How Things Shape the Mind pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Lambros Malafouris is Johnson Research Fellow in Creativity, Cognition, and Material Culture at Keble College and the Institute of Archaeology, University of Oxford.

出版者:The MIT Press

作者:Lambros Malafouris

出品人:

頁數:304

译者:

出版時間:2013-7-12

價格:USD 40.00

裝幀:Hardcover

isbn號碼:9780262019194

叢書系列:

圖書標籤:

物質文化的能動性
身體醫療史
認知科學哲學
認知科學
具身認知
倫福儒
x18
material_agency

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到小美書屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

An account of the different ways in which things have become cognitive extensions of the human body, from prehistory to the present.

An increasingly influential school of thought in cognitive science views the mind as embodied, extended, and distributed rather than brain-bound or "all in the head." This shift in perspective raises important questions about the relationship between cognition and material culture, posing major challenges for philosophy, cognitive science, archaeology, and anthropology. In How Things Shape the Mind, Lambros Malafouris proposes a cross-disciplinary analytical framework for investigating the ways in which things have become cognitive extensions of the human body. Using a variety of examples and case studies, he considers how those ways might have changed from earliest prehistory to the present. Malafouris's Material Engagement Theory definitively adds materiality -- the world of things, artifacts, and material signs -- into the cognitive equation. His account not only questions conventional intuitions about the boundaries and location of the human mind but also suggests that we rethink classical archaeological assumptions about human cognitive evolution.

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

用戶評價

评分☆☆☆☆☆

好吧，物質文化的能動研究，如果這種研究能夠被國人認可我就醉瞭

评分☆☆☆☆☆

作者試圖以一種考古學、人類學、認知神經科學和心靈哲學的綜閤視角討論物質如何形塑心靈（mind），三個核心觀點：the extended mind, the enactive sigh, material agency。文中列舉的認知科學的例子不可謂沒有啓發性，但全書結論的得齣似乎可以獨立於這些例子，甚至作為概念框架基礎的心靈哲學也隻起到瞭簡單的腳手架作用，並沒有為論證的過程提供有力的支撐。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

好吧，物質文化的能動研究，如果這種研究能夠被國人認可我就醉瞭

评分☆☆☆☆☆