图书标签: 历史 印度 subalternstudies Guha_Ranajit 长知识的书 社会学/人类学(经验研究) 教科書 外国研究
发表于2024-11-22
Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
This classic work in subaltern studies explores the common elements present in rebel consciousness during the Indian colonial period. Ranajit Guha—intellectual founder of the groundbreaking and influential Subaltern Studies Group—describes from the peasants’ viewpoint the relations of dominance and subordination in rural India from 1783 to 1900.
Challenging the idea that peasants were powerless agents who rebelled blindly against British imperialist oppression and local landlord exploitation, Guha emphasizes their awareness and will to effect political change. He suggests that the rebellions represented the birth of a theoretical consciousness and asserts that India’s long subaltern tradition lent power to the landmark insurgence led by Mahatma Gandhi. Yet as long as landlord authority remains dominant in a ruling culture, Guha claims, all mass struggles will tend to model themselves after the unfinished projects documented in this book.
Students and scholars will welcome this paperback edition of Guha’s 1983 original, which was distributed on a limited scale in the United States. It will influence new generations studying colonialism, postcolonialism, subaltern studies, historiography, anthropology, and Indian, Asian, and Latin American history.
A typically Marxian historical work. The chapter on transmission reveals the role of rumour and other verbal and non-verbal media of knowledge in the structure of insurgency and is very much suggestive to me as a student of material culture. Yet the problem of historical source still appears to me a barrier to the understanding of what and how the
评分核心观点是农民起义背后有自己的一套心理机制、价值观、思想和结构。从英国法国印度中国(主要是《湖南农民运动考察报告》)关于农民起义的史料里挖掘能充实农民起义的基本面(“否定”、“模糊性”、“形式”、“扩散”和“区域性”)的论据。不是很喜欢这种使用史料的方法,生生掰开再放到不同的名目下,生硬了些。对印度史不熟悉,跳过了不少。
评分暂时只读了intro,二十世纪是农民革命的世纪,这本书尤其反对对这些运动的精英化理解(农民需要外部的“领袖”不然会没方向/做过头,或者农民革命是更大的民族/社会主义革命的一部分),尝试解释殖民语境下农民insurgent consciousness的一些普遍、基础的要素,用的是阶级矛盾和Gramsci的集体革命意识分析,用的历史是从1783到1900英国殖民下且还未被民族主义和社会主义“侵蚀”的印度农民起义。我的问题是,这种农民和精英在话语/意识层面的不对称由于有物质和权力不对称的加持,导致不可能像“内部矛盾”那样通过leaderfulness来解决,最终总是前者被吸纳到后者的主体中去,可以说二十世纪农民的行动创造了历史,但其主体却是缺位和displaced的?
评分核心观点是农民起义背后有自己的一套心理机制、价值观、思想和结构。从英国法国印度中国(主要是《湖南农民运动考察报告》)关于农民起义的史料里挖掘能充实农民起义的基本面(“否定”、“模糊性”、“形式”、“扩散”和“区域性”)的论据。不是很喜欢这种使用史料的方法,生生掰开再放到不同的名目下,生硬了些。对印度史不熟悉,跳过了不少。
评分A typically Marxian historical work. The chapter on transmission reveals the role of rumour and other verbal and non-verbal media of knowledge in the structure of insurgency and is very much suggestive to me as a student of material culture. Yet the problem of historical source still appears to me a barrier to the understanding of what and how the
评分
评分
评分
评分
Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024