 
			 
				The Great Recession has prompted a reassessment of the specific mode of capitalist accumulation that achieved dominance in the era of globalization. Yet just about all of this literature has focused on one of two issues: why things went wrong, and what we need to do in order to return the system to stability. Outside of a contingent of radical socialists on the fringes of the debate, virtually no one questioned whether capitalism could continue. In Does Capitalism Have a Future?, the prominent theorist Georgi Derleugian has gathered together a quintet of eminent macrosociologists to assess whether the capitalist system can survive.
The prevalent common wisdom, for all its current gloom, nevertheless safely assumes that capitalism cannot break down permanently because there is no alternative. The authors shatter this assumption, arguing that this generalization is not supported by theory but is rather an outgrowth of the optimistic nineteenth-century claim that human history ascends through stages to an enlightened equilibrium of liberal capitalism. Yet as they point out, just about all major historical systems have broken down in the end (e.g., the Roman empire). In the modern epoch there have been several cataclysmic events-notably the French revolution, World War I, and the collapse of the Soviet bloc-that came to pass mainly because contemporary political elites had spectacularly failed to calculate the consequences of the processes they presumed to govern. At present, none of our governing elites and very few of our intellectuals can fathom an ending to our current reigning system. Considering whether a collapse is possible is the task that the quintet-Derleugian, Michael Mann, Randall Collins, Craig Calhoun, and Immanuel Wallerstein-sets out to explore. While all of the contributors arrive at different conclusions, they are in constant dialogue with each other and therefore able to construct relatively seamless-if open-ended-whole. For instance, Wallerstein (who accurately predicted the collapse of the Soviet system in 1979) and Collins, identify fatal structural faults in twenty-first century capitalism. Mann, on the other hand, does not think that there is any serious alternative to the market dynamic, but he does identify other serious threats to the system, including environmental degradation. Calhoun and Derluguian are more circumspect and focus on the role of politics in steering the system toward either revival or collapse.
This most ambitious of books, written by the highest caliber of sociologists, asks the biggest of questions: are we on the cusp of a radical world historical shift or not?
Immanuel Wallerstein is Senior Research Scholar at Yale and founder of the Fernand Braudel Center at Binghamton University.
Randall Collins is Dorothy Swaine Thomas Professor of Sociology University of Pennsylvania and former President of American Sociological Association.
Michael Mann teaches sociology at UCLA.
Georgi Derluguian teaches Social Research and Public Policy at New York University Abu Dhabi.
Craig Calhoun is Director of the London School of Economics.
带着课堂提问翻开此书,虽未能解决课程问题,但五位学者的论述还是给政治学小白带来不少启发。认为“资本主义崩溃”的两名学者或将资本主义视为系统,以利润的挤压出发讨论其崩溃过程,或以“技术”为切入点,探讨技术冲击下新工种或就业机会的增长率低于人力被代替率,最终导...
評分假先知无数次发声,他们的预言没有未来! 简单地说,资本主义的左派学者基本上是生活在资本主义文明的蜜罐中幻想着为资本主义掘墓的那一类人。他们有一个共同的致命之处:就是服从于某种虚假的“良心”(就是认定学者必须反对政府以及代表着政府的主流意识形态),为反对而反...
評分根据资本主义世界一次一次爆发的经济危机,资本主义的现状与未来成为一个焦点话题。作者汇集各家的观点及历史事件做出宏观研究,对未来可能的大变化引发众人的思考。在我内心还是比较喜欢求同存异,只有多元才能丰富!
評分本书由沃勒斯坦、迈克尔-曼等人合著。2008年全球金融危机爆发以来,资本主义的现状与未来成为全球各界最为关注的话题。本书五位作者从历史社会学的视角切入问题,考察宏观的结构性因素和趋势,时间跨度从几十年到几百年,从过往帝国的兴衰过程中总结经验,通过分析资本主义体系...
評分關於“資本主義”,已有眾多經濟學傢、社會學傢曾經對於它的未來進行分析,福山曾經說過資本主義社會是人類曆史的終結,馬剋思和熊彼特曾經從不同角度論證它必將被社會主義所代替,約翰.羅默 曾經寫過《社會主義的未來》,本書的幾位作者作為社會學傢也給齣瞭自己的闡述,本書已經有中譯版
评分關於“資本主義”,已有眾多經濟學傢、社會學傢曾經對於它的未來進行分析,福山曾經說過資本主義社會是人類曆史的終結,馬剋思和熊彼特曾經從不同角度論證它必將被社會主義所代替,約翰.羅默 曾經寫過《社會主義的未來》,本書的幾位作者作為社會學傢也給齣瞭自己的闡述,本書已經有中譯版
评分關於“資本主義”,已有眾多經濟學傢、社會學傢曾經對於它的未來進行分析,福山曾經說過資本主義社會是人類曆史的終結,馬剋思和熊彼特曾經從不同角度論證它必將被社會主義所代替,約翰.羅默 曾經寫過《社會主義的未來》,本書的幾位作者作為社會學傢也給齣瞭自己的闡述,本書已經有中譯版
评分關於“資本主義”,已有眾多經濟學傢、社會學傢曾經對於它的未來進行分析,福山曾經說過資本主義社會是人類曆史的終結,馬剋思和熊彼特曾經從不同角度論證它必將被社會主義所代替,約翰.羅默 曾經寫過《社會主義的未來》,本書的幾位作者作為社會學傢也給齣瞭自己的闡述,本書已經有中譯版
评分關於“資本主義”,已有眾多經濟學傢、社會學傢曾經對於它的未來進行分析,福山曾經說過資本主義社會是人類曆史的終結,馬剋思和熊彼特曾經從不同角度論證它必將被社會主義所代替,約翰.羅默 曾經寫過《社會主義的未來》,本書的幾位作者作為社會學傢也給齣瞭自己的闡述,本書已經有中譯版
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有