图书标签: 认知科学 科普 哲学 Michael_Tomasello 认知 CS 美國 知识论
发表于2024-11-25
A Natural History of Human Thinking pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
Tool-making or culture, language or religious belief: ever since Darwin, thinkers have struggled to identify what fundamentally differentiates human beings from other animals. In this much-anticipated book, Michael Tomasello weaves his twenty years of comparative studies of humans and great apes into a compelling argument that cooperative social interaction is the key to our cognitive uniqueness. Once our ancestors learned to put their heads together with others to pursue shared goals, humankind was on an evolutionary path all its own.
Tomasello argues that our prehuman ancestors, like today’s great apes, were social beings who could solve problems by thinking. But they were almost entirely competitive, aiming only at their individual goals. As ecological changes forced them into more cooperative living arrangements, early humans had to coordinate their actions and communicate their thoughts with collaborative partners. Tomasello’s “shared intentionality hypothesis” captures how these more socially complex forms of life led to more conceptually complex forms of thinking. In order to survive, humans had to learn to see the world from multiple social perspectives, to draw socially recursive inferences, and to monitor their own thinking via the normative standards of the group. Even language and culture arose from the preexisting need to work together. What differentiates us most from other great apes, Tomasello proposes, are the new forms of thinking engendered by our new forms of collaborative and communicative interaction.
A Natural History of Human Thinking is the most detailed scientific analysis to date of the connection between human sociality and cognition.
迈克尔.托马塞洛(Michael Tomasello)
美国发展与比较心理学家。德国马克普朗克进化人类学研究院联合院长,德国莱比锡大学心理学系荣誉教授,美国杜克大学名誉教授。
从20世纪90年代起,多项学术大奖荣誉加身,被公认为当代最权威的发展与比较心理学家,是世界范围内少数被多学科领域认可的学术权威之一。他关于社会认知起源的先锋性研究,开启了发展心理学与灵长类认知研究的独特视角。
所获荣誉(部分):
· 2003年入选德国国家科学院(German National Academy of Sciences)
· 2006年荣获被誉为心灵哲学诺贝尔奖的法国让-尼科奖(Jean Nicod Prize)
· 2010年入选匈牙利国家科学院(Hungarian National Academy of Sciences)
· 2015年荣获美国心理协会杰出科学贡献大奖
· 2017年入选美国艺术与科学院(American Academy of Arts & Sciences)
· 2017年入选美国国家科学院(National Academy of Sciences)
译者 苏彦捷
北京大学心理学系导师、教授,北京大学元培学院副院长。以发展心理学、生物心理学为研究方向,参编多本教材,译著如《发展心理学》、《女性心理学》、《环境心理学》、《生理心理学》、《心理学与人生》。
Does culture or language make humans unique? Yes and no. They are symptoms of a cognitive evolution dated far earlier: the joint intentionality and joint attention when early humans were forced to cooperate (foraging) to survive.
评分Does culture or language make humans unique? Yes and no. They are symptoms of a cognitive evolution dated far earlier: the joint intentionality and joint attention when early humans were forced to cooperate (foraging) to survive.
评分Does culture or language make humans unique? Yes and no. They are symptoms of a cognitive evolution dated far earlier: the joint intentionality and joint attention when early humans were forced to cooperate (foraging) to survive.
评分Does culture or language make humans unique? Yes and no. They are symptoms of a cognitive evolution dated far earlier: the joint intentionality and joint attention when early humans were forced to cooperate (foraging) to survive.
评分Does culture or language make humans unique? Yes and no. They are symptoms of a cognitive evolution dated far earlier: the joint intentionality and joint attention when early humans were forced to cooperate (foraging) to survive.
原著相信很好,不过翻译实在可以。短短一个序言,就有好几处不明所以和语法错误: “而与之密切相连的人类活动虽然从表面上看充满了个体主义色彩,但背后社会关系、文化习俗、规范和制度在其间扮演的角色决定了这仅仅是一种可能。” 有国文好的朋友麻烦告诉我这句话到底是什么...
评分在《人类认知的文化起源》里面,托马塞洛认为“动物和人的差别只有一个,就是人对自己的同类有更深刻的认同。只有人类才能把同类理解为跟自己一样的有意向的行动者,从而进行文化学习”。随着十多年来对类人猿的研究,托马塞洛认为类人猿似乎也能把其它类人猿个体当做具有意图...
评分全书较为学术严谨的介绍了human thinking(我倾向于翻译成“人类思考”,以区别与中文版翻译“人类思维”。一来强调thinking的动态过程;二来中文思维会有诸如观点、模型、方法论等的介入,但thinking不强调这一点。)的发展。这个发展可以是human thinking的历史发展,也可以...
评分全书较为学术严谨的介绍了human thinking(我倾向于翻译成“人类思考”,以区别与中文版翻译“人类思维”。一来强调thinking的动态过程;二来中文思维会有诸如观点、模型、方法论等的介入,但thinking不强调这一点。)的发展。这个发展可以是human thinking的历史发展,也可以...
评分如有能力,请看英文版。因为这本书的翻译实在是差到了令人发指的地步。 1.核心术语译法问题 本书最核心的术语,就是“intentionality”。这个词,稍微懂点心灵哲学的人应该都很面熟,知道这个词国内统一译法就是“意向性”。而这本书给翻成了“意图性”。 “亲自挂名”的译者苏...
A Natural History of Human Thinking pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024