and will force spiritual questions back onto the political agenda.
In order to grapple with the ethics of enhancement, we need to confront questions largely lost from view in the modern world. Since these questions verge on theology, modern philosophers and political theorists tend to shrink from them. But our new powers of biotechnology make these questions unavoidable. Addressing them is the task of this book, by one of America's preeminent moral and political thinkers.
Michael J. Sandel is the Anne T. and Robert M. Bass Professor of Government at Harvard University, where he has taught political philosophy since 1980. He is the author of Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge University Press, 1982, 2nd edition, 1997; translated into eight foreign languages), Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy (Harvard University Press, 1996), Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics (Harvard University Press, 2005), and The Case against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering (Harvard University Press, 2007). His writings also appear in general publications such as The Atlantic Monthly, The New Republic, and The New York Times. Sandel teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in contemporary political philosophy, including "Ethics, Biotechnology, and the Future of Human Nature," "Markets, Morals, and Law," and "Globalization and Its Critics." His undergraduate course, "Justice," has enrolled over 12,000 students. In 1985, he was awarded the Harvard-Radcliffe Phi Beta Kappa Teaching Prize, and in 1999 was named a Harvard College Professor in recognition of his contributions to undergraduate teaching.
Sandel has lectured to academic and general audiences in North America, Europe, Japan, India, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, and China. He was a visiting professor at the Sorbonne (Paris) in 2001, and delivered the Tanner Lectures on Human Values at Oxford University in 1998. The recipient of three honorary degrees, he has received fellowships from the Carnegie Corporation, the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Ford Foundation, and the American Council of Learned Societies. From 2002 to 2005, he served on the President's Council on Bioethics, a national council appointed by the President to examine the ethical implications of new biomedical technologies. A summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Brandeis University (1975), Sandel received his doctorate from Oxford University (D.Phil.,1981), where he was a Rhodes Scholar. He lives with his wife and two sons in Brookline, Massachusetts.
看过Prof. Sandel的Justice公开课,也看过书。他的教学态度从容,思维缜密,上课很少背书讲理论,基本上都是通过问题与讨论一步步推进对道德难题的思考。所以来看《反对完美》也算是一种追星吧(并不是。 本书讨论人类是否应通过基因改良追求完美。这实在是一个难题,因为当人...
评分一直追溯自身起源的我们,却从来不甘于人类自身的局限性。 桑德尔对基因编辑这个命题,罗列并提出了诸多观点,其中的核心思想是: 1.在整体上看,基因编辑违背运动精神,人生这场竞赛从刚开始被剥夺了与他人之间的“公平”和自身的平等性存在,但公平竞争中合理的手段很难界定...
评分对桑德尔不了解的读者朋友,亦可从此书入手反思到很多,同时也反照他的思想,得到关于道德隐忧与伦理困境的共感。 赵汀阳先生的导论“完美是最好的吗”写的非常不错,直接点明这是桑先生从科学技术(基因)改善人自身之自然性质的问题入手,尝试去处理关于未来的理解。然而...
评分最悲哀的莫过于随着年龄的增长而变得保守,为可以对问题进行回答而沾沾自喜,为自己少得可怜的一点知识而自鸣得意。 本文灵感来自一篇小文章,罗伯特·林德的《无知的乐趣》。 无知的乐趣 摘录其中片段开始今天的文字。 如果说人们似乎已经无所不知,那也只是因为我们几乎一无...
2019ver
评分2019ver
评分2019ver
评分2019ver
评分2019ver
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有